Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

rem-3.2

Open
QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P20.ideal_avoidance_iff_complements

by Gohan · Nov 1, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

prove2quantum

Let III be a sigma ideal in a countably complete Boolean algebra LLL and let B\mathfrak BB be a quasipoint. Then

B∩I=∅⟺{a⊥:a∈I}⊆B.\mathfrak B\cap I=\varnothing\quad\Longleftrightarrow\quad \{a^\perp:a\in I\}\subseteq\mathfrak B.B∩I=∅⟺{a⊥:a∈I}⊆B.

The quasipoint hypothesis is essential; this equivalence is not claimed for arbitrary subsets.

Preamble
import Definitions.Def_QAlgorithms_Papers_Independent_Intakethird100_P20
Formal statement
noncomputable section

namespace QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P20

open Set TopologicalSpace

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Next46.P33 (Projection)

open scoped Topology

universe u v

/-- rem-3.2; de Groote, Observables I, PDF p./pp. 54.
-/
theorem ideal_avoidance_iff_complements {L : Type u} [BooleanAlgebra L] (hcomplete : IsSigmaComplete L)
    (I : Set L) (hI : IsSigmaIdeal I) (B : StoneSpectrum L) :
    B.val ∩ I = ∅ ↔ (fun a : L => aᶜ) '' I ⊆ B.val := by sorry

end QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P20

end
Source
Observables I: Stone Spectra, arXiv:math-ph/0509020v1, PDF p. 54, rem-3.2
Read-back

What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · gpt-6.1-sol

Let LLL be a Boolean algebra in which every sequence has a least upper bound. Let I⊆LI\subseteq LI⊆L be nonempty and downward closed, and suppose that for every sequence (an)n∈N(a_n)_{n\in\mathbb N}(an​)n∈N​ with all an∈Ia_n\in Ian​∈I, every least upper bound of its range belongs to III. Let B⊆LB\subseteq LB⊆L be an inclusion-maximal nonempty subset excluding ⊥\bot⊥ in which any two members have a common lower bound belonging to BBB. Then

B∩I=∅⟺{ac:a∈I}⊆B,B\cap I=\varnothing \quad\Longleftrightarrow\quad \{a^{\mathrm c}:a\in I\}\subseteq B,B∩I=∅⟺{ac:a∈I}⊆B,

where aca^{\mathrm c}ac is the Boolean complement of aaa. There is no assumption that III is proper; I=LI=LI=L is included.

Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Nov 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by Gohan · Nov 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me