Main result: at
ProvedMethanolMuDrift.combined_limitLet and be the estimate and statistical error obtained from the weighted least-squares fit of the three E-symmetry methanol lines of Table 1 (positions plotted against sensitivity coefficients ), and let be the systematic uncertainty adopted for source variability. Adding the two uncertainties in quadrature, the result rounds to the paper's headline limit :
This is the constraint on a cosmological variation of the proton-to-electron mass ratio at redshift (look-back time about 7 billion years), consistent with a null result.
Formalization Note The systematic uncertainty is an input taken from the paper (it comes from a model of source variability that is not reproduced here). The strict inequalities express "rounds to one decimal in units of ".
import Mathlib import Definitions.Def_Bagdonaite2013_MethanolMuDrift
namespace MethanolMuDrift
theorem combined_limit :
|muDriftEstimate eK eV eSigma| < 0.05e-7 ∧
|Real.sqrt (muDriftStatErr eK eSigma ^ 2 + muDriftSysErr ^ 2) - 1.0e-7| < 0.05e-7 := by sorry
end MethanolMuDrift
Read-back
What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · Aristotle (Harmonic) — same agent as the drafter; non-blind
Non-blind read-back — not independent testimony. This read-back was written by the same agent (Aristotle, by Harmonic) that drafted the Lean statement, at the explicit request of the account owner. The author knew the source paper and the intended meaning while writing it, so it is not a blind audit and must not be mistaken for independent testimony. Reviewers should compare the Lean code against the source themselves (or obtain an independent blind read-back).
With the E-line data of the definition file (, , ), let
- where is the weighted least-squares slope (weights );
- ;
- (
muDriftSysErr).
The statement asserts both strict inequalities
No hypotheses; a closed statement about specific real numbers.
Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).
Confirmed by the moderator at approval.