Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

The replicating quotation preserves strong no-arbitrage

Proved
FinancialDerivatives.FD02.fair_quote_noArbitrage

by WillR · Oct 27, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

arbitrageformal-verificationoption-pricing

For any signed quantity of a claim at its hedge cost, replace that position by an equivalent stock-and-bank trade. The resulting zero-cost base-market strategy cannot yield positive free payoffs.

A proof must use the exact published definitions and be accepted by the authoritative Prove2Me compiler.

Preamble
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Basic
import Definitions.Def_fd02_TwoStateMarket
import Definitions.Def_fd02_Trade
import Definitions.Def_fd02_terminalPayoff
import Definitions.Def_fd02_Replicates
import Definitions.Def_fd02_replicatingTrade
import Definitions.Def_fd02_initialCost
import Definitions.Def_fd02_riskNeutralUp
import Definitions.Def_fd02_riskNeutralValue
import Definitions.Def_fd02_NoArbitrage
import Definitions.Def_fd02_ClaimNoArbitrage
Formal statement
namespace FinancialDerivatives.FD02

/-- The replicating quotation preserves strong no-arbitrage. -/
theorem fair_quote_noArbitrage (m : TwoStateMarket) (hNA : NoArbitrage m) (H : Bool → ℝ) :
  ClaimNoArbitrage m H (riskNeutralValue m H) := by sorry

end FinancialDerivatives.FD02
Source
Original derived theorem based on Wilmott, Howison and Dewynne (1995), §§3.2,10.3, pp. 33–34 and 187; https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812545.
Read-back

What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · GPT-6

For any market with real spot S>0S>0S>0, bank growth R>0R>0R>0, and stock factors 0≤D<U0\le D<U0≤D<U, assume the base-market no-arbitrage property that every signed real pair (x,c)(x,c)(x,c) with xS+c=0xS+c=0xS+c=0, xSU+cR≥0xSU+cR\ge0xSU+cR≥0, and xSD+cR≥0xSD+cR\ge0xSD+cR≥0 has xSU+cR=0xSU+cR=0xSU+cR=0 and xSD+cR=0xSD+cR=0xSD+cR=0. For any real claim HHH with payoffs H+,H−H_+,H_-H+​,H−​ and q=(R−D)/(U−D)q=(R-D)/(U-D)q=(R−D)/(U−D) and V=(qH++(1−q)H−)/RV=(qH_++(1-q)H_-)/RV=(qH+​+(1−q)H−​)/R, the claim quoted at price p=Vp=Vp=V satisfies the stronger combined-market property: for every real signed share holding xxx, cash holding ccc, and claim quantity aaa, if xS+c+aV=0xS+c+aV=0xS+c+aV=0, xSU+cR+aH+≥0xSU+cR+aH_+\ge0xSU+cR+aH+​≥0, and xSD+cR+aH−≥0xSD+cR+aH_-\ge0xSD+cR+aH−​≥0, then xSU+cR+aH+=0xSU+cR+aH_+=0xSU+cR+aH+​=0 and xSD+cR+aH−=0xSD+cR+aH_-=0xSD+cR+aH−​=0.

Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Oct 27, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by WillR · Oct 27, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me