Theorem 8.16 — Parseval's theorem
ProvedRudin.ch08_parsevalanalysisfourier-analysis
Let and be Riemann-integrable -periodic functions with Fourier coefficients and . Then ; ; and, taking , . The two-sided sums are the limits of the symmetric partial sums .
Preamble
import Mathlib import Definitions.Def_Rudin_ch08_fourier open Filter Topology
Formal statement
namespace Rudin
/-- Rudin, Theorem 8.16 (Parseval's theorem): for Riemann-integrable `2π`-periodic functions
`f` and `g` with Fourier coefficients `cₙ` and `γₙ`, the Fourier series of `f` converges to
`f` in the mean square sense, the inner products agree with the sum of `cₙ conj γₙ`, and
`(1/2π) ∫ |f|² = ∑ |cₙ|²`. -/
theorem ch08_parseval (f g : ℝ → ℂ) (hfper : HasPeriodTwoPi f) (hgper : HasPeriodTwoPi g)
(hf : IntervalIntegrable f MeasureTheory.volume (-Real.pi) Real.pi)
(hg : IntervalIntegrable g MeasureTheory.volume (-Real.pi) Real.pi)
(hf2 : IntervalIntegrable (fun x => ‖f x‖ ^ 2) MeasureTheory.volume (-Real.pi) Real.pi)
(hg2 : IntervalIntegrable (fun x => ‖g x‖ ^ 2) MeasureTheory.volume (-Real.pi) Real.pi) :
Tendsto (fun N => L2Norm (fun x => f x - fourierPartialSum f N x)) atTop (𝓝 0) ∧
Tendsto (fun N => ∑ n ∈ Finset.Icc (-(N : ℤ)) (N : ℤ),
fourierCoeff f n * (starRingEnd ℂ) (fourierCoeff g n)) atTop
(𝓝 ((1 / (2 * Real.pi) : ℂ) *
∫ x in (-Real.pi)..Real.pi, f x * (starRingEnd ℂ) (g x))) ∧
Tendsto (fun N => ∑ n ∈ Finset.Icc (-(N : ℤ)) (N : ℤ), ‖fourierCoeff f n‖ ^ 2) atTop
(𝓝 ((1 / (2 * Real.pi)) * ∫ x in (-Real.pi)..Real.pi, ‖f x‖ ^ 2)) := by sorry
end RudinSource
Walter Rudin, Principles of Mathematical Analysis, 3rd edition, McGraw-Hill, 1976, Chapter 8, p. 191, Theorem 8.16
Read-back
What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · Aristotle (Harmonic)
Let satisfy and for all real , and assume that , , and are each interval-integrable on with respect to Lebesgue measure. Write
and similarly . Then three assertions hold simultaneously as :
- Mean-square convergence. .
- Polarized identity. .
- Parseval identity. .
All three concern the symmetric partial sums over ; items 2 and 3 are stated as limits of those finite sums rather than as unconditional sums over . The square root in returns on negative arguments, and integrability of the product is not assumed separately.
Human review
Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).