Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Successive differences vanish when a cluster point exists

Proved
NonconvexSplitting.ProxGrad.succ_diff_tendsto_zero

by mikedeng1 · Sep 29, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

nonconvex-optimizationp2o-batch-p200bp2o-gran-per-chapterp2o-plan-paperp2o-v1proximal-gradient

Assume the hypotheses of Theorem 4: the standing assumptions on hhh and PPP; qqq twice continuously differentiable and convex; ℓ>0\ell > 0ℓ>0 with −ℓI⪯∇2h(x)+∇2q(x)⪯ℓI-\ell I \preceq \nabla^2 h(x) + \nabla^2 q(x) \preceq \ell I−ℓI⪯∇2h(x)+∇2q(x)⪯ℓI for all xxx; step size β∈(0,1/ℓ)\beta \in (0, 1/\ell)β∈(0,1/ℓ); and (xt)(x^t)(xt) generated by the proximal gradient update (43). If (xt)(x^t)(xt) has a cluster point, then

lim⁡t→∞∥xt+1−xt∥=0.\lim_{t \to \infty} \|x^{t+1} - x^t\| = 0 .t→∞lim​∥xt+1−xt∥=0.

This is the step that lets the iterate xti+1x^{t_i+1}xti​+1 inherit the limit of a convergent subsequence xtix^{t_i}xti​.

Formalization Note A cluster point is a limit of xφ(i)x^{\varphi(i)}xφ(i) for some strictly increasing φ:N→N\varphi : \mathbb{N} \to \mathbb{N}φ:N→N. No finiteness of P(x0)P(x^0)P(x0) is assumed.

Preamble
import Mathlib
import Definitions.Def_NonconvexSplitting_ProxGrad_StandingAssumptions
import Definitions.Def_NonconvexSplitting_ProxGrad_HessianSandwich
import Definitions.Def_NonconvexSplitting_ProxGrad_IsProxGradSeq

open Filter Topology
Formal statement
namespace NonconvexSplitting.ProxGrad

/-- Li–Pong (p. 19): under the hypotheses of Theorem 4, if `{x^t}` has a cluster point then
`‖x^{t+1} - x^t‖ → 0`. -/
theorem succ_diff_tendsto_zero {n : ℕ} (h q : EuclideanSpace ℝ (Fin n) → ℝ) (P : EuclideanSpace ℝ (Fin n) → EReal) (ℓ β : ℝ)
    (x : ℕ → EuclideanSpace ℝ (Fin n))
    (hSA : StandingAssumptions h P) (hq : ContDiff ℝ 2 q) (hq_convex : ConvexOn ℝ Set.univ q)
    (hℓ : 0 < ℓ) (h44 : HessianSandwich h q ℓ) (hβ : 0 < β)
    (hβℓ : β < 1 / ℓ) (hx : IsProxGradSeq h P β x)
    (hclu : ∃ xs : EuclideanSpace ℝ (Fin n), ∃ φ : ℕ → ℕ,
      StrictMono φ ∧ Tendsto (x ∘ φ) atTop (𝓝 xs)) :
    Tendsto (fun t => ‖x (t + 1) - x t‖) atTop (𝓝 0) := by sorry

end NonconvexSplitting.ProxGrad
Source
Li & Pong, Global Convergence of Splitting Methods for Nonconvex Composite Optimization, arXiv:1407.0753v6, p. 19, first paragraph of the page
Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Oct 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by mikedeng1 · Oct 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me