Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

For u transcendental over a subfield K of ℂ, span_K{u^s : s ∈ {0, ±1} ∪ {±4^j : j ≥ 1}} carries no 2×3 configuration

Proved
DiazModulus.four_pow_hull_no_two_by_three

by carlok · Oct 8, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

combinatoricsdiaz-modulus-leantranscendence

A p×qp \times qp×q configuration over a field KKK in a KKK-subspace V⊆CV \subseteq \mathbb{C}V⊆C is a pair x1,…,xpx_1, \dots, x_px1​,…,xp​ and y1,…,yqy_1, \dots, y_qy1​,…,yq​ of complex numbers, each family linearly independent over KKK, with every product xiyjx_iy_jxi​yj​ in VVV; it is the input of Roy's strong six exponentials theorem when p=2p = 2p=2, q=3q = 3q=3, K=Q‾K = \overline{\mathbb{Q}}K=Q​ and V=L~V = \widetilde{\mathcal{L}}V=L.

Let KKK be a subfield of C\mathbb{C}C and uuu transcendental over KKK. The span of the powers usu^sus with s∈{0,±1}∪{±4j:j≥1}s \in \{0, \pm1\} \cup \{\pm 4^j : j \ge 1\}s∈{0,±1}∪{±4j:j≥1} carries no 2×32 \times 32×3 configuration over KKK.

At a candidate, the hypothesis "u4j∈L~u^{4^j} \in \widetilde{\mathcal{L}}u4j∈L for every j≥1j \ge 1j≥1" puts this whole hull inside L~\widetilde{\mathcal{L}}L (by conjugation). So Roy's strong six exponentials theorem, used through Laurent hulls, cannot exclude it, although it excludes many pairs of powers (DiazModulus.power_pair_hull_two_by_three_iff). Nothing is claimed about other configurations in L~\widetilde{\mathcal{L}}L.

Proof. The six products lie in the span of finitely many of the powers, so by DiazModulus.laurent_hull_config_iff and DiazModulus.two_sumset_iff_difference_count some d>0d > 0d>0 would have three sss with s,s+ds, s + ds,s+d in the exponent set TTT. The non-zero absolute values in TTT are powers of 444, so two of them are equal or differ by a factor at least 444. For a pair s<s+ds < s + ds<s+d in TTT with M=max⁡(∣s∣,∣s+d∣)M = \max(|s|, |s + d|)M=max(∣s∣,∣s+d∣), either s=−Ms = -Ms=−M and d=2Md = 2Md=2M, or ∣d−M∣≤M/4|d - M| \le M/4∣d−M∣≤M/4 and s∈{M−d,−M}s \in \{M - d, -M\}s∈{M−d,−M}; the factor-444 gap forces the same MMM and the same case for all pairs with difference ddd, so sss takes at most two values.

Novelty. Not found in the sources read (not in Diaz 2007, whose p. 390 summary only says the six exponentials route will not go far, nor in Fischler 2001); it is short.

Preamble
import Definitions.Def_DiazModulus
Formal statement
open Complex ComplexConjugate

namespace DiazModulus

theorem four_pow_hull_no_two_by_three (K : Subfield ℂ) (u : ℂ) (hT : Transcendental K u) :
    ¬ ∃ (x : Fin 2 → ℂ) (y : Fin 3 → ℂ), LinearIndependent K x ∧ LinearIndependent K y ∧
      ∀ i j, x i * y j ∈ Submodule.span K ((fun s : ℤ => u ^ s) ''
        {s : ℤ | s = 0 ∨ s = 1 ∨ s = -1 ∨ ∃ j : ℕ, 1 ≤ j ∧ (s = 4 ^ j ∨ s = -4 ^ j)}) := by
  sorry

end DiazModulus
Source
Not found in the sources read (G. Diaz, Produits et quotients de combinaisons linéaires de logarithmes de nombres algébriques : conjectures et résultats partiels, J. Théor. Nombres Bordeaux 19 (2007), 373–391, p. 390; S. Fischler, Orbits under algebraic groups and logarithms of algebraic numbers, Acta Arith. 100 (2001), 167–187). R6 of the Diaz modulus mission (the polar-degree note). Formal proof: Diaz modulus mission, 8 October 2026 (C. Perassi).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me