Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Theorem 3.12 — the level set {f=f∞}\{f = f_\infty\}{f=f∞​} contains a point with linearly dependent GfG_fGf​

Open
ShorNonsmooth.RAlgorithm.exists_dependent_point_at_limit_level

by mikedeng1 · Oct 1, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

convergencenonsmooth-optimizationp2o-batch-b23ap2o-gran-per-chapterp2o-plan-bookp2o-v1piecewise-smoothr-algorithm

Let the assumptions of Theorem 3.11 and condition (3.50) hold: n≥1n \ge 1n≥1, f∈Kf \in Kf∈K with f(x)→+∞f(x) \to +\inftyf(x)→+∞ as ∥x∥→∞\|x\| \to \infty∥x∥→∞, α>1\alpha > 1α>1, and {xk}\{x_k\}{xk​} a sequence constructed by the r(α)r(\alpha)r(α)-algorithm applied to fff with ∥xk+1−xk∥→0\|x_{k+1} - x_k\| \to 0∥xk+1​−xk​∥→0. The values f(xk)f(x_k)f(xk​) are nonincreasing and bounded below, so

f∞=lim⁡k→∞f(xk)>−∞f_\infty = \lim_{k \to \infty} f(x_k) > -\inftyf∞​=k→∞lim​f(xk​)>−∞

exists. Then the level set U={x:f(x)=f∞}U = \{x : f(x) = f_\infty\}U={x:f(x)=f∞​} contains a point x∗x^*x∗ such that the set of vectors Gf(x∗)G_f(x^*)Gf​(x∗) is linearly dependent.

For a smooth fff (one piece) linear dependence of Gf(x∗)={∇f(x∗)}G_f(x^*) = \{\nabla f(x^*)\}Gf​(x∗)={∇f(x∗)} means ∇f(x∗)=0\nabla f(x^*) = 0∇f(x∗)=0; in general it is a generalized stationarity condition. The theorem says the monotone values of the rrr-algorithm settle at a level containing such a point.

Formalization Note f∞f_\inftyf∞​ is written as inf⁡kf(xk)\inf_k f(x_k)infk​f(xk​), which equals the limit because the values are nonincreasing and bounded below. Linear dependence of the set Gf(x∗)G_f(x^*)Gf​(x∗) is ¬ LinearIndependent of the family indexed by the elements of the set (a set containing 000 is dependent).

Preamble
import Mathlib
import Definitions.Def_ShorNonsmooth_RAlgorithm_RAlgorithm

open scoped InnerProductSpace
open Filter Topology
Formal statement
namespace ShorNonsmooth.RAlgorithm

/-- Shor (1985), p. 84, **Theorem 3.12**. Under the assumptions of Theorem 3.11 and condition
(3.50), let `f_∞ = lim_{k→∞} f(x_k)` (the values `f(x_k)` are nonincreasing and bounded below,
p. 82, so the limit is their infimum). Then the set `U = {x : f(x) = f_∞}` contains a point `x*`
such that the set of vectors `G_f(x*)` is linearly dependent. -/
theorem exists_dependent_point_at_limit_level {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) (P : KRep n)
    (f : EuclideanSpace ℝ (Fin n) → ℝ) (hf : P.Forms f)
    (hf_coercive : Tendsto f (cocompact (EuclideanSpace ℝ (Fin n))) atTop)
    (α : ℝ) (hα : 1 < α)
    (x gt g : ℕ → EuclideanSpace ℝ (Fin n))
    (B : ℕ → EuclideanSpace ℝ (Fin n) →L[ℝ] EuclideanSpace ℝ (Fin n)) (h : ℕ → ℝ)
    (hrun : IsRun P f α 0 x gt g B h)
    (hstep : Tendsto (fun k => ‖x (k + 1) - x k‖) atTop (𝓝 0)) :
    ∃ xs : EuclideanSpace ℝ (Fin n), f xs = ⨅ k, f (x k) ∧
      ¬ LinearIndependent ℝ ((↑) : P.Gf xs → EuclideanSpace ℝ (Fin n)) := by sorry

end ShorNonsmooth.RAlgorithm
Source
Shor, Minimization Methods for Non-Differentiable Functions, Springer 1985, p. 84, Theorem 3.12 (proof pp. 84–85); f∞f_\inftyf∞​ defined on p. 82
Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Oct 2, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by mikedeng1 · Oct 2, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me