(A-4)–(A-6) — pooling all dedicated capacity into the flexible resource never lowers terminal wealth
ProvedMixFlex.Reliable.wealth_gap_nonnegflexibilitynewsvendorp2o-batch-p200ap2o-gran-per-chapterp2o-plan-paperp2o-v1stochastic-dominance
Consider the SD and SF networks with perfectly reliable resources, a common margin and a common marginal cost for every resource, the flexible one included. Take any dedicated investment and let the flexible network invest the total . For every demand realization the terminal wealths (A-4)–(A-5) satisfy
This pathwise comparison is the whole content of the paper's proof of Proposition 4: every later step compares distributions or objectives derived from it.
Formalization Note The statement is pointwise in the sample point and needs no sign condition on or on demand; the inequality holds for all reals.
Preamble
import Mathlib import Definitions.Def_MixFlex_Reliable_Model
Formal statement
namespace MixFlex.Reliable
theorem wealth_gap_nonneg (P : Params) (hP : P.Standing) {N : ℕ} {Ω : Type*}
(X : Ω → Fin N → ℝ) (K : Fin N → ℝ) (ω : Ω) :
wealthSF P X P.c (∑ n, K n) ω - wealthSD P X K ω =
P.p * (min (∑ n, X ω n) (∑ n, K n) - ∑ n, min (X ω n) (K n)) ∧
0 ≤ wealthSF P X P.c (∑ n, K n) ω - wealthSD P X K ω := by sorry
end MixFlex.Reliable
Source
Tomlin and Wang, On the value of mix flexibility and dual sourcing in unreliable newsvendor networks, Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 7(1), 2005, pp. 52–53, Appendix A, proof of PROPOSITION 4(i), (A-4)–(A-6)
Human review
Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).
Confirmed by the moderator at approval.