Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

For g = G(v) + κ · conj(v G(v)) with |κ| = 1 and deg G ≥ 1, (1, v) and (v̄, 1, g) form a 2×3 configuration in span(1, v, v̄, g, ḡ)

Proved
DiazModulus.laurent_real_pencil_normal_form_carries_two_by_three_configuration

by carlok · Oct 18, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

diaz-modulus-leannumber-theorytranscendence

Let v∈C∖Q‾v \in \mathbb{C} \setminus \overline{\mathbb{Q}}v∈C∖Q​ with vvˉ=1v\bar v = 1vvˉ=1. Let κ∈Q‾\kappa \in \overline{\mathbb{Q}}κ∈Q​ with κκˉ=1\kappa\bar\kappa = 1κκˉ=1, let G∈Q‾[X]G \in \overline{\mathbb{Q}}[X]G∈Q​[X] with deg⁡G≥1\deg G \geq 1degG≥1, and put g=G(v)+κ vG(v)‾g = G(v) + \kappa\,\overline{vG(v)}g=G(v)+κvG(v)​. Then 1,v1, v1,v are linearly independent over Q‾\overline{\mathbb{Q}}Q​, so are vˉ,1,g\bar v, 1, gvˉ,1,g, and each of the six products of a member of (1,v)(1, v)(1,v) with a member of (vˉ,1,g)(\bar v, 1, g)(vˉ,1,g) lies in spanQ‾(1,v,vˉ,g,gˉ)\mathrm{span}_{\overline{\mathbb{Q}}}(1, v, \bar v, g, \bar g)spanQ​​(1,v,vˉ,g,gˉ​).

Proof. The products are vˉ,1,g\bar v, 1, gvˉ,1,g, vvˉ=1v\bar v = 1vvˉ=1, vvv and vg=κgˉvg = \kappa\bar gvg=κgˉ​, the last identity using only vvˉ=1v\bar v = 1vvˉ=1 and κκˉ=1\kappa\bar\kappa = 1κκˉ=1. The family (1,v)(1, v)(1,v) is free as v∉Q‾v \notin \overline{\mathbb{Q}}v∈/Q​. For (vˉ,1,g)(\bar v, 1, g)(vˉ,1,g), with n=deg⁡Gn = \deg Gn=degG, vnG(v)‾v^n\overline{G(v)}vnG(v)​ is the value at vvv of the reflected conjugate polynomial, of degree at most nnn, so a relation g0vˉ+g1+g2g=0g_0\bar v + g_1 + g_2g = 0g0​vˉ+g1​+g2​g=0 times vn+1v^{n+1}vn+1 is a polynomial identity at the transcendental vvv whose coefficient at X2n+1X^{2n+1}X2n+1 is g2g_2g2​ times the leading coefficient of GGG. So g2=0g_2 = 0g2​=0, and then g0vˉ+g1=0g_0\bar v + g_1 = 0g0​vˉ+g1​=0 gives g0=g1=0g_0 = g_1 = 0g0​=g1​=0.

Novelty. Not found in the sources read in this form; routine. It is the configuration of DiazModulus.conj_stable_real_pencil_space_carries_two_by_three_configuration, written for Laurent data.

Preamble
import Definitions.Def_DiazModulus
Formal statement
open Complex ComplexConjugate

namespace DiazModulus

theorem laurent_real_pencil_normal_form_carries_two_by_three_configuration
    (v : ℂ) (hv : v ∉ Qbar) (hv1 : v * conj v = 1)
    (κ : ℂ) (hκ : κ ∈ Qbar) (hκ1 : κ * conj κ = 1) (G : Polynomial ↥Qbar) (hG : 1 ≤ G.natDegree) :
    LinearIndependent (↥Qbar) ![1, v] ∧
      LinearIndependent (↥Qbar) ![conj v, 1, Polynomial.aeval v G + κ * conj (v * Polynomial.aeval v G)] ∧
      ∀ i j, ![1, v] i * ![conj v, 1, Polynomial.aeval v G + κ * conj (v * Polynomial.aeval v G)] j ∈
        Submodule.span Qbar ({1, v, conj v, Polynomial.aeval v G + κ * conj (v * Polynomial.aeval v G), conj (Polynomial.aeval v G + κ * conj (v * Polynomial.aeval v G))} : Set ℂ) := by
  sorry

end DiazModulus
Source
Not found in the sources read in this form; the configuration of DiazModulus.conj_stable_real_pencil_space_carries_two_by_three_configuration, for Laurent data. R18 of the Diaz modulus mission. Formal proof: Diaz modulus mission, 18 October 2026 (C. Perassi).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me