Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Proof of Theorem 7, p. 1332 — a (Choice Based) solution u gives the (Reduced) solution x̃_j = Σ_S P_{j,S} u_S, z̃_j = Σ_S R_{j,S} u_S with the same objective

Proved
MarkovChainChoice.Reduced.choiceBased_to_reduced

by mikedeng1 · Sep 28, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

choice-modelslinear-programmingp2o-batch-p200bp2o-gran-per-chapterp2o-plan-paperp2o-v1revenue-management

Consider the network revenue management problem with mmm resources of capacities cqc_qcq​, a horizon of TTT periods, revenues rjr_jrj​ and consumptions aq,ja_{q,j}aq,j​, under a Markov chain choice model. Let uuu be any feasible solution of the (Choice Based) linear program, i.e. uS≥0u_S\ge 0uS​≥0 for all S⊆NS\subseteq NS⊆N, ∑S⊆N∑j∈NTaq,jPj,SuS≤cq\sum_{S\subseteq N}\sum_{j\in N}T a_{q,j}P_{j,S}u_S\le c_q∑S⊆N​∑j∈N​Taq,j​Pj,S​uS​≤cq​ for all qqq, and ∑S⊆NuS=1\sum_{S\subseteq N}u_S = 1∑S⊆N​uS​=1. Define

x~j=∑S⊆NPj,S uS,z~j=∑S⊆NRj,S uS(j∈N).\tilde x_j = \sum_{S\subseteq N}P_{j,S}\,u_S,\qquad \tilde z_j = \sum_{S\subseteq N}R_{j,S}\,u_S\qquad (j\in N).x~j​=S⊆N∑​Pj,S​uS​,z~j​=S⊆N∑​Rj,S​uS​(j∈N).

Then (x~,z~)(\tilde x,\tilde z)(x~,z~) is a feasible solution of the (Reduced) linear program, and

∑j∈NTrjx~j=∑S⊆N∑j∈NTrjPj,SuS.\sum_{j\in N}T r_j\tilde x_j = \sum_{S\subseteq N}\sum_{j\in N}T r_j P_{j,S}u_S .j∈N∑​Trj​x~j​=S⊆N∑​j∈N∑​Trj​Pj,S​uS​.

This shows that the optimal value of (Reduced) is at least that of (Choice Based).

Formalization Note The paper applies this construction to an optimal solution u~\tilde uu~ of (Choice Based); the argument uses only feasibility of u~\tilde uu~, so the statement is made for every feasible uuu. The equality of objective values is the identity used in the last sentence of the paragraph.

Preamble
import Mathlib
import Definitions.Def_MarkovChainChoice_Reduced_Model
import Definitions.Def_MarkovChainChoice_Reduced_LinearPrograms
Formal statement
namespace MarkovChainChoice.Reduced

theorem choiceBased_to_reduced {m n : ℕ} (M : Model n) (T : ℕ) (a : Fin m → Fin n → ℝ)
    (c : Fin m → ℝ) (r : Fin n → ℝ) (u : Finset (Fin n) → ℝ)
    (hu : ChoiceBasedFeasible M T a c u) :
    ReducedFeasible M T a c
        (fun j => ∑ S, purchase M S j * u S, fun j => ∑ S, visitNot M S j * u S) ∧
      reducedObjective T r
          (fun j => ∑ S, purchase M S j * u S, fun j => ∑ S, visitNot M S j * u S) =
        choiceBasedObjective M T r u := by sorry

end MarkovChainChoice.Reduced
Source
Feldman, Topaloglu, Revenue Management Under the Markov Chain Choice Model, Oper. Res. 65(5), 2017, p. 1332, proof of Theorem 7, left column, first paragraph
Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Oct 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by mikedeng1 · Oct 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me