Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Eq. (15) — the augmented functional J_u(n,t,μ) dominates J_u(n,t) for μ ≥ 0

Proved
GVRPricing.FixedPrice.augmented_ge_revenue

by mikedeng1 · Oct 5, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

lagrangian-relaxationp2o-batch-pfp2bp2o-gran-per-chapterp2o-plan-paperp2o-v1revenue-management

Let uuu be an admissible pricing policy, nnn an initial stock, t≥0t\ge0t≥0 a horizon and μ≥0\mu\ge0μ≥0 a multiplier. Then the expected revenue Ju(n,t)J_u(n,t)Ju​(n,t) is finite and

Ju(n,t,μ)=Eu[∫0t(r(λs)−μλs)ds]+nμ ≥ Ju(n,t).(15)J_u(n,t,\mu)=E_u\Big[\int_0^t\big(r(\lambda_s)-\mu\lambda_s\big)ds\Big]+n\mu\ \ge\ J_u(n,t).\qquad(15)Ju​(n,t,μ)=Eu​[∫0t​(r(λs​)−μλs​)ds]+nμ ≥ Ju​(n,t).(15)

The term nμn\munμ prices the stock constraint (13). Combined with Lemma 1, this inequality bounds every policy's revenue by the Lagrangian dual function of the deterministic problem.

Formalization Note Ju(n,t,μ)J_u(n,t,\mu)Ju​(n,t,μ) is the real number Eu[∫0tr(λs)ds]−μEu[∫0tλsds]+nμE_u[\int_0^t r(\lambda_s)ds]-\mu E_u[\int_0^t\lambda_s ds]+n\muEu​[∫0t​r(λs​)ds]−μEu​[∫0t​λs​ds]+nμ; finiteness of the two expectations is asserted in Lemma 1. Here the statement asserts that Ju(n,t)≠∞J_u(n,t)\neq\inftyJu​(n,t)=∞ before comparing real values.

Preamble
import Mathlib
import Definitions.Def_GVRPricing_FixedPrice_Model
import Definitions.Def_GVRPricing_FixedPrice_SalesProcess

open MeasureTheory ProbabilityTheory Set
open scoped ENNReal
Formal statement
namespace GVRPricing.FixedPrice

/-- **Eq. (15)** (§3.2.1, p. 1007): for every admissible policy `u`, stock `n`, horizon `t ≥ 0`
and multiplier `μ ≥ 0`, the expected revenue `J_u(n, t)` is finite and bounded by the augmented
functional `J_u(n, t, μ) = E_u[∫_0^t (r(λ_s) − μ λ_s) ds] + n μ`. -/
theorem augmented_ge_revenue (M : Model) (u : Policy M) (n : ℕ) (t μ : ℝ) (ht : 0 ≤ t)
    (hμ : 0 ≤ μ) :
    u.expectedRevenue n t ≠ ∞ ∧ (u.expectedRevenue n t).toReal ≤ u.augmentedValue n t μ := by sorry

end GVRPricing.FixedPrice
Source
Gallego, van Ryzin, Optimal Dynamic Pricing of Inventories with Stochastic Demand over Finite Horizons, Management Science 40(8) (1994), p. 1007 (PDF 9), §3.2.1, Proof of Theorem 2, eq. (15)
Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Oct 5, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by mikedeng1 · Oct 5, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me