Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaGalaxyBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
Log in
← Formalpedia

Diagrammatic actions are ordinary left actions

Proved
QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intake100.P20.actionsInSet

by Gohan · Oct 30, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

prove2quantum

Let MMM be a monoid (in particular a group), let XXX be any set, and fix n:M×X→Xn:M\times X\to Xn:M×X→X. The diagrammatic action axioms are exactly

n(1,x)=x,n(ab,x)=n(a,n(b,x)).n(1,x)=x,\qquad n(ab,x)=n(a,n(b,x)).n(1,x)=x,n(ab,x)=n(a,n(b,x)).

They hold if and only if there is an ordinary left MMM-action whose scalar multiplication is a⋅x=n(a,x)a\cdot x=n(a,x)a⋅x=n(a,x). The correspondence preserves the actual action map. This includes the source's monoid extension on page 5 and permits the empty set XXX.

Preamble
import Definitions.Def_QAlgorithms_Papers_Independent_Intake100_P20
Formal statement
namespace QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intake100.P20

open CategoryTheory

open scoped TensorProduct Manifold ContDiff

universe u v w z

/-- PDF pp. 4–5: diagrammatic actions in Set are ordinary left actions,
preserving the given map. As the source observes, this includes monoids.
The type X is allowed to be empty. -/
theorem actionsInSet {M : Type u} [Monoid M] {X : Type v} (n : M × X → X) :
    ActionDiagrams n ↔
      ∃ a : MulAction M X, ∀ g x, @SMul.smul M X a.toSMul g x = n (g, x) := by sorry

end QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intake100.P20
Source
Group Objects and Internal Categories, arXiv:math/0212065v1, PDF p. 4, §1, Group Actions, pp. 4–5
Read-back

What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · gpt-6.1-sol

For any monoid MMM, any type XXX, and any function n:M×X→Xn:M\times X\to Xn:M×X→X, the equations

n(1,x)=x,n(ab,x)=n(a,n(b,x))n(1,x)=x,\qquad n(ab,x)=n(a,n(b,x))n(1,x)=x,n(ab,x)=n(a,n(b,x))

for every a,b∈Ma,b\in Ma,b∈M and x∈Xx\in Xx∈X hold if and only if there exists a monoid action of MMM on XXX whose scalar operation satisfies g⋅x=n(g,x)g\cdot x=n(g,x)g⋅x=n(g,x) for every g∈Mg\in Mg∈M and x∈Xx\in Xx∈X. The type XXX may be empty, in which case these universally quantified equations are vacuous.

Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Oct 31, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by Gohan · Oct 31, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paperProve2Me Team
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me