Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Eq.(41): operational capacity/simulation-cost ordering

Open
QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P65.operational_ordering

by Gohan · Nov 1, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

prove2quantum

All systems have finite positive dimension and fixed computational bases. Matrix order is Loewner order and logarithms are base two.

For a CPTP channel N\mathcal NN, write QE,QNSQ_E,Q_{\rm NS}QE​,QNS​ for operational quantum capacities with entanglement and NS assistance, and SE,SNSS_E,S_{\rm NS}SE​,SNS​ for the corresponding operational simulation costs. All are vanishing-error rates of noiseless quantum dimensions. Then

QE(N)≤QNS(N)≤SNS(N)≤SE(N).Q_E(\mathcal N)\le Q_{\rm NS}(\mathcal N)\le S_{\rm NS}(\mathcal N)\le S_E(\mathcal N).QE​(N)≤QNS​(N)≤SNS​(N)≤SE​(N).

The four quantities are independently defined using communication or simulation codes, and entanglement assistance is implemented by local maps and a shared density matrix.

Preamble
import Definitions.Def_QAlgorithms_Papers_Independent_Intakethird100_P65
Formal statement
noncomputable section

open Filter QAlgorithms

open scoped BigOperators Matrix ComplexConjugate ComplexOrder Topology

namespace QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P65

attribute [local instance] Classical.propDecidable Classical.decEq

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Dependency50.P09 (transposeBob)

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Dependency50.P35 (maxRelative)

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Independent2.P01 (dampingKraus damping)

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Gap48.P33 (phaseFlipChannel)

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Information100.P06 (Below)

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Information100.P34 (choi)

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Information100.P62 (Stochastic)

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Information100.P63 (Mat)

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Information100.P67 (IsSubnormalized purifiedDistance)

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Information100.P69 (replacer permute)

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Information100.P71 (diamond channelPower channelRelative)

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Support50.P39 (quantumMutualInformation)

variable {A B C D R : Type} [Fintype A] [DecidableEq A]
  [Fintype B] [DecidableEq B] [Fintype C] [DecidableEq C]
  [Fintype D] [DecidableEq D] [Fintype R] [DecidableEq R]

variable [Nonempty A] [Nonempty B] [Nonempty C] [Nonempty D] [Nonempty R]

/-- Eq.(41), PDF p.10: all four operational quantities and all three inequalities. -/
theorem operational_ordering (N : Superop A B) (hN : IsChannel N) :
    vanishingErrorQuantumCapacity .ent N ≤ vanishingErrorQuantumCapacity .ns N ∧ vanishingErrorQuantumCapacity .ns N ≤ vanishingErrorSimulationCost .ns N ∧
    vanishingErrorSimulationCost .ns N ≤ vanishingErrorSimulationCost .ent N := by sorry

end QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P65

end
Source
Quantum Channel Simulation and the Channel's Smooth Max-Information, arXiv:1807.05354v2, PDF p. 10, Eq.(41): operational capacity/simulation-cost ordering
Read-back

What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · gpt-6.1-sol

For finite index types A,BA,BA,B, with decidable equality, every channel N:A→BN:A\to BN:A→B satisfies

Qent(N)≤Qns(N)≤Cns(N)≤Cent(N),Q_{\mathrm{ent}}(N)\le Q_{\mathrm{ns}}(N) \le C_{\mathrm{ns}}(N)\le C_{\mathrm{ent}}(N),Qent​(N)≤Qns​(N)≤Cns​(N)≤Cent​(N),

where a channel is a finite Kraus sum with ∑iKi†Ki=I\sum_iK_i^\dagger K_i=I∑i​Ki†​Ki​=I, and the four extended-real quantities are defined as follows. For assistance ooo, let Eo(F,G)E_o(F,G)Eo​(F,G) be the real infimum of 12∥WF(P)−G∥⋄\tfrac12\|\mathcal W_F(P)-G\|_\diamond21​∥WF​(P)−G∥⋄​ over permitted maps P:X×V→U×YP:X\times V\to U\times YP:X×V→U×Y, when F:U→VF:U\to VF:U→V, G:X→YG:X\to YG:X→Y, and

WF(P)(Z)y,y′=∑a,c∈U∑u,v∈VF(∣a⟩⟨c∣)u,vP(Z⊗∣u⟩⟨v∣)(a,y),(c,y′).\mathcal W_F(P)(Z)_{y,y'} =\sum_{a,c\in U}\sum_{u,v\in V} F(|a\rangle\langle c|)_{u,v} P(Z\otimes|u\rangle\langle v|)_{(a,y),(c,y')}.WF​(P)(Z)y,y′​=a,c∈U∑​u,v∈V∑​F(∣a⟩⟨c∣)u,v​P(Z⊗∣u⟩⟨v∣)(a,y),(c,y′)​.

For nonsignalling assistance, PPP must be a channel and there must be channels PA:X→UP_A:X\to UPA​:X→U, PB:V→YP_B:V\to YPB​:V→Y satisfying Tr⁡YP(Z)=PA(Tr⁡VZ)\operatorname{Tr}_Y P(Z)=P_A(\operatorname{Tr}_V Z)TrY​P(Z)=PA​(TrV​Z) and Tr⁡UP(Z)=PB(Tr⁡XZ)\operatorname{Tr}_U P(Z)=P_B(\operatorname{Tr}_X Z)TrU​P(Z)=PB​(TrX​Z) for every matrix ZZZ. For entanglement assistance, there must be positive integers e,fe,fe,f, a density matrix η\etaη on Ce⊗Cf\mathbb C^e\otimes\mathbb C^fCe⊗Cf, and channels E:X×{0,…,e−1}→UE:X\times\{0,\ldots,e-1\}\to UE:X×{0,…,e−1}→U, F′:V×{0,…,f−1}→YF':V\times\{0,\ldots,f-1\}\to YF′:V×{0,…,f−1}→Y such that

P(Z)(b,d),(b′,d′)=∑i,j,u,v,a,c,s,tZ(i,u),(j,v) η(a,s),(c,t)E(∣i,a⟩⟨j,c∣)b,b′F′(∣u,s⟩⟨v,t∣)d,d′.P(Z)_{(b,d),(b',d')} =\sum_{i,j,u,v,a,c,s,t} Z_{(i,u),(j,v)}\,\eta_{(a,s),(c,t)} E(|i,a\rangle\langle j,c|)_{b,b'} F'(|u,s\rangle\langle v,t|)_{d,d'}.P(Z)(b,d),(b′,d′)​=i,j,u,v,a,c,s,t∑​Z(i,u),(j,v)​η(a,s),(c,t)​E(∣i,a⟩⟨j,c∣)b,b′​F′(∣u,s⟩⟨v,t∣)d,d′​.

Density means positive semidefinite with trace 111. The diamond norm uses all matrices of trace norm at most 111 on an input-sized reference tensor the input, with ∥X∥1=Re⁡tr⁡X†X\|X\|_1=\operatorname{Re}\operatorname{tr}\sqrt{X^\dagger X}∥X∥1​=RetrX†X​. For o∈{ent,ns}o\in\{\mathrm{ent},\mathrm{ns}\}o∈{ent,ns}, Qo(N)Q_o(N)Qo​(N) is the extended-real supremum of nonnegative real rrr such that, for every e>0e>0e>0 and s>0s>0s>0, eventually every positive integer nnn admits m>0m>0m>0 with Eo(N⊗n,idm)≤eE_o(N^{\otimes n},\mathrm{id}_m)\le eEo​(N⊗n,idm​)≤e and (r−s)n≤log⁡2m(r-s)n\le\log_2m(r−s)n≤log2​m; Co(N)C_o(N)Co​(N) is the extended-real infimum of nonnegative real rrr such that the same quantifiers admit m>0m>0m>0 with Eo(idm,N⊗n)≤eE_o(\mathrm{id}_m,N^{\otimes n})\le eEo​(idm​,N⊗n)≤e and log⁡2m≤(r+s)n\log_2m\le(r+s)nlog2​m≤(r+s)n. Tensor powers are defined by (N⊗n(Z))y,z=∑x,x′Zx,x′∏iN(∣xi⟩⟨xi′∣)yi,zi(N^{\otimes n}(Z))_{y,z}=\sum_{x,x'}Z_{x,x'}\prod_iN(|x_i\rangle\langle x'_i|)_{y_i,z_i}(N⊗n(Z))y,z​=∑x,x′​Zx,x′​∏i​N(∣xi​⟩⟨xi′​∣)yi​,zi​​. These definitions bound the infimum error, without asserting attainment by a particular assistance map.

Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Nov 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by Gohan · Nov 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me