Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaGalaxyBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
Log in
← Formalpedia

Reeb trajectories, families of embedded fast planes along a trajectory, and open books of fast planes

Definition
FiniteEnergyPlane_OpenBook

by Mazecto · Nov 4, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

fast-planesglobal-surfaces-of-sectionopen-book-decompositionspseudoholomorphic-curvesreeb-dynamicssymplectic-geometrysymplectization

Families of embedded fast planes in the symplectization of a strictly star-shaped level S=H−1(1)⊂R4S=H^{-1}(1)\subset\mathbb{R}^4S=H−1(1)⊂R4, in the setting of FiniteEnergyPlane_Setting, FiniteEnergyPlane_Asymptotics, FiniteEnergyPlane_Winding, FiniteEnergyPlane_Compactness and FiniteEnergyPlane_Fredholm with n=1n=1n=1 (U. Hryniewicz 2012, § 7). A family of planes is a map U:R×C→R4U:\mathbb{R}\times\mathbb{C}\to\mathbb{R}^4U:R×C→R4, and its SSS-component is proj∘U\mathrm{proj}\circ Uproj∘U. Let P=(x,T)P=(x,T)P=(x,T) be a periodic Reeb orbit and γ∈R\gamma\in\mathbb{R}γ∈R.

  1. Reeb trajectory. A map y:R→R2n+2y:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}^{2n+2}y:R→R2n+2 with y(t)∈Sy(t)\in Sy(t)∈S and y′(t)=R(y(t))y'(t)=R(y(t))y′(t)=R(y(t)) for all ttt.
  2. pageMap H U is the map (t,z)↦proj(U(t,z))(t,z)\mapsto\mathrm{proj}(U(t,z))(t,z)↦proj(U(t,z)).
  3. IsReebPositiveAt H U p. At p∈R×Cp\in\mathbb{R}\times\mathbb{C}p∈R×C there are c>0c>0c>0 and v∈Cv\in\mathbb{C}v∈C with D(pageMap H U)(p)(c,v)=R(pageMap H U (p))D(\mathrm{pageMap}\,H\,U)(p)(c,v)=R(\mathrm{pageMap}\,H\,U\,(p))D(pageMapHU)(p)(c,v)=R(pageMapHU(p)).
  4. IsPageFamilyOn H J P γ y l I U. UUU is of class ClC^lCl on I×CI\times\mathbb{C}I×C, and U(t,⋅)∈Λ({y(t)},P)U(t,\cdot)\in\Lambda(\{y(t)\},P)U(t,⋅)∈Λ({y(t)},P) for every t∈It\in It∈I.
  5. IsPageFoliation H J P γ y l L δ U. UUU is such a family on I=(−δ,L+δ)I=(-\delta,L+\delta)I=(−δ,L+δ); on I×CI\times\mathbb{C}I×C the map pageMap H U\mathrm{pageMap}\,H\,UpageMapHU avoids x(R)x(\mathbb{R})x(R), has injective derivative, and is Reeb positive; the leaves at t=0t=0t=0 and t=Lt=Lt=L have the same image Σ\SigmaΣ; and pageMap H U\mathrm{pageMap}\,H\,UpageMapHU maps (0,L)×C(0,L)\times\mathbb{C}(0,L)×C bijectively onto S∖(Σ∪x(R))S\setminus(\Sigma\cup x(\mathbb{R}))S∖(Σ∪x(R)).
  6. IsPlaneOpenBook H J P l U. UUU is of class ClC^lCl on R×C\mathbb{R}\times\mathbb{C}R×C and 111-periodic in the first variable; every U(θ,⋅)U(\theta,\cdot)U(θ,⋅) is an embedded fast finite-energy plane asymptotic to PPP at ∞\infty∞; pageMap H U\mathrm{pageMap}\,H\,UpageMapHU avoids x(R)x(\mathbb{R})x(R); every q∈S∖x(R)q\in S\setminus x(\mathbb{R})q∈S∖x(R) is the image of exactly one point of [0,1)×C[0,1)\times\mathbb{C}[0,1)×C; and the derivative of pageMap H U\mathrm{pageMap}\,H\,UpageMapHU is injective and Reeb positive at every point.

Formalization Note The point (0,q)∈R×S(0,q)\in\mathbb{R}\times S(0,q)∈R×S is qqq itself in R4∖{0}\mathbb{R}^4\setminus\{0\}R4∖{0}, so Hryniewicz's set Λt=Λ({(0,y(t))},P)\Lambda_t=\Lambda(\{(0,y(t))\},P)Λt​=Λ({(0,y(t))},P) of (101) is embeddedFastPlaneSet H J P {y t} γ. "Orientation preserving" for u:S1×C→M∖x(R)u:S^1\times\mathbb{C}\to M\setminus x(\mathbb{R})u:S1×C→M∖x(R) in Hryniewicz's Theorem 2.5 is stated as Reeb positivity. For a map with injective derivative whose slices are fast planes, the two agree: SSS is oriented by λ∧dλ\lambda\wedge d\lambdaλ∧dλ, and since λ(R)=1\lambda(R)=1λ(R)=1 and iRdλ=0i_Rd\lambda=0iR​dλ=0, one has (λ∧dλ)(∂θu,∂su,∂tu)=dλ(∂su,∂tu)/c(\lambda\wedge d\lambda)(\partial_\theta u,\partial_su,\partial_tu)=d\lambda(\partial_su,\partial_tu)/c(λ∧dλ)(∂θ​u,∂s​u,∂t​u)=dλ(∂s​u,∂t​u)/c with dλ(∂su,∂tu)>0d\lambda(\partial_su,\partial_tu)>0dλ(∂s​u,∂t​u)>0 on a fast plane. The circle S1=R/LZS^1=\mathbb{R}/L\mathbb{Z}S1=R/LZ of Hryniewicz's statement is normalized to period 111, and a map on the circle is a periodic map on R\mathbb{R}R. A bijective ClC^lCl map with injective derivative onto S∖x(R)S\setminus x(\mathbb{R})S∖x(R) is a ClC^lCl diffeomorphism, so "diffeomorphism" is not stated separately. No flow map is used: trajectories are maps yyy with the stated derivative.

Definition code
import Definitions.Def_FiniteEnergyPlane_Fredholm

/-!
# Families of embedded fast finite-energy planes and open book decompositions

U. Hryniewicz, *Fast finite-energy planes in symplectizations and applications*, Trans. AMS 364
(2012), § 2 (Theorem 2.5) and § 7. Everything is in the setting of `FiniteEnergyPlane_Setting`,
`FiniteEnergyPlane_Asymptotics`, `FiniteEnergyPlane_Winding`, `FiniteEnergyPlane_Compactness` and
`FiniteEnergyPlane_Fredholm` for `n = 1`: `S = H⁻¹(1) ⊂ V 1 = ℝ⁴` strictly star-shaped, and the
symplectization `ℝ × S` is `V 1 \ {0}` with `y = e^{2 aCoord y} • proj y`.

Conventions.
* A family of planes is a map `U : ℝ × ℂ → V 1`; its `S`-component is `pageMap H U = proj H ∘ U`.
* The point `(0, q) ∈ ℝ × S` is `q` itself, so Hryniewicz's set `Λₜ = Λ({(0, y(t))}, P)` is
  `embeddedFastPlaneSet H J P {y t} γ`.
* "Orientation preserving" for a map into the oriented manifold `S` is expressed against the Reeb
  field, see `IsReebPositiveAt`.
-/

namespace FiniteEnergyPlane

noncomputable section

open MeasureTheory Metric Filter Topology
open scoped ContDiff ENNReal Real

/-- `y : ℝ → V n` is a trajectory of the Reeb field on `S = H⁻¹(1)`: `y(t) ∈ S` and `y' = R(y)`. -/
def IsReebTrajectory {n : ℕ} (H : V n → ℝ) (y : ℝ → V n) : Prop :=
  (∀ t, y t ∈ energySurface H) ∧ ∀ t, HasDerivAt y (reeb H (y t)) t

/-- The `S`-component `(t, z) ↦ proj H (U (t, z))` of a family `U : ℝ × ℂ → V n` of planes. -/
def pageMap {n : ℕ} (H : V n → ℝ) (U : ℝ × ℂ → V n) (p : ℝ × ℂ) : V n := proj H (U p)

/-- At `p`, the Reeb vector at `pageMap H U p` is the image under the derivative of `pageMap H U`
of a vector whose `ℝ`-component is positive. -/
def IsReebPositiveAt {n : ℕ} (H : V n → ℝ) (U : ℝ × ℂ → V n) (p : ℝ × ℂ) : Prop :=
  ∃ c > 0, ∃ v : ℂ, fderiv ℝ (pageMap H U) p (c, v) = reeb H (pageMap H U p)

/-- Hryniewicz (2012), § 7.1: `U` is a `C^l` family on `I × ℂ` along the trajectory `y`, with
`U(t, ·) ∈ Λₜ = Λ({y t}, P)` for every `t ∈ I`. -/
def IsPageFamilyOn (H : V 1 → ℝ) (J : V 1 → V 1 →L[ℝ] V 1) (P : ReebOrbit H) (γ : ℝ)
    (y : ℝ → V 1) (l : ℕ) (I : Set ℝ) (U : ℝ × ℂ → V 1) : Prop :=
  ContDiffOn ℝ l U (I ×ˢ Set.univ) ∧
    ∀ t ∈ I, (fun z => U (t, z)) ∈ embeddedFastPlaneSet H J P {y t} γ

/-- Hryniewicz (2012), Lemma 7.7: `U` is a `C^l` family along `y` on `(-δ, L + δ) × ℂ`, whose map
`pageMap H U` avoids `x(ℝ)`, has injective derivative and is positive against the Reeb field. The
leaves at `t = 0` and `t = L` have the same image, and `pageMap H U` maps `(0, L) × ℂ` bijectively
onto the complement in `S` of that leaf and of `x(ℝ)`. -/
def IsPageFoliation (H : V 1 → ℝ) (J : V 1 → V 1 →L[ℝ] V 1) (P : ReebOrbit H) (γ : ℝ)
    (y : ℝ → V 1) (l : ℕ) (L δ : ℝ) (U : ℝ × ℂ → V 1) : Prop :=
  IsPageFamilyOn H J P γ y l (Set.Ioo (-δ) (L + δ)) U ∧
    (∀ p ∈ Set.Ioo (-δ) (L + δ) ×ˢ (Set.univ : Set ℂ),
      pageMap H U p ∉ Set.range P.x ∧ Function.Injective (fderiv ℝ (pageMap H U) p) ∧
        IsReebPositiveAt H U p) ∧
    Set.range (fun z => pageMap H U (L, z)) = Set.range (fun z => pageMap H U (0, z)) ∧
    Set.BijOn (pageMap H U) (Set.Ioo 0 L ×ˢ Set.univ)
      (energySurface H \ (Set.range (fun z => pageMap H U (0, z)) ∪ Set.range P.x))

/-- Hryniewicz (2012), Theorem 2.5 (1) and (2): `U : ℝ × ℂ → V 1` is `C^l` and `1`-periodic in the
first variable; every `U(θ, ·)` is an embedded fast finite-energy plane asymptotic to `P` at `∞`;
`pageMap H U` avoids `x(ℝ)` and maps `[0, 1) × ℂ` bijectively onto `S \ x(ℝ)`, with injective
derivative, and it is positive against the Reeb field. -/
def IsPlaneOpenBook (H : V 1 → ℝ) (J : V 1 → V 1 →L[ℝ] V 1) (P : ReebOrbit H) (l : ℕ)
    (U : ℝ × ℂ → V 1) : Prop :=
  ContDiff ℝ l U ∧ (∀ θ z, U (θ + 1, z) = U (θ, z)) ∧
    (∀ θ, IsFastPlane H J (fun z => U (θ, z)) ∧
      IsNondegenerateEnd H (fun z => U (θ, z)) cylInf P 1 ∧ IsEmbeddedPlane (fun z => U (θ, z))) ∧
    (∀ p, pageMap H U p ∉ Set.range P.x) ∧
    (∀ q ∈ energySurface H, q ∉ Set.range P.x →
      ∃! p : ℝ × ℂ, p.1 ∈ Set.Ico (0 : ℝ) 1 ∧ pageMap H U p = q) ∧
    (∀ p, Function.Injective (fderiv ℝ (pageMap H U) p)) ∧
    ∀ p, IsReebPositiveAt H U p

end

end FiniteEnergyPlane
Source
U. Hryniewicz, Fast finite-energy planes in symplectizations and applications, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 364 (2012), 1859–1931, arXiv:0812.4076, Theorem 2.5, formula (101), and Lemma 7.7
Read-back

What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · claude-opus-5-5

Definition module FiniteEnergyPlane_OpenBook

This module introduces six notions: Reeb trajectories, the page map, Reeb positivity at a point, page families, page foliations, and plane open books. The background notions they use are written out in the section "Background notions" below.

Reeb trajectory (IsReebTrajectory). For n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N}n∈N, H:Vn→RH:V_n\to\mathbb{R}H:Vn​→R and y:R→Vny:\mathbb{R}\to V_ny:R→Vn​: yyy is a Reeb trajectory of HHH when, for every t∈Rt\in\mathbb{R}t∈R, H(y(t))=1H(y(t))=1H(y(t))=1 and yyy is differentiable at ttt with y′(t)=RH(y(t))y'(t)=R_H(y(t))y′(t)=RH​(y(t)). The trajectory is defined for all real times, and nothing excludes yyy running along a periodic orbit.

Page map (pageMap). For H:Vn→RH:V_n\to\mathbb{R}H:Vn​→R and U:R×C→VnU:\mathbb{R}\times\mathbb{C}\to V_nU:R×C→Vn​, the page map is

ΠU:R×C→Vn,ΠU(p)=prH(U(p)),\Pi_U:\mathbb{R}\times\mathbb{C}\to V_n,\qquad \Pi_U(p)=\mathrm{pr}_H(U(p)),ΠU​:R×C→Vn​,ΠU​(p)=prH​(U(p)),

the radial projection of UUU (see background). ΠU(t,⋅)\Pi_U(t,\cdot)ΠU​(t,⋅) is the ttt-th page.

Reeb positivity at a point (IsReebPositiveAt). For p∈R×Cp\in\mathbb{R}\times\mathbb{C}p∈R×C: there exist a real c>0c>0c>0 and v∈Cv\in\mathbb{C}v∈C with

DΠU(p)[(c,v)]=RH(ΠU(p)).D\Pi_U(p)[(c,v)]=R_H(\Pi_U(p)).DΠU​(p)[(c,v)]=RH​(ΠU​(p)).

Here DΠU(p)D\Pi_U(p)DΠU​(p) is the real Fréchet derivative on R×C\mathbb{R}\times\mathbb{C}R×C; at a point of non-differentiability it is the zero map by convention, and then the condition asks that RH(ΠU(p))=0R_H(\Pi_U(p))=0RH​(ΠU​(p))=0.

Page family on a set (IsPageFamilyOn). Data: H:V1→RH:V_1\to\mathbb{R}H:V1​→R; J:V1→L(V1,V1)J:V_1\to\mathcal{L}(V_1,V_1)J:V1​→L(V1​,V1​); a Reeb orbit PPP of HHH; γ∈R\gamma\in\mathbb{R}γ∈R; y:R→V1y:\mathbb{R}\to V_1y:R→V1​; l∈Nl\in\mathbb{N}l∈N; I⊆RI\subseteq\mathbb{R}I⊆R; U:R×C→V1U:\mathbb{R}\times\mathbb{C}\to V_1U:R×C→V1​. The condition is the conjunction of:

  1. UUU is ClC^lCl on the set I×CI\times\mathbb{C}I×C (in the sense of differentiability within that set; nothing is required of UUU off I×CI\times\mathbb{C}I×C);
  2. for every t∈It\in It∈I, the map z↦U(t,z)z\mapsto U(t,z)z↦U(t,z) belongs to E(H,J,P,{y(t)},γ)\mathcal{E}(H,J,P,\{y(t)\},\gamma)E(H,J,P,{y(t)},γ) (see background), i.e. it is an embedded fast plane with end on PPP, with U(t,0)=y(t)U(t,0)=y(t)U(t,0)=y(t), and with dλd\lambdadλ-energy on {∣z∣>1}\{|z|>1\}{∣z∣>1} equal to max⁡(γ,0)\max(\gamma,0)max(γ,0).

The definition does not require yyy to be a trajectory, nor γ>0\gamma>0γ>0, nor l≥1l\ge 1l≥1. If I=∅I=\emptysetI=∅ the condition is vacuous. With l=0l=0l=0 clause 1 is continuity on the set.

Page foliation (IsPageFoliation). The same data, with III replaced by reals L,δL,\deltaL,δ. Write IL,δ=(−δ,L+δ)I_{L,\delta}=(-\delta,L+\delta)IL,δ​=(−δ,L+δ). The condition is the conjunction of:

  1. UUU is a page family on IL,δI_{L,\delta}IL,δ​ with the data H,J,P,γ,y,lH,J,P,\gamma,y,lH,J,P,γ,y,l;
  2. for every p∈IL,δ×Cp\in I_{L,\delta}\times\mathbb{C}p∈IL,δ​×C: ΠU(p)∉im P\Pi_U(p)\notin\mathrm{im}\,PΠU​(p)∈/imP, the derivative DΠU(p):R×C→V1D\Pi_U(p):\mathbb{R}\times\mathbb{C}\to V_1DΠU​(p):R×C→V1​ is injective, and UUU is Reeb positive at ppp;
  3. the page at LLL and the page at 000 have the same image, as sets:
{ΠU(L,z):z∈C}={ΠU(0,z):z∈C};\{\Pi_U(L,z):z\in\mathbb{C}\}=\{\Pi_U(0,z):z\in\mathbb{C}\};{ΠU​(L,z):z∈C}={ΠU​(0,z):z∈C};
  1. ΠU\Pi_UΠU​ restricts to a bijection
(0,L)×C  ⟶  {H=1}∖({ΠU(0,z):z∈C}∪im P)(0,L)\times\mathbb{C}\;\longrightarrow\;\{H=1\}\setminus\big(\{\Pi_U(0,z):z\in\mathbb{C}\}\cup\mathrm{im}\,P\big)(0,L)×C⟶{H=1}∖({ΠU​(0,z):z∈C}∪imP)

(maps into the target, injective on the source, surjective onto the target).

The definition itself imposes no sign on LLL or δ\deltaδ. If L+δ≤−δL+\delta\le-\deltaL+δ≤−δ then IL,δI_{L,\delta}IL,δ​ is empty and clauses 1 and 2 are vacuous; if L≤0L\le0L≤0 the source in clause 4 is empty and clause 4 asks that the target be empty. Clause 3 uses the values at 000 and LLL whether or not these lie in IL,δI_{L,\delta}IL,δ​. Nothing is stated about ΠU\Pi_UΠU​ off IL,δ×CI_{L,\delta}\times\mathbb{C}IL,δ​×C.

Plane open book (IsPlaneOpenBook). Data: H:V1→RH:V_1\to\mathbb{R}H:V1​→R; JJJ; a Reeb orbit PPP of HHH; l∈Nl\in\mathbb{N}l∈N; U:R×C→V1U:\mathbb{R}\times\mathbb{C}\to V_1U:R×C→V1​. The condition is the conjunction of:

  1. UUU is ClC^lCl on all of R×C\mathbb{R}\times\mathbb{C}R×C;
  2. U(θ+1,z)=U(θ,z)U(\theta+1,z)=U(\theta,z)U(θ+1,z)=U(θ,z) for all θ∈R\theta\in\mathbb{R}θ∈R, z∈Cz\in\mathbb{C}z∈C;
  3. for every θ∈R\theta\in\mathbb{R}θ∈R, the map uθ=U(θ,⋅)u_\theta=U(\theta,\cdot)uθ​=U(θ,⋅) is a fast plane, has a nondegenerate end at infinity on PPP with sign +1+1+1, and is an embedded plane (see background);
  4. for every ppp: ΠU(p)∉im P\Pi_U(p)\notin\mathrm{im}\,PΠU​(p)∈/imP;
  5. for every qqq with H(q)=1H(q)=1H(q)=1 and q∉im Pq\notin\mathrm{im}\,Pq∈/imP there is exactly one p=(θ,z)∈R×Cp=(\theta,z)\in\mathbb{R}\times\mathbb{C}p=(θ,z)∈R×C with θ∈[0,1)\theta\in[0,1)θ∈[0,1) and ΠU(p)=q\Pi_U(p)=qΠU​(p)=q;
  6. for every ppp: DΠU(p):R×C→V1D\Pi_U(p):\mathbb{R}\times\mathbb{C}\to V_1DΠU​(p):R×C→V1​ is injective;
  7. for every ppp: UUU is Reeb positive at ppp.

No value of the dλd\lambdadλ-energy and no prescribed base point U(θ,0)U(\theta,0)U(θ,0) occurs in this definition; the orbit PPP is not required here to be prime or nondegenerate; the orbit P′P'P′ in the definition of "fast plane" is quantified separately for each θ\thetaθ. With l=0l=0l=0 clause 1 is continuity, while clauses 6 and 7 still concern the derivative of ΠU\Pi_UΠU​.

Background notions

Conventions. Vn=R2(n+1)V_n=\mathbb{R}^{2(n+1)}Vn​=R2(n+1) with coordinates v0,…,v2n+1v_0,\dots,v_{2n+1}v0​,…,v2n+1​; below mostly n=1n=1n=1, so V1=R4V_1=\mathbb{R}^4V1​=R4. Df(p)Df(p)Df(p) denotes the real Fréchet derivative, which is the zero map by convention where fff is not differentiable. For fff on C\mathbb{C}C: ∂sf(z)=Df(z)[1]\partial_sf(z)=Df(z)[1]∂s​f(z)=Df(z)[1], ∂tf(z)=Df(z)[i]\partial_tf(z)=Df(z)[i]∂t​f(z)=Df(z)[i]. Also 0−1=00^{-1}=00−1=0, and im P\mathrm{im}\,PimP is the image of xP:R→Vnx_P:\mathbb{R}\to V_nxP​:R→Vn​.

Symplectic data on VnV_nVn​. (j0v)k=−vk+1(j_0v)_k=-v_{k+1}(j0​v)k​=−vk+1​ for kkk even, (j0v)k=vk−1(j_0v)_k=v_{k-1}(j0​v)k​=vk−1​ for kkk odd. ω0(u,v)=∑k(j0u)kvk=∑i(u2iv2i+1−u2i+1v2i)\omega_0(u,v)=\sum_k(j_0u)_kv_k=\sum_i(u_{2i}v_{2i+1}-u_{2i+1}v_{2i})ω0​(u,v)=∑k​(j0​u)k​vk​=∑i​(u2i​v2i+1​−u2i+1​v2i​). λx(v)=12ω0(x,v)\lambda_x(v)=\tfrac12\omega_0(x,v)λx​(v)=21​ω0​(x,v). ∇H(x)\nabla H(x)∇H(x) has components DH(x)[ek]DH(x)[e_k]DH(x)[ek​]; XH(x)=j0∇H(x)X_H(x)=j_0\nabla H(x)XH​(x)=j0​∇H(x).

Reeb field. RH(x)=λx(XH(x))−1 XH(x)R_H(x)=\lambda_x(X_H(x))^{-1}\,X_H(x)RH​(x)=λx​(XH​(x))−1XH​(x) (the zero vector where λx(XH(x))=0\lambda_x(X_H(x))=0λx​(XH​(x))=0). ξ\xiξ-membership: "v∈ξxv\in\xi_xv∈ξx​" means λx(v)=0\lambda_x(v)=0λx​(v)=0 and DH(x)[v]=0DH(x)[v]=0DH(x)[v]=0.

Strictly star-shaped level. H∈C∞(Vn)H\in C^\infty(V_n)H∈C∞(Vn​); for every u≠0u\ne0u=0 there is exactly one r>0r>0r>0 with H(ru)=1H(ru)=1H(ru)=1; and DH(x)[x]>0DH(x)[x]>0DH(x)[x]>0 whenever H(x)=1H(x)=1H(x)=1. The last clause forces H(0)≠1H(0)\ne1H(0)=1.

Compatible ξ\xiξ-structure. J:Vn→L(Vn,Vn)J:V_n\to\mathcal{L}(V_n,V_n)J:Vn​→L(Vn​,Vn​) is C∞C^\inftyC∞ on all of VnV_nVn​, and for all xxx with H(x)=1H(x)=1H(x)=1 and all v,w∈ξxv,w\in\xi_xv,w∈ξx​: Jxv∈ξxJ_xv\in\xi_xJx​v∈ξx​; JxJxv=−vJ_xJ_xv=-vJx​Jx​v=−v; if v≠0v\ne0v=0 then ω0(v,Jxv)>0\omega_0(v,J_xv)>0ω0​(v,Jx​v)>0; ω0(Jxv,Jxw)=ω0(v,w)\omega_0(J_xv,J_xw)=\omega_0(v,w)ω0​(Jx​v,Jx​w)=ω0​(v,w).

Radial coordinates. σH(y)\sigma_H(y)σH​(y) is a chosen r>0r>0r>0 with H(ry)=1H(ry)=1H(ry)=1 if one exists, and 111 otherwise. prH(y)=σH(y) y\mathrm{pr}_H(y)=\sigma_H(y)\,yprH​(y)=σH​(y)y and aH(y)=−12log⁡σH(y)a_H(y)=-\tfrac12\log\sigma_H(y)aH​(y)=−21​logσH​(y). (For star-shaped HHH: at y≠0y\ne0y=0 the rrr is unique; at y=0y=0y=0 the value is σH(0)=1\sigma_H(0)=1σH​(0)=1.)

Almost complex structure on VnV_nVn​. For y∈Vny\in V_ny∈Vn​ with x=prH(y)x=\mathrm{pr}_H(y)x=prH​(y), r=σH(y)r=\sigma_H(y)r=σH​(y), set α=r2DH(x)[x]DH(x)\alpha=\frac{r}{2DH(x)[x]}DH(x)α=2DH(x)[x]r​DH(x), β=rλx\beta=r\lambda_xβ=rλx​, and w(h)=h−α(h) 2y−β(h) r−1RH(x)w(h)=h-\alpha(h)\,2y-\beta(h)\,r^{-1}R_H(x)w(h)=h−α(h)2y−β(h)r−1RH​(x). Then

J~y(h)=α(h) r−1RH(x)−β(h) 2y+Jx(w(h)).\tilde J_y(h)=\alpha(h)\,r^{-1}R_H(x)-\beta(h)\,2y+J_x(w(h)).J~y​(h)=α(h)r−1RH​(x)−β(h)2y+Jx​(w(h)).

Finite energy curve on C\mathbb{C}C (only C\mathbb{C}C itself is used here). u:C→Vnu:\mathbb{C}\to V_nu:C→Vn​ with: u∈C∞u\in C^\inftyu∈C∞; u(z)≠0u(z)\ne0u(z)=0 for all zzz; uuu is differentiable at each zzz with ∂su(z)+J~u(z)∂tu(z)=0\partial_su(z)+\tilde J_{u(z)}\partial_tu(z)=0∂s​u(z)+J~u(z)​∂t​u(z)=0; and E(u)<∞E(u)<\inftyE(u)<∞, where

E(u)=sup⁡φ∫C[φ′(a)(∂sa λw(∂tw)−∂ta λw(∂sw))+φ(a) ω0(∂sw,∂tw)]+ dA,E(u)=\sup_\varphi\int_{\mathbb{C}}\big[\varphi'(a)\big(\partial_sa\,\lambda_w(\partial_tw)-\partial_ta\,\lambda_w(\partial_sw)\big)+\varphi(a)\,\omega_0(\partial_sw,\partial_tw)\big]^+\,dA,E(u)=φsup​∫C​[φ′(a)(∂s​aλw​(∂t​w)−∂t​aλw​(∂s​w))+φ(a)ω0​(∂s​w,∂t​w)]+dA,

with a=aH∘ua=a_H\circ ua=aH​∘u, w=prH∘uw=\mathrm{pr}_H\circ uw=prH​∘u, the supremum over C∞C^\inftyC∞ monotone (non-decreasing) φ:R→[0,1]\varphi:\mathbb{R}\to[0,1]φ:R→[0,1], and [⋅]+[\cdot]^+[⋅]+ the positive part (the integral is a [0,∞][0,\infty][0,∞]-valued Lebesgue integral).

dλd\lambdadλ-energy. For Ω⊆C\Omega\subseteq\mathbb{C}Ω⊆C: Edλ(Ω,u)=∫Ω[ω0(∂sw,∂tw)]+ dA∈[0,∞]E_{d\lambda}(\Omega,u)=\int_\Omega[\omega_0(\partial_sw,\partial_tw)]^+\,dA\in[0,\infty]Edλ​(Ω,u)=∫Ω​[ω0​(∂s​w,∂t​w)]+dA∈[0,∞], with w=prH∘uw=\mathrm{pr}_H\circ uw=prH​∘u.

Reeb orbit. A Reeb orbit PPP of HHH is a pair (xP,TP)(x_P,T_P)(xP​,TP​) with xP:R→Vnx_P:\mathbb{R}\to V_nxP​:R→Vn​, TP>0T_P>0TP​>0, H(xP(τ))=1H(x_P(\tau))=1H(xP​(τ))=1, xP′(τ)=RH(xP(τ))x_P'(\tau)=R_H(x_P(\tau))xP′​(τ)=RH​(xP​(τ)) and xP(τ+TP)=xP(τ)x_P(\tau+T_P)=x_P(\tau)xP​(τ+TP​)=xP​(τ) for all τ\tauτ. TPT_PTP​ is any positive period, not necessarily the minimal one, so covers are orbits. PPP is prime when xP(τ)≠xP(0)x_P(\tau)\ne x_P(0)xP​(τ)=xP​(0) for all τ∈(0,TP)\tau\in(0,T_P)τ∈(0,TP​).

Reeb trajectory. Any y:R→Vny:\mathbb{R}\to V_ny:R→Vn​ such that for every t∈Rt\in\mathbb{R}t∈R: H(y(t))=1H(y(t))=1H(y(t))=1 and yyy is differentiable at ttt with y′(t)=RH(y(t))y^\prime(t)=R_H(y(t))y′(t)=RH​(y(t)). Nothing excludes yyy from being periodic or from running along a Reeb orbit.

Nondegenerate orbit. For every Φ:R→L(Vn,Vn)\Phi:\mathbb{R}\to\mathcal{L}(V_n,V_n)Φ:R→L(Vn​,Vn​) with Φ(0)=id\Phi(0)=\mathrm{id}Φ(0)=id and Φ′(τ)=DRH(xQ(τ))∘Φ(τ)\Phi'(\tau)=DR_H(x_Q(\tau))\circ\Phi(\tau)Φ′(τ)=DRH​(xQ​(τ))∘Φ(τ) for all τ\tauτ, and every v∈ξxQ(0)v\in\xi_{x_Q(0)}v∈ξxQ​(0)​: Φ(TQ)v=v\Phi(T_Q)v=vΦ(TQ​)v=v implies v=0v=0v=0. (Vacuous if no such Φ\PhiΦ exists.)

Nondegenerate end at infinity on PPP (with sign +1+1+1; written "uuu has end on PPP"). There exist reals d,cd,cd,c and b>0b>0b>0 such that, as s→+∞s\to+\inftys→+∞ and uniformly in t∈Rt\in\mathbb{R}t∈R,

aH(u(e2π(s+it)))−TPs−d→0,ebs(prH(u(e2π(s+it)))−xP(TPt+c))→0.a_H\big(u(e^{2\pi(s+it)})\big)-T_Ps-d\to0,\qquad e^{bs}\big(\mathrm{pr}_H(u(e^{2\pi(s+it)}))-x_P(T_Pt+c)\big)\to0.aH​(u(e2π(s+it)))−TP​s−d→0,ebs(prH​(u(e2π(s+it)))−xP​(TP​t+c))→0.

Fast plane (IsFastPlane). u:C→V1u:\mathbb{C}\to V_1u:C→V1​ such that:

  1. uuu is a finite energy curve on C\mathbb{C}C;
  2. there exists a prime Reeb orbit P′P'P′ of HHH on which uuu has an end in the above sense;
  3. with w=prH∘uw=\mathrm{pr}_H\circ uw=prH​∘u and πu(z)=cH(w(z), ∂sw(z)−λw(z)(∂sw(z))RH(w(z)))∈C\pi_u(z)=\mathrm{c}_H\big(w(z),\ \partial_sw(z)-\lambda_{w(z)}(\partial_sw(z))R_H(w(z))\big)\in\mathbb{C}πu​(z)=cH​(w(z), ∂s​w(z)−λw(z)​(∂s​w(z))RH​(w(z)))∈C, the zero set ZZZ of πu\pi_uπu​ is finite, and there are integers idx(z)\mathrm{idx}(z)idx(z), z∈Zz\in Zz∈Z, summing to 000, such that for each z∈Zz\in Zz∈Z there is ρ0>0\rho_0>0ρ0​>0 with πu≠0\pi_u\ne0πu​=0 on Bˉ(z,ρ0)∖{z}\bar B(z,\rho_0)\setminus\{z\}Bˉ(z,ρ0​)∖{z} and, for each ρ∈(0,ρ0)\rho\in(0,\rho_0)ρ∈(0,ρ0​), the loop t↦πu(z+ρe2πit)t\mapsto\pi_u(z+\rho e^{2\pi it})t↦πu​(z+ρe2πit) has winding number idx(z)\mathrm{idx}(z)idx(z).

Here a loop f:R→Cf:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{C}f:R→C "has winding number kkk" when fff is continuous, 111-periodic, nowhere zero, and there is a continuous ϑ:R→R\vartheta:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}ϑ:R→R with f=∣f∣eiϑf=|f|e^{i\vartheta}f=∣f∣eiϑ and ϑ(1)−ϑ(0)=2πk\vartheta(1)-\vartheta(0)=2\pi kϑ(1)−ϑ(0)=2πk. An empty ZZZ satisfies clause 3; the definition allows nonempty ZZZ with indices of mixed sign summing to 000.

The coordinate cH(x,v)∈C\mathrm{c}_H(x,v)\in\mathbb{C}cH​(x,v)∈C is

cH(x,v)=ω0(v,f2(x))+i ω0(f1(x),v),fj(x)=∣x∣−1(Qj(x)−DH(x)[Qj(x)]DH(x)[x] x),\mathrm{c}_H(x,v)=\omega_0(v,f_2(x))+i\,\omega_0(f_1(x),v),\qquad f_j(x)=|x|^{-1}\Big(Q_j(x)-\frac{DH(x)[Q_j(x)]}{DH(x)[x]}\,x\Big),cH​(x,v)=ω0​(v,f2​(x))+iω0​(f1​(x),v),fj​(x)=∣x∣−1(Qj​(x)−DH(x)[x]DH(x)[Qj​(x)]​x),

for x,v∈R4x,v\in\mathbb{R}^4x,v∈R4, with ∣x∣|x|∣x∣ the Euclidean norm, Q1(x)=(x3,x2,−x1,−x0)Q_1(x)=(x_3,x_2,-x_1,-x_0)Q1​(x)=(x3​,x2​,−x1​,−x0​) and Q2(x)=(−x2,x3,x0,−x1)Q_2(x)=(-x_2,x_3,x_0,-x_1)Q2​(x)=(−x2​,x3​,x0​,−x1​).

Embedded plane. u:C→Vnu:\mathbb{C}\to V_nu:C→Vn​ is injective and Du(z)Du(z)Du(z) is an injective linear map for every zzz.

Set E(H,J,P,K,γ)\mathcal{E}(H,J,P,K,\gamma)E(H,J,P,K,γ) of embedded fast planes (K⊆V1K\subseteq V_1K⊆V1​, γ∈R\gamma\in\mathbb{R}γ∈R). All u:C→V1u:\mathbb{C}\to V_1u:C→V1​ that are fast planes, have end on PPP, are embedded planes, have u(0)∈Ku(0)\in Ku(0)∈K, and satisfy

Edλ({∣z∣>1},u)=max⁡(γ,0).E_{d\lambda}(\{|z|>1\},u)=\max(\gamma,0).Edλ​({∣z∣>1},u)=max(γ,0).

When γ≤0\gamma\le0γ≤0 this says the energy on {∣z∣>1}\{|z|>1\}{∣z∣>1} is 000. PPP is not itself required to be prime; the prime orbit P′P'P′ of the fast plane condition is a separate existential.

Cloc∞C^\infty_{\mathrm{loc}}Cloc∞​ convergence on C\mathbb{C}C. vk→vv_k\to vvk​→v means: for every compact K⊆CK\subseteq\mathbb{C}K⊆C and every m∈Nm\in\mathbb{N}m∈N, the mmm-th iterated Fréchet derivatives of vkv_kvk​ converge uniformly on KKK to that of vvv.

Sequential Cloc∞C^\infty_{\mathrm{loc}}Cloc∞​ compactness of a set AAA of maps C→V1\mathbb{C}\to V_1C→V1​. Every sequence in AAA has a subsequence (strictly increasing reindexing) converging in Cloc∞C^\infty_{\mathrm{loc}}Cloc∞​ on C\mathbb{C}C to some element of AAA. The empty set has this property.

Hypothesis "CZ index of QQQ is at least mmm" (IsCZAtLeast, for a Reeb orbit QQQ of H:V1→RH:V_1\to\mathbb{R}H:V1​→R, m∈Zm\in\mathbb{Z}m∈Z). Identify V1V_1V1​ with R4\mathbb{R}^4R4 and let R\mathcal{R}R be any periodic orbit of HHH for the Hamiltonian field: R=(xR,TR)\mathcal{R}=(x_{\mathcal{R}},T_{\mathcal{R}})R=(xR​,TR​), TR>0T_{\mathcal{R}}>0TR​>0, xR′=XH(xR)x_{\mathcal{R}}'=X_H(x_{\mathcal{R}})xR′​=XH​(xR​), H(xR)=1H(x_{\mathcal{R}})=1H(xR​)=1, xR(t+TR)=xR(t)x_{\mathcal{R}}(t+T_{\mathcal{R}})=x_{\mathcal{R}}(t)xR​(t+TR​)=xR​(t), where XH=(−∂1H,∂0H,−∂3H,∂2H)X_H=(-\partial_1H,\partial_0H,-\partial_3H,\partial_2H)XH​=(−∂1​H,∂0​H,−∂3​H,∂2​H). Then, for every such R\mathcal{R}R with the same image as QQQ and with action TQ=∫0TRλxR(xR′) dτT_Q=\int_0^{T_{\mathcal{R}}}\lambda_{x_{\mathcal{R}}}(x_{\mathcal{R}}')\,d\tauTQ​=∫0TR​​λxR​​(xR′​)dτ, and for every Y:R→L(R4,R4)Y:\mathbb{R}\to\mathcal{L}(\mathbb{R}^4,\mathbb{R}^4)Y:R→L(R4,R4) with Y(0)=idY(0)=\mathrm{id}Y(0)=id, Y′(t)=DXH(xR(t))∘Y(t)Y'(t)=DX_H(x_{\mathcal{R}}(t))\circ Y(t)Y′(t)=DXH​(xR​(t))∘Y(t), one has m≤cz(φ)m\le\mathrm{cz}(\varphi)m≤cz(φ). Here φ:R→M2(R)\varphi:\mathbb{R}\to M_2(\mathbb{R})φ:R→M2​(R) has entries

φ(τ)ij=(cHR2)i(xR(TRτ), prξ(Y(TRτ)f(j)(xR(0)))),\varphi(\tau)_{ij}=\Big(\mathrm{c}^{\mathbb{R}^2}_H\Big)_i\Big(x_{\mathcal{R}}(T_{\mathcal{R}}\tau),\ \mathrm{pr}^{\xi}\big(Y(T_{\mathcal{R}}\tau)f^{(j)}(x_{\mathcal{R}}(0))\big)\Big),φ(τ)ij​=(cHR2​)i​(xR​(TR​τ), prξ(Y(TR​τ)f(j)(xR​(0)))),

with cHR2\mathrm{c}_H^{\mathbb{R}^2}cHR2​ the real pair (Re cH,Im cH)(\mathrm{Re}\,\mathrm{c}_H,\mathrm{Im}\,\mathrm{c}_H)(RecH​,ImcH​), f(1)=f1f^{(1)}=f_1f(1)=f1​, f(2)=f2f^{(2)}=f_2f(2)=f2​, and prξ(v)=v−λx(v)λx(XH(x))XH(x)\mathrm{pr}^\xi(v)=v-\frac{\lambda_x(v)}{\lambda_x(X_H(x))}X_H(x)prξ(v)=v−λx​(XH​(x))λx​(v)​XH​(x) at x=xR(TRτ)x=x_{\mathcal{R}}(T_{\mathcal{R}}\tau)x=xR​(TR​τ). The integer cz(φ)\mathrm{cz}(\varphi)cz(φ) is: let WWW be the set of numbers (θ(1)−s)/(2π)(\theta(1)-s)/(2\pi)(θ(1)−s)/(2π) over s∈[0,2π]s\in[0,2\pi]s∈[0,2π] and θ\thetaθ continuous on [0,1][0,1][0,1] with θ(0)=s\theta(0)=sθ(0)=s and φ(t)(cos⁡s,sin⁡s)T=r(cos⁡θ(t),sin⁡θ(t))T\varphi(t)(\cos s,\sin s)^{\mathsf T}=r(\cos\theta(t),\sin\theta(t))^{\mathsf T}φ(t)(coss,sins)T=r(cosθ(t),sinθ(t))T for some r>0r>0r>0 for each t∈[0,1]t\in[0,1]t∈[0,1]; let a=inf⁡Wa=\inf Wa=infW, b=sup⁡Wb=\sup Wb=supW (with the convention that both equal 000 if WWW is empty, and each equals 000 if unbounded on its side). Then cz(φ)=2(⌈b⌉−1)\mathrm{cz}(\varphi)=2(\lceil b\rceil-1)cz(φ)=2(⌈b⌉−1) if a≤⌈b⌉−1a\le\lceil b\rceil-1a≤⌈b⌉−1, and cz(φ)=2⌈b⌉−1\mathrm{cz}(\varphi)=2\lceil b\rceil-1cz(φ)=2⌈b⌉−1 otherwise. The hypothesis is universally quantified over R\mathcal{R}R and YYY and so is vacuous if no such pair exists.

Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Nov 4, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by Mazecto · Nov 4, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paperProve2Me Team
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me