Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Eq. (4.6) — the residuals of Algorithm 3.1 tend to zero

Proved
AndersonAccel.Safe.residual_tendsto_zero

by mikedeng1 · Sep 27, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

anderson-accelerationfixed-point-iterationp2o-batch-p200ap2o-gran-per-chapterp2o-plan-paperp2o-v1residual

Let f:Rn→Rnf:\mathbb R^n\to\mathbb R^nf:Rn→Rn be nonexpansive with a nonempty fixed-point set, and run Algorithm 3.1 with θˉ,τ,α∈(0,1)\bar\theta,\tau,\alpha\in(0,1)θˉ,τ,α∈(0,1), D,ϵ>0D,\epsilon>0D,ϵ>0 and max-memory m≥1m\ge1m≥1, assuming no iterate is a solution (f(xk)≠xkf(x^k)\ne x^kf(xk)=xk for all kkk). Then the residuals gk=xk−f(xk)g_k=x^k-f(x^k)gk​=xk−f(xk) satisfy

lim⁡k→∞∥gk∥2=0.\lim_{k\to\infty}\|g_k\|_2=0.k→∞lim​∥gk​∥2​=0.

This is Step 1 of the global convergence proof: both the averaged steps and the accepted accelerated steps drive the residual to zero.

Formalization Note The hypothesis f(xk)≠xkf(x^k)\ne x^kf(xk)=xk is the paper's standing simplification at the start of §4.1.

Preamble
import Mathlib
import Definitions.Def_AndersonAccel_Safe_Basic
import Definitions.Def_AndersonAccel_Safe_IsAAISRun
Formal statement
namespace AndersonAccel.Safe

open Filter Topology

/-- Eq. (4.6) (p. 3181). The residuals of the iterates of Algorithm 3.1 tend to zero:
`lim_{k → ∞} ‖g_k‖ = 0`. -/
theorem residual_tendsto_zero {n : ℕ} (f : EuclideanSpace ℝ (Fin n) → EuclideanSpace ℝ (Fin n)) (hf : LipschitzWith 1 f)
    (θbar τ α D ε : ℝ) (m : ℕ)
    (hθ0 : 0 < θbar) (hθ1 : θbar < 1) (hτ0 : 0 < τ) (hτ1 : τ < 1) (hα0 : 0 < α) (hα1 : α < 1)
    (hD : 0 < D) (hε : 0 < ε) (hm : 0 < m)
    (x xt s y shat ytil : ℕ → EuclideanSpace ℝ (Fin n))
    (H : ℕ → (EuclideanSpace ℝ (Fin n) →L[ℝ] EuclideanSpace ℝ (Fin n))) (mem nAA : ℕ → ℕ)
    (hrun : IsAAISRun f θbar τ α D ε m x xt s y shat ytil H mem nAA)
    (hX : ∃ z, f z = z)
    (hnosol : ∀ k, f (x k) ≠ x k) :
    Tendsto (fun k => ‖residual f (x k)‖) atTop (𝓝 0) := by sorry

end AndersonAccel.Safe
Source
Zhang, O'Donoghue, Boyd, SIAM J. Optim. 30 (2020), p. 3181, Section 4.1, Step 1, Eq. (4.6)
Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Oct 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by mikedeng1 · Oct 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me