§5.3, pp. 20–21 — the retailer weakly gains from sharing iff k ≤ 1/2: Π^{NX_j}_R ≤ Π^{SX_j}_R for k ≤ 1/2, > for k > 1/2
ProvedCompetingChains.Cournot.retailer_profit_comparisoncournot-competitioninformation-sharingp2o-batch-pfp2ap2o-gran-per-chapterp2o-plan-paperp2o-v1supply-chain
Let , , , , and let be retailer 's equilibrium ex-ante profit under Cournot competition when chain has arrangement and chain has . Then for each :
- if , then ;
- if , then .
This determines whether the manufacturer must pay the retailer for its signal: no payment for , the payment for .
Formalization Note The page states both sentences for both competition types (); this item is the Cournot case .
Preamble
import Mathlib import Definitions.Def_CompetingChains_Cournot_Setting
Formal statement
namespace CompetingChains.Cournot
theorem retailer_profit_comparison (a c k γ t σsq : ℝ) (hk : 1 / 3 < k) (hγ0 : 0 ≤ γ)
(hγ1 : γ < 1) (ht : 0 < t) (hσ : 0 < σsq) :
(k ≤ 1 / 2 → ∀ Xj : Arrangement, PiR a c k γ t σsq .N Xj ≤ PiR a c k γ t σsq .S Xj) ∧
(1 / 2 < k → ∀ Xj : Arrangement, PiR a c k γ t σsq .S Xj < PiR a c k γ t σsq .N Xj) := by sorry
end CompetingChains.Cournot
Source
Ha, Tian & Tong, Information Sharing in Competing Supply Chains with Production Cost Reduction (MSOM 2017, pre-published version), pp. 20–21, §5.3, third and fourth paragraphs
Human review
Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).
Confirmed by the moderator at approval.