Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Section 3, inequality (5) — no solution in (0,.1](0,.1](0,.1], a solution in (.1,.2)(.1,.2)(.1,.2)

Proved
SzemerediTrotter.Incidence.inequality_5_no_solution

by mikedeng1 · Sep 29, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

discrete-geometryp2o-batch-p200bp2o-gran-per-chapterp2o-plan-paperp2o-v1real-inequalities

Consider the function

f(x)=x2/3+1−x100+2−1/3(1−x)2/3.f(x) = x^{2/3} + \frac{1-x}{100} + 2^{-1/3}(1-x)^{2/3}.f(x)=x2/3+1001−x​+2−1/3(1−x)2/3.
  1. For every real xxx with 0<x≤0.10 < x \le 0.10<x≤0.1 one has f(x)≤1f(x) \le 1f(x)≤1; that is, inequality (5) of Szemerédi and Trotter, 1<f(x0)1 < f(x_0)1<f(x0​), has no solution in the interval (0,0.1](0, 0.1](0,0.1].
  2. There is a real xxx with 0.1<x<0.20.1 < x < 0.20.1<x<0.2 and 1<f(x)1 < f(x)1<f(x); that is, inequality (5) does have a solution in (0.1,0.2)(0.1, 0.2)(0.1,0.2).

In the proof of Theorem 1 the first part shows that the set P0\mathcal P_0P0​ of points incident with many lines from both halves of the slope-ordered family has at least a tenth of the points. The second part is the paper's parenthetical remark that the threshold 0.10.10.1 cannot be raised to 0.20.20.2 by this inequality alone.

Formalization Note All powers are Real.rpow with real exponents 2/32/32/3 and −1/3-1/3−1/3; on the stated ranges all bases are positive.

Preamble
import Mathlib
Formal statement
namespace SzemerediTrotter.Incidence

/-- Section 3, inequality (5), p. 385: `1 < x₀^{2/3} + (1 − x₀)/100 + 2^{−1/3}(1 − x₀)^{2/3}`
has no solution in `(0, .1]`, and it has a solution in `(.1, .2)`. -/
theorem inequality_5_no_solution :
    (∀ x : ℝ, 0 < x → x ≤ 0.1 →
      x ^ (2 / 3 : ℝ) + (1 - x) / 100 + (2 : ℝ) ^ (-(1 / 3) : ℝ) * (1 - x) ^ (2 / 3 : ℝ) ≤ 1) ∧
    (∃ x : ℝ, 0.1 < x ∧ x < 0.2 ∧
      1 < x ^ (2 / 3 : ℝ) + (1 - x) / 100 + (2 : ℝ) ^ (-(1 / 3) : ℝ) * (1 - x) ^ (2 / 3 : ℝ)) := by sorry

end SzemerediTrotter.Incidence
Source
Szemerédi, Trotter, Extremal Problems in Discrete Geometry, Combinatorica 3 (1983), p. 385, Section 3, inequality (5) and the sentence following it (printed as "inequality (2)", a misprint for (5))
Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Oct 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by mikedeng1 · Oct 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me