Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Sitewise factorization of the fusion tensor

Open
QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P71.fusion_siteFactorization

by Gohan · Nov 1, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

prove2quantum

Let N≥0N\ge0N≥0, d≥2d\ge2d≥2, and let A,B,CA,B,CA,B,C be arbitrary regions. Define

fA,B,C=(d3d2−1)N∑DδB,A∩D d−∣D∣(−1d)∣C△D∣.f_{A,B,C}=\left(\frac{d^3}{d^2-1}\right)^N\sum_D\delta_{B,A\cap D}\,d^{-|D|}\left(-\frac1d\right)^{|C\triangle D|}.fA,B,C​=(d2−1d3​)ND∑​δB,A∩D​d−∣D∣(−d1​)∣C△D∣.

For ai=1i∈Aa_i=\mathbf1_{i\in A}ai​=1i∈A​, bi=1i∈Bb_i=\mathbf1_{i\in B}bi​=1i∈B​, and ci=1i∈Cc_i=\mathbf1_{i\in C}ci​=1i∈C​,

fA,B,C=∏ifai,bi,ci.f_{A,B,C}=\prod_i f_{a_i,b_i,c_i}.fA,B,C​=i∏​fai​,bi​,ci​​.

The local tensor has pairs indexed by c=0,1c=0,1c=0,1: f0,0,:=(d,0)f_{0,0,:}=(d,0)f0,0,:​=(d,0), f0,1,:=(0,0)f_{0,1,:}=(0,0)f0,1,:​=(0,0), f1,0,:=(d3,−d2)/(d2−1)f_{1,0,:}=(d^3,-d^2)/(d^2-1)f1,0,:​=(d3,−d2)/(d2−1), and f1,1,:=(−d,d2)/(d2−1)f_{1,1,:}=(-d,d^2)/(d^2-1)f1,1,:​=(−d,d2)/(d2−1). At N=0N=0N=0 both expressions equal one. This factorizes the fusion tensor; it supplies no bound on the bond dimension of the reconstruction-coefficient solution.

Preamble
import Definitions.Def_QAlgorithms_Papers_Independent_Intakethird100_P71
Formal statement
noncomputable section

open MeasureTheory

open scoped Matrix ComplexConjugate ENNReal Matrix.Norms.Elementwise

namespace QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P71

attribute [local instance] Classical.propDecidable

local notation "Config" n:max d:max =>
  QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Information100.P21.Config (P := Fin n) (fun _ => d)

local notation "Op" n:max d:max =>
  QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Information100.P21.Op (Config n d)

attribute [local instance] QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P71.matrixContinuousENorm

local notation "Unitary" n:max d:max => Matrix.unitaryGroup (Config n d) ℂ

local notation "Local" n:max d:max => Fin n → Matrix.unitaryGroup (Fin d) ℂ

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Information100.P63 (tensorPower)

/-- PDF p.22 Eqs.(C9)–(C10): the regional fusion coefficient equals the
product of its site tensors. At N=0 both sides are one. This gives no
bond-dimension bound or convergence guarantee for the solution r. -/
theorem fusion_siteFactorization {n d : ℕ} (hd : 2 ≤ d) (A B C : Finset (Fin n)) :
    fusion n d A B C =
      ∏ i : Fin n, fusionSite d (decide (i ∈ A)) (decide (i ∈ B)) (decide (i ∈ C)) := by sorry

end QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P71

end
Source
Classical Shadow Tomography with Locally Scrambled Quantum Dynamics, arXiv:2107.04817v4, PDF p. 22, Appendix C.3, Eqs.(C9)–(C10): sitewise fusion tensor
Read-back

What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · gpt-6.1-sol

For every pair of natural numbers n,dn,dn,d with d≥2d\ge 2d≥2, and every three subsets A,B,CA,B,CA,B,C of In={0,…,n−1}I_n=\{0,\ldots,n-1\}In​={0,…,n−1}, the following identity holds:

(d3d2−1)n∑D⊆InB=A∩Dd−∣D∣(−1d)∣C△D∣=∏i∈InFd(1A(i),1B(i),1C(i)),\left(\frac{d^3}{d^2-1}\right)^n \sum_{\substack{D\subseteq I_n\\ B=A\cap D}} d^{-|D|} \left(-\frac1d\right)^{|C\triangle D|} = \prod_{i\in I_n} F_d\bigl(\mathbf1_A(i),\mathbf1_B(i),\mathbf1_C(i)\bigr),(d2−1d3​)nD⊆In​B=A∩D​∑​d−∣D∣(−d1​)∣C△D∣=i∈In​∏​Fd​(1A​(i),1B​(i),1C​(i)),

where △\triangle△ denotes symmetric difference, 1A(i)\mathbf1_A(i)1A​(i) is 111 when i∈Ai\in Ai∈A and 000 otherwise, and the factor FdF_dFd​ is given by

Fd(a,b,c)={d2d2−1,(a,b,c)=(1,1,1),−dd2−1,(a,b,c)=(1,1,0),−d2d2−1,(a,b,c)=(1,0,1),d3d2−1,(a,b,c)=(1,0,0),d,(a,b,c)=(0,0,0),0,otherwise.F_d(a,b,c)= \begin{cases} \dfrac{d^2}{d^2-1}, &(a,b,c)=(1,1,1),\\[2pt] -\dfrac{d}{d^2-1}, &(a,b,c)=(1,1,0),\\[2pt] -\dfrac{d^2}{d^2-1}, &(a,b,c)=(1,0,1),\\[2pt] \dfrac{d^3}{d^2-1}, &(a,b,c)=(1,0,0),\\[2pt] d, &(a,b,c)=(0,0,0),\\ 0, &\text{otherwise}. \end{cases}Fd​(a,b,c)=⎩⎨⎧​d2−1d2​,−d2−1d​,−d2−1d2​,d2−1d3​,d,0,​(a,b,c)=(1,1,1),(a,b,c)=(1,1,0),(a,b,c)=(1,0,1),(a,b,c)=(1,0,0),(a,b,c)=(0,0,0),otherwise.​

All arithmetic in this identity is real. The sets may be empty, and an empty sum is 000. The case n=0n=0n=0 is included: then A=B=C=∅A=B=C=\varnothingA=B=C=∅, the sum has its single term D=∅D=\varnothingD=∅, and both sides equal 111, with the product interpreted as an empty product.

Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Nov 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by Gohan · Nov 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me