Edge count is monotone under graph inclusion
ProvedWilliamsonShmoys.subgraph_edge_count_monotone__p2m_c5eab97f_571a_4af4_85c9_353e33d2f94f_a1approximation-algorithmsplanar-graphstreewidth
For finite simple graphs on the same vertex type, subgraph inclusion implies that the edge-set cardinality cannot decrease. This follows by inclusion of the finite edge sets and cardinality monotonicity.
Preamble
import Mathlib set_option autoImplicit false
Formal statement
theorem WilliamsonShmoys.subgraph_edge_count_monotone__p2m_c5eab97f_571a_4af4_85c9_353e33d2f94f_a1
{V : Type} [Fintype V]
(H K : SimpleGraph V)
(hHK : H ≤ K) :
H.edgeSet.ncard ≤ K.edgeSet.ncard := by
sorrySource
David P. Williamson and David B. Shmoys, The Design of Approximation Algorithms, Cambridge University Press, 2011, author electronic manuscript, Section 10.2, proof of Theorem 10.11, pp. 270-272. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511921735. Bounded tree-width of the pieces: Robertson–Seymour (planar graphs of radius r have tree-width at most 3r+1) / Bodlaender (k-outerplanar graphs have tree-width at most 3k-1).