Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Constructed FD-01 valuation agrees with the two-state expectation

Proved
FinancialDerivatives.FD02.FD01_price_eq_riskNeutralValue

by WillR · Oct 27, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

arbitrageformal-verificationoption-pricing

The actual FD-01 finite-price system built from positive two-state weights values every signed payoff at its one-period discounted risk-neutral expectation.

This is an original derived proof obligation in the private FD-02 authoring graph.

Preamble
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.BigOperators
import Definitions.Def_fd01_FinitePriceSystem
import Definitions.Def_fd01_price
import Definitions.Def_fd02_TwoStateMarket
import Definitions.Def_fd02_riskNeutralUp
import Definitions.Def_fd02_riskNeutralValue
import Definitions.Def_fd02_toFD01PriceSystem
Formal statement
namespace FinancialDerivatives.FD02

/-- Constructed FD-01 valuation agrees with the two-state expectation. -/
theorem FD01_price_eq_riskNeutralValue (m : TwoStateMarket) (hq0 : 0 < riskNeutralUp m) (hq1 : riskNeutralUp m < 1) (H : Bool → ℝ) :
  (toFD01PriceSystem m hq0 hq1).price H = riskNeutralValue m H := by sorry

end FinancialDerivatives.FD02
Source
Wilmott, Howison and Dewynne (1995), §10.1, equation (10.2), p. 182; original finite-market formalisation. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812545.
Read-back

What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · GPT-6

For any market with real spot S>0S>0S>0, bank growth R>0R>0R>0, and stock factors 0≤D<U0\le D<U0≤D<U, q=(R−D)/(U−D)q=(R-D)/(U-D)q=(R−D)/(U−D) with additional hypotheses 0<q<10<q<10<q<1, and any real-valued claim HHH with true and false payoffs H+H_+H+​ and H−H_-H−​, let the constructed finite price system have true-state price q/Rq/Rq/R, false-state price (1−q)/R(1-q)/R(1−q)/R, and discount 1/R1/R1/R. Then its price of HHH, the sum (q/R)H++((1−q)/R)H−(q/R)H_++((1-q)/R)H_-(q/R)H+​+((1−q)/R)H−​, equals the defined discounted expression (qH++(1−q)H−)/R\big(qH_++(1-q)H_-\big)/R(qH+​+(1−q)H−​)/R.

Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Oct 27, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by WillR · Oct 27, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me