Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

A prime quotient trajectory closes after two lifts

Proved
BirkhoffGlobalSection.antipodal_trajectory_double_lift_is_double_cover

by Yivy Yu · Sep 12, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

celestial-mechanicsdynamical-systemshamiltonian-dynamics

Let a prime trajectory in the antipodal quotient have period PPP, represented by a Levi-Civita lift xxx with

φP(x)=−x,\varphi_P(x)=-x,φP​(x)=−x,

and suppose no time 0<t<P0<t<P0<t<P reaches either xxx or −x-x−x. If the antipodal action is free and the flow is equivariant, traversing the trajectory twice produces a closed Levi-Civita orbit of least period 2P2P2P, with its antipodal point reached at half-period.

This isolates the elementary covering-space step from Birkhoff's geometric shooting theorem and from the open global-section assertion.

Preamble
import Definitions.Def_BirkhoffGlobalSection
Formal statement
namespace BirkhoffGlobalSection

/-- A prime antipodally closed trajectory becomes a least-period closed orbit
after traversing it twice on a free Levi-Civita cover. -/
theorem antipodal_trajectory_double_lift_is_double_cover {μ c : ℝ}
    (φ : Flow ℝ (LeftEnergyState μ c))
    (hanti : IsAntipodallyEquivariantFlow μ c φ)
    (hfree : IsAntipodallyFreeComponent μ c)
    (δ : AntipodalPeriodicTrajectory φ) :
    IsAntipodalDoubleCover φ
      (antipodalTrajectoryDoubleLift φ hanti δ) := by sorry

end BirkhoffGlobalSection
Source
Elementary covering-space consequence of the free antipodal double cover in Joung--van Koert, Proposition 2.4, https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.19159v3.
Read-back

What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · OpenAI Codex

Read-back model: OpenAI Codex. File SHA-256: a15b4e37bb4f7ae6a06d699c175a38b9a185320f0cc8e74ef5381ea6173fd054. This declaration is an admitted by sorry goal, not a proved theorem. It universally quantifies over implicit real μ,cμ,cμ,c, a real flow φφφ on the selected-component subtype, a proof that every existing antipodal pair evolves antipodally, a proof that no state equals its own negative, and an AntipodalPeriodicTrajectory δδδ. Writing its point as xxx and period as PPP, the trajectory data say P>0P>0P>0, φP(x)=−xφ_P(x)=-xφP​(x)=−x, and for every 0<t<P0<t<P0<t<P, φt(x)φ_t(x)φt​(x) is neither xxx nor −x-x−x. Equivariance is used by antipodalTrajectoryDoubleLift to form a PeriodicOrbit γγγ with point xxx, recorded period 2P2P2P, and φ2P(x)=xφ_{2P}(x)=xφ2P​(x)=x. The conclusion says γγγ has no return to xxx at any 0<t<2P0<t<2P0<t<2P and reaches −x-x−x at half its recorded period, namely at PPP. It does not assume global component invariance and does not assert quotient continuity, quotient primeness, geometric winding, an astronomical sign, or a page.

Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Sep 12, 2026

  • Endorsed by Yivy Yu · Sep 12, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me