Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Globally optimized gain with a fixed pure TMSS

Open
QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P89.optimizedTMSSGain

by Gohan · Nov 1, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

prove2quantum

Let λ>0\lambda>0λ>0, r≥0r\ge0r≥0, both finite. Fix the normalized pure TMSS with covariance blocks A=B=cosh⁡(2r)IA=B=\cosh(2r)IA=B=cosh(2r)I, C=−sinh⁡(2r)σzC=-\sinh(2r)\sigma_zC=−sinh(2r)σz​, logarithmic negativity 2r2r2r, and finite per-mode photon number sinh⁡2r\sinh^2rsinh2r. For every gain g>0g>0g>0 its BK map exists on every input density and is the phase-insensitive channel with

τ=g2,y=(1+g2)cosh⁡(2r)−2gsinh⁡(2r).\tau=g^2,\qquad y=(1+g^2)\cosh(2r)-2g\sinh(2r).τ=g2,y=(1+g2)cosh(2r)−2gsinh(2r).

The actual Gaussian-prior average fidelity, globally optimized over all positive gains, is attained at

gopt=2+λsinh⁡(2r)2+λ+λcosh⁡(2r)>0,F‾TMSS=sech⁡2r+λ2+λ−2tanh⁡r.g_{\rm opt}=\frac{2+\lambda\sinh(2r)}{2+\lambda+\lambda\cosh(2r)}>0,\qquad \overline F_{\rm TMSS}=\frac{\operatorname{sech}^2r+\lambda}{2+\lambda-2\tanh r}.gopt​=2+λ+λcosh(2r)2+λsinh(2r)​>0,FTMSS​=2+λ−2tanhrsech2r+λ​.

The attainable fidelity set has the displayed greatest element, and its independently defined supremum equals that value. The resource is fixed before the gain and before all input states.

This optimizes gain at fixed squeezing, unlike (10), which minimizes squeezing for a fixed channel.

Preamble
import Definitions.Def_QAlgorithms_Papers_Independent_Intakethird100_P89
Formal statement
noncomputable section

open MeasureTheory Filter

open scoped BigOperators ENNReal Topology ComplexOrder

attribute [local instance] Classical.propDecidable Classical.decEq

namespace QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P89

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Dependency50.P33
  (State IsDensity IsTraceClassChannel tensorApply traceSize)

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Dependency50.P39
  (coherentKet coherentCoefficient operatorOfMatrix husimiQ HasFockMatrix CoherentRealized)

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Frontier30.P14 (weylCharacteristic)

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Claimed50.P19
  (Cov FockIndex DensityKernel PhysicalCovariance CharacteristicSummable
   multimodeWeylTrace covarianceCharacteristicValue standardFormCovariance)

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Frontier30.P08 (QuadratureIndex)

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Gap48.P26 (PhaseInsensitive coherentKernel)

open QAlgorithms.Entanglement (partialTransposeFirst)

/-- PDF p.4, (16): a fixed normalized TMSS precedes the optimization over
all g>0. The closed value is globally maximal and is attained at the stated gain. -/
theorem optimizedTMSSGain (lambda r : ℝ) (hlambda : 0 < lambda) (hr : 0 ≤ r) :
    0 < tmssOptimalGain lambda r ∧
    IsGreatest (tmssValues lambda r) (tmssClosedForm lambda r) ∧
    tmssOptimum lambda r = tmssClosedForm lambda r ∧
    (∃ rho : State (ℕ × ℕ),
      rho.coefficients = tmssKernel r ∧
      CenteredResource rho (standardFormCovariance (Real.cosh (2 * r)) (Real.cosh (2 * r))
        (-Real.sinh (2 * r)) (Real.sinh (2 * r))) ∧
      traceSize (partialTransposeFirst rho.coefficients) = ENNReal.ofReal (Real.exp (2 * r)) ∧
      twoModeMeanPhotonEnergy rho = ENNReal.ofReal (Real.sinh r ^ 2) ∧ twoModeMeanPhotonEnergy rho < ⊤ ∧
      (∀ g : ℝ, 0 < g → ∃ Phi : OscillatorChannel,
        IsBK rho g Phi ∧ PhaseInsensitive Phi (g ^ 2) (tmssNoise g r) ∧
        gaussianPriorFidelity lambda Phi = phaseInsensitiveFidelityFormula lambda (g ^ 2) (tmssNoise g r)) ∧
      (∃ Phi : OscillatorChannel, IsBK rho (tmssOptimalGain lambda r) Phi ∧
        gaussianPriorFidelity lambda Phi = tmssClosedForm lambda r)) := by sorry

end QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P89

end
Source
Optimal continuous variable quantum teleportation with limited resources, arXiv:1705.03017v5, PDF p. 4, Optimized-gain fidelity with a fixed TMSS resource, Eq. (16)
Read-back

What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · gpt-6.1-sol

For every real λ>0\lambda>0λ>0 and r≥0r\ge0r≥0, define

g∗=2+λsinh⁡(2r)2+λ+λcosh⁡(2r),L=cosh⁡(r)−2+λ2+λ−2tanh⁡r.g_*=\frac{2+\lambda\sinh(2r)}{2+\lambda+\lambda\cosh(2r)}, \qquad L=\frac{\cosh(r)^{-2}+\lambda}{2+\lambda-2\tanh r}.g∗​=2+λ+λcosh(2r)2+λsinh(2r)​,L=2+λ−2tanhrcosh(r)−2+λ​.

Then g∗>0g_*>0g∗​>0. To specify the value set, write HI=ℓ2(I;C)H_I=\ell^2(I;\mathbb C)HI​=ℓ2(I;C); a trace-class kernel admits Xij=∑kuk(i)vk(j)‾X_{ij}=\sum_k u_k(i)\overline{v_k(j)}Xij​=∑k​uk​(i)vk​(j)​ with uk,vk∈HIu_k,v_k\in H_Iuk​,vk​∈HI​ and ∑k∥uk∥∥vk∥<∞\sum_k\|u_k\|\|v_k\|<\infty∑k​∥uk​∥∥vk​∥<∞, and a density kernel additionally has real nonnegative finite quadratic forms and a summable real diagonal of sum one. A channel here preserves trace-class kernels, is additive and complex homogeneous on them, and preserves density kernels under each finite first-factor ampliation, including the vacuous dimension-zero test. Put

tr(a)=1a0=a1(−tanh⁡r)a0cosh⁡r,Dmn(z)=e−∣z∣2/2m!n!∑j=0min⁡(m,n)zm−j(−z‾)n−jj!(m−j)!(n−j)!,t_r(a)=\mathbf1_{a_0=a_1}\frac{(-\tanh r)^{a_0}}{\cosh r}, \quad D_{mn}(z)=e^{-|z|^2/2}\sqrt{m!n!} \sum_{j=0}^{\min(m,n)} \frac{z^{m-j}(-\overline z)^{n-j}}{j!(m-j)!(n-j)!},tr​(a)=1a0​=a1​​coshr(−tanhr)a0​​,Dmn​(z)=e−∣z∣2/2m!n!​j=0∑min(m,n)​j!(m−j)!(n−j)!zm−j(−z)n−j​, χX(z)=∑m∑nXmnDnm(z),χR(2)(v)=∑a∑bRab∏j=01Dbjaj ⁣(−vj,1+ivj,02).\chi_X(z)=\sum_m\sum_nX_{mn}D_{nm}(z),\qquad \chi_R^{(2)}(v)=\sum_a\sum_bR_{ab} \prod_{j=0}^1D_{b_ja_j}\!\left(\frac{-v_{j,1}+iv_{j,0}}{\sqrt2}\right).χX​(z)=m∑​n∑​Xmn​Dnm​(z),χR(2)​(v)=a∑​b∑​Rab​j=0∏1​Dbj​aj​​(2​−vj,1​+ivj,0​​).

Set cα(n)=e−∣α∣2/2αn/n!c_\alpha(n)=e^{-|\alpha|^2/2}\alpha^n/\sqrt{n!}cα​(n)=e−∣α∣2/2αn/n!​ and Pα=cαcα∗P_\alpha=c_\alpha c_\alpha^*Pα​=cα​cα∗​; let hαh_\alphahα​ be a chosen square-summable vector with coefficients cαc_\alphacα​, or zero if none exists, and let O(X)O(X)O(X) be a chosen bounded operator with matrix XXX, or zero if none exists. Define

Fλ(Φ)=∫Cλπe−λ∣α∣2Re⁡⟨hα,O(Φ(Pα))hα⟩ dα.\mathcal F_\lambda(\Phi)= \int_{\mathbb C}\frac{\lambda}{\pi}e^{-\lambda|\alpha|^2} \operatorname{Re}\langle h_\alpha,O(\Phi(P_\alpha))h_\alpha\rangle\,d\alpha.Fλ​(Φ)=∫C​πλ​e−λ∣α∣2Re⟨hα​,O(Φ(Pα​))hα​⟩dα.

Consider all these real values for which there exist a two-mode density kernel RRR with Rab=tr(a)tr(b)‾R_{ab}=t_r(a)\overline{t_r(b)}Rab​=tr​(a)tr​(b)​, a real g>0g>0g>0, and a channel Φ\PhiΦ such that, for every one-mode density kernel SSS and z∈Cz\in\mathbb Cz∈C,

χΦ(S)(z)=χS(gz) χR(2)(2gIm⁡z,2gRe⁡z,2Im⁡z,−2Re⁡z).\chi_{\Phi(S)}(z)=\chi_S(gz)\, \chi_R^{(2)}(\sqrt2g\operatorname{Im}z,\sqrt2g\operatorname{Re}z, \sqrt2\operatorname{Im}z,-\sqrt2\operatorname{Re}z).χΦ(S)​(z)=χS​(gz)χR(2)​(2​gImz,2​gRez,2​Imz,−2​Rez).

The number LLL is a member of this value set, is at least every member, and equals its real supremum. Furthermore, there exists such a density kernel RRR whose centered covariance is

V=(cosh⁡(2r)0−sinh⁡(2r)00cosh⁡(2r)0sinh⁡(2r)−sinh⁡(2r)0cosh⁡(2r)00sinh⁡(2r)0cosh⁡(2r)).V= \begin{pmatrix} \cosh(2r)&0&-\sinh(2r)&0\\ 0&\cosh(2r)&0&\sinh(2r)\\ -\sinh(2r)&0&\cosh(2r)&0\\ 0&\sinh(2r)&0&\cosh(2r) \end{pmatrix}.V=​cosh(2r)0−sinh(2r)0​0cosh(2r)0sinh(2r)​−sinh(2r)0cosh(2r)0​0sinh(2r)0cosh(2r)​​.

Explicitly, VVV is symmetric positive definite, V+idiag⁡(J,J)V+i\operatorname{diag}(J,J)V+idiag(J,J) is positive semidefinite for J=(01−10)J=\left(\begin{smallmatrix}0&1\\-1&0\end{smallmatrix}\right)J=(0−1​10​), every inner and outer series defining χR(2)(v)\chi_R^{(2)}(v)χR(2)​(v) is summable, and χR(2)(v)=e−vTVv/4\chi_R^{(2)}(v)=e^{-v^TVv/4}χR(2)​(v)=e−vTVv/4 for every real vvv. With N(X)N(X)N(X) the extended-nonnegative infimum of the norm-product sums in its trace-class expansions, and R(a,b),(c,d)Γ=R(c,b),(a,d)R^\Gamma_{(a,b),(c,d)}=R_{(c,b),(a,d)}R(a,b),(c,d)Γ​=R(c,b),(a,d)​, this resource satisfies

N(RΓ)=[e2r]+,∑p[p0+p12Re⁡Rpp]+=[sinh⁡2r]+<∞.N(R^\Gamma)=[e^{2r}]_+,\qquad \sum_p\left[\frac{p_0+p_1}{2}\operatorname{Re}R_{pp}\right]_+ =[\sinh^2r]_+<\infty.N(RΓ)=[e2r]+​,p∑​[2p0​+p1​​ReRpp​]+​=[sinh2r]+​<∞.

Here [x]+=max⁡(x,0)[x]_+=\max(x,0)[x]+​=max(x,0) in [0,∞][0,\infty][0,∞]. For every real gain g>0g>0g>0 there exists a channel Φ\PhiΦ satisfying the preceding resource identity and, with

T(g,r)=(1+g2)cosh⁡(2r)−2gsinh⁡(2r),T(g,r)=(1+g^2)\cosh(2r)-2g\sinh(2r),T(g,r)=(1+g2)cosh(2r)−2gsinh(2r),

also satisfying ∣g2−1∣≤T(g,r)|g^2-1|\le T(g,r)∣g2−1∣≤T(g,r) and

χΦ(S)(z)=χS(g2 z)e−T(g,r)∣z∣2/2,Fλ(Φ)=2λ2(1−g2)2+λ(1+T(g,r)+g2)\chi_{\Phi(S)}(z)=\chi_S(\sqrt{g^2}\,z)e^{-T(g,r)|z|^2/2}, \qquad \mathcal F_\lambda(\Phi)= \frac{2\lambda}{2(1-\sqrt{g^2})^2+\lambda(1+T(g,r)+g^2)}χΦ(S)​(z)=χS​(g2​z)e−T(g,r)∣z∣2/2,Fλ​(Φ)=2(1−g2​)2+λ(1+T(g,r)+g2)2λ​

for every density SSS and every zzz. Finally, there exists a channel satisfying the resource identity at gain g∗g_*g∗​ and having Fλ(Φ)=L\mathcal F_\lambda(\Phi)=LFλ​(Φ)=L. All assertions include r=0r=0r=0; uniqueness of a maximizing gain or channel is not asserted.

Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Nov 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by Gohan · Nov 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me