Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Lemma 2.1 — (D) has an optimal 0/10/10/1 solution

Proved
SingleMachineSched.LPRelax.lemma_2_1

by mikedeng1 · Sep 28, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

linear-programminglp-relaxationp2o-batch-p200bp2o-gran-per-chapterp2o-plan-paperp2o-v1schedulingtime-indexed

Let nnn jobs have integral processing times pj>0p_j > 0pj​>0, integral release dates rj≥0r_j \ge 0rj​≥0 and weights wj≥0w_j \ge 0wj​≥0, and let the horizon T∈NT \in \mathbb NT∈N bound the makespan of some feasible nonpreemptive schedule. Then the preemptive time-indexed relaxation (D) has an optimal solution with integral entries: there is a feasible y∗y^*y∗ with

yjτ∗∈{0,1}for all j and τy^*_{j\tau} \in \{0, 1\} \quad \text{for all } j \text{ and } \tauyjτ∗​∈{0,1}for all j and τ

such that ∑jwjCj(y∗)≤∑jwjCj(y)\sum_j w_j C_j(y^*) \le \sum_j w_j C_j(y)∑j​wj​Cj​(y∗)≤∑j​wj​Cj​(y) for every feasible yyy, where Cj(⋅)C_j(\cdot)Cj​(⋅) is given by (2.1).

The lemma reflects that, after eliminating CjC_jCj​ with (2.1), (D) is a transportation problem. It is the starting point of the interchange argument for Theorem 2.2.

Formalization Note Optimality is stated directly (the solution attains the minimum over all feasible yyy), not through the value ZDZ_DZD​. The paper's standing assumption is wj>0w_j > 0wj​>0; the statement is made for wj≥0w_j \ge 0wj​≥0.

Preamble
import Mathlib
import Definitions.Def_SingleMachineSched_LPRelax_RelaxationD
Formal statement
namespace SingleMachineSched.LPRelax

/-- Lemma 2.1: (D) has an optimal solution with `y_{jτ} ∈ {0, 1}` for all `j` and `τ`. -/
theorem lemma_2_1 {n : ℕ} (p r : Fin n → ℕ) (w : Fin n → ℝ) (T : ℕ)
    (hp : ∀ j, 0 < p j) (hw : ∀ j, 0 ≤ w j) (hT : IsMakespanBound p r T) :
    ∃ y : Fin n → ℕ → ℝ, FeasibleD p r T y ∧ (∀ j τ, y j τ = 0 ∨ y j τ = 1) ∧
      ∀ y' : Fin n → ℕ → ℝ, FeasibleD p r T y' → objD p r w T y ≤ objD p r w T y' := by sorry

end SingleMachineSched.LPRelax
Source
Goemans, Queyranne, Schulz, Skutella & Wang, Single Machine Scheduling with Release Dates, SIAM J. Discrete Math. 15(2) (2002), p. 170, Lemma 2.1
Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Oct 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by mikedeng1 · Oct 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me