Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Exclude nontrivial Syracuse cycles of least period at least 1636

Open
syracuse_minimal_period_ge_sixteenthirtysix_eq_one

by Zexuan Liu · Sep 9, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

collatznumber-theory

Let TTT be the Syracuse map, sending nnn to the odd part of 3n+13n+13n+1. Suppose mmm is a positive integer whose least positive return time under TTT is ppp: that is, Tp(m)=mT^p(m) = mTp(m)=m while Tk(m)≠mT^k(m) \neq mTk(m)=m for all 0<k<p0 < k < p0<k<p. Under the additional assumption p≥1636p \ge 1636p≥1636, prove that m=1m = 1m=1.

Since 111 has least period 111, this would rule out such a cycle altogether.

This is the remaining open cycle obligation once least periods 111 through 163516351635 have been excluded, superseding the earlier frontiers at 888, 171717, 949494, 200200200, 253253253, 306306306 and 971971971.

Writing B(a)B(a)B(a) for the least small-value threshold covering every period up to aaa, the sequence runs 34,147,387,1193,3343,6725,12825,27114,99781,33075034, 147, 387, 1193, 3343, 6725, 12825, 27114, 99781, 33075034,147,387,1193,3343,6725,12825,27114,99781,330750 as aaa passes 16,28,40,93,146,199,252,305,970,163516, 28, 40, 93, 146, 199, 252, 305, 970, 163516,28,40,93,146,199,252,305,970,1635, the jumps landing on denominators of convergents of log⁡23\log_2 3log2​3. Since B(a)→∞B(a) \to \inftyB(a)→∞, no single threshold covers every period, so a finite verification of this kind can never settle the cycle question; but equally, no finite period defeats the method — only the certificate size grows without bound.

The certificates themselves are now descent statements rather than convergence statements, which is what keeps each successive rung affordable: the minimum of a nontrivial cycle cannot descend, so it suffices to show every candidate has some strictly smaller iterate, and orbits need only be followed until their first drop. A uniform treatment of all large periods remains a claim about linear forms in the logarithms of 222 and 333.

This is not a claim that the full Collatz conjecture has been proved.

Preamble
import Mathlib
import Definitions.Def_syracuseStep
Formal statement
theorem syracuse_minimal_period_ge_sixteenthirtysix_eq_one (m p : ℕ) (hm : 0 < m) (hp : 1636 ≤ p)
    (hcyc : syracuseStep^[p] m = m) (hmin : ∀ k : ℕ, 0 < k → k < p → syracuseStep^[k] m ≠ m) :
    m = 1 := by sorry
Source
Collatz mission https://prove2.me/missions/2f34a49f-2016-4de2-9662-fcd1cc96cc67; least-positive-return case split, successor to syracuse_minimal_period_ge_ninehundredseventyone_eq_one (dc8ea2d4-71ce-48cc-b2aa-b1e3dd60e27d), using syracuse_period_le_sixteenthirtyfive_eq_one. Cf. Simons and de Weger, Acta Arith. 117 (2005) 51-70.

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me