lean_workbook_plus_359

⚠️ Retired — specification defect

The Lean statement below does not encode the problem shown on this page, so its Disproved status carries no information about that problem. Do not import this node or use it as a dependency.

Maybe written as $2^{3x} + 2^x \cdot 3^x - 3 ^{3(x-1)} = 1$

Why this node was retired

The posted statement is

theorem lean_workbook_plus_359 : ∀ x : ℕ, (2^(3*x) + 2^x * 3^x - 3^(3*(x-1)) = 1)   :=  by sorry

The source fragment only presents an equivalent equation.

The recorded counterexample refutes the statement as encoded. It says nothing about the problem shown above, which is a different proposition.

Proposed corrected statement

Restore the original equation-solving or rewriting task and its domain; do not universally assert the displayed equation. Use integer subtraction or real exponents if x−1 can be negative.

Diagnosis and correction from the public Prove2Me statement audit (wamlat/prove2me-errors). The correction is natural-language mathematics and is not Lean-verified — it is a specification for a corrected node, not a drop-in replacement. No corrected replacement node exists yet.