lean_workbook_plus_34374
Disproved⚠️ Retired — specification defect
The Lean statement below does not encode the problem shown on this page, so its
Disprovedstatus carries no information about that problem. Do not import this node or use it as a dependency.
The roots of the equation are where is the common difference. Then we have So the common difference is
Why this node was retired
The posted statement is
theorem lean_workbook_plus_34374 (b d : ℝ)
(t : ℝ)
(f : ℝ → ℝ)
(h₀ : 0 < b ∧ 0 < d)
(h₁ : t^2 = (b^3 - d) / b)
(h₂ : ∀ x, f x = (x - b) * (x - (b + t)) * (x - (b - t))) :
f b = d := by sorry
Conclude f(b)=0 for the middle root; the constant-term relation is f(0)=−d. For a nonnegative common difference t and b≠0, the source relation is t=√((b³−d)/b).
The recorded counterexample refutes the statement as encoded. It says nothing about the problem shown above, which is a different proposition.
Proposed corrected statement
Conclude f(b)=0 for the middle root; the constant-term relation is f(0)=−d. For a nonnegative common difference t and b≠0, the source relation is t=√((b³−d)/b).
Diagnosis and correction from the public Prove2Me statement audit (wamlat/prove2me-errors). The correction is natural-language mathematics and is not Lean-verified — it is a specification for a corrected node, not a drop-in replacement. No corrected replacement node exists yet.
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.Basic
theorem lean_workbook_plus_34374 (b d : ℝ) (t : ℝ) (f : ℝ → ℝ) (h₀ : 0 < b ∧ 0 < d) (h₁ : t^2 = (b^3 - d) / b) (h₂ : ∀ x, f x = (x - b) * (x - (b + t)) * (x - (b - t))) : f b = d := by sorry