Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

§3.1.1 — with probability ≥ 1 − 1/m no item appears more than 3 log m / log log m times

Proved
ComplementFreeCA.CFRounding.items_bound

by mikedeng1 · Sep 28, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

combinatorial-auctionsp2o-batch-p200bp2o-gran-per-chapterp2o-plan-paperp2o-v1probabilityrandomized-rounding

There is m0m_0m0​ such that for every m≥m0m\ge m_0m≥m0​, every number nnn of bidders and every LP-feasible xxx, the randomized-rounding preallocation σ=(S1,…,Sn)\sigma=(S_1,\dots,S_n)σ=(S1​,…,Sn​) satisfies:

  1. for each item jjj,
Pr⁡[j appears in more than 3log⁡mlog⁡log⁡m of the bundles S1,…,Sn]≤1m2;\Pr\Big[j \text{ appears in more than } \tfrac{3\log m}{\log\log m} \text{ of the bundles } S_1,\dots,S_n\Big]\le\frac1{m^2};Pr[j appears in more than loglogm3logm​ of the bundles S1​,…,Sn​]≤m21​;
  1. by the union bound over the mmm items,
Pr⁡[some item appears in more than 3log⁡mlog⁡log⁡m bundles]≤1m.\Pr\Big[\text{some item appears in more than } \tfrac{3\log m}{\log\log m} \text{ bundles}\Big]\le\frac1{m}.Pr[some item appears in more than loglogm3logm​ bundles]≤m1​.

This is the first half of the analysis of step (i) of the algorithm in §3.1.1: with high probability the preallocation violates each item constraint by at most a factor kkk.

Formalization Note The paper's display after Lemma 3.1 prints the threshold as log⁡m/(3log⁡log⁡m)\log m/(3\log\log m)logm/(3loglogm), a slip for the lemma's 3log⁡m/log⁡log⁡m3\log m/\log\log m3logm/loglogm (with the smaller threshold the 1/m21/m^21/m2 bound fails); the statement uses 3log⁡m/log⁡log⁡m3\log m/\log\log m3logm/loglogm. The probability is the finite-sum rounding probability of the LP definition file; log⁡\loglog is the natural logarithm; m0m_0m0​ is existential because Lemma 3.1 holds for sufficiently large mmm.

Preamble
import Mathlib
import Definitions.Def_ComplementFreeCA_CFRounding_Auction
import Definitions.Def_ComplementFreeCA_CFRounding_LP
import Definitions.Def_ComplementFreeCA_CFRounding_Algorithm
Formal statement
namespace ComplementFreeCA.CFRounding

theorem items_bound :
    ∃ m₀ : ℕ, ∀ m : ℕ, m₀ ≤ m → ∀ (n : ℕ) (x : Fin n → Finset (Fin m) → ℝ), IsLPFeasible x →
      (∀ j : Fin m, roundProb x
          (fun σ => 3 * Real.log m / Real.log (Real.log m) < (count σ j : ℝ)) ≤ 1 / (m : ℝ) ^ 2) ∧
      roundProb x
          (fun σ => ∃ j : Fin m, 3 * Real.log m / Real.log (Real.log m) < (count σ j : ℝ))
        ≤ 1 / (m : ℝ) := by sorry

end ComplementFreeCA.CFRounding
Source
Dobzinski, Nisan, Schapira, Approximation Algorithms for Combinatorial Auctions with Complement-Free Bidders, Math. Oper. Res. 35(1), 2010, p. 6, §3.1.1, display after Lemma 3.1 and the union-bound sentence that follows
Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Oct 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by mikedeng1 · Oct 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me