lean_workbook_plus_36611
Disproved⚠️ Retired — specification defect
The Lean statement below does not encode the problem shown on this page, so its
Disprovedstatus carries no information about that problem. Do not import this node or use it as a dependency.
Find all ordered pairs such that and
Why this node was retired
The posted statement is
theorem lean_workbook_plus_36611 (a b : ℝ) (h₁ : a + (a + 8 * b) / (a ^ 2 + b ^ 2) = 2) (h₂ : b + (8 * a - b) / (a ^ 2 + b ^ 2) = 0) : a = 1 ∧ b = -1 / 4 ∨ a = -3 ∧ b = 1 / 4 := by sorry
The inserted two pairs omit the genuine solution(−1,2).
The recorded counterexample refutes the statement as encoded. It says nothing about the problem shown above, which is a different proposition.
Proposed corrected statement
Restore the original find-all/evaluation task without the inserted answer; prove the resulting characterization in both directions. No replacement fixed answer is asserted here. Original task: Find all ordered pairs such that and
Diagnosis and correction from the public Prove2Me statement audit (wamlat/prove2me-errors). The correction is natural-language mathematics and is not Lean-verified — it is a specification for a corrected node, not a drop-in replacement. No corrected replacement node exists yet.
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.Basic
theorem lean_workbook_plus_36611 (a b : ℝ) (h₁ : a + (a + 8 * b) / (a ^ 2 + b ^ 2) = 2) (h₂ : b + (8 * a - b) / (a ^ 2 + b ^ 2) = 0) : a = 1 ∧ b = -1 / 4 ∨ a = -3 ∧ b = 1 / 4 := by sorry