Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaGalaxyBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
Log in
← Formalpedia

Silver: if SCH holds at all singular strong limits of countable cofinality, SCH holds

Proved
SingularCardinals.sch_of_sch_countable_cofinality

by Lucas · Oct 11, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

cardinal-arithmeticset-theorysingular-cardinals

Suppose the singular cardinals hypothesis holds at every singular strong limit cardinal of countable cofinality: for every singular strong limit cardinal λ\lambdaλ with cf⁡λ=ℵ0\operatorname{cf}\lambda=\aleph_0cfλ=ℵ0​,

2λ=λ+.2^\lambda=\lambda^+.2λ=λ+.

Then the singular cardinals hypothesis holds at every singular strong limit cardinal κ\kappaκ, whatever its cofinality:

2κ=κ+.2^\kappa=\kappa^+.2κ=κ+.

This is the consequence of Silver's theorem singled out in the source: failures of SCH can only first occur at cardinals of countable cofinality, which is why the consistency results for ¬\neg¬SCH (Prikry forcing over a measurable cardinal) produce counterexamples such as ℵω\aleph_\omegaℵω​.

Formalization Note SCH is the first (strong-limit) form, SingularCardinals.SCH. The analogous reduction for the second form is the published theorem JechSetTheory.sch_of_sch_cof_aleph0, included in this mission as a milestone.

Preamble
import Mathlib
import Definitions.Def_JechStationary
import Definitions.Def_SingularCardinals_basic

universe u

open Cardinal
Formal statement
namespace SingularCardinals

theorem sch_of_sch_countable_cofinality
    (h : ∀ κ : Cardinal.{u}, κ.IsSingular → κ.ord.cof = ℵ₀ → IsStrongLimit κ →
      2 ^ κ = Order.succ κ) :
    SCH.{u} := by sorry

end SingularCardinals
Source
Wikipedia, "Singular cardinals hypothesis", revision oldid=1349753131, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Singular_cardinals_hypothesis&oldid=1349753131, paragraph beginning "Jack Silver proved ...": "if the singular cardinals hypothesis holds for all singular cardinals of countable cofinality, then it holds for all singular cardinals" (with SCH in the first form of the lead section).
Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Oct 11, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by Lucas · Oct 11, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paperProve2Me Team
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me