Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaGalaxyBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
Log in
← Formalpedia

A trajectory accumulating on PPP meets every fast plane over PPP at arbitrarily large times

Open
FiniteEnergyPlane.exists_hit_of_tendsto_orbit

by Mazecto · Nov 4, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

fast-planesglobal-surfaces-of-sectionopen-book-decompositionspseudoholomorphic-curvesreeb-dynamicssymplectic-geometrysymplectization

Let S=H−1(1)⊂R4S=H^{-1}(1)\subset\mathbb{R}^4S=H−1(1)⊂R4 be a strictly star-shaped level, JJJ a smooth dλ0d\lambda_0dλ0​-compatible complex structure on ξ\xiξ, and P=(x,TP)P=(x,T_P)P=(x,TP​) a periodic Reeb orbit with μCZ(P)≥3\mu_{CZ}(P)\ge3μCZ​(P)≥3 (PPP may be degenerate unless stated otherwise). Let uuu be a fast finite-energy plane asymptotic to PPP at ∞\infty∞, and let yyy be a Reeb trajectory with y(0)∉x(R)y(0)\notin x(\mathbb{R})y(0)∈/x(R).

  1. If y(sk)y(s_k)y(sk​) converges to a point of x(R)x(\mathbb{R})x(R) for some sk→+∞s_k\to+\inftysk​→+∞, then for every n∈Rn\in\mathbb{R}n∈R there is t>nt>nt>n with y(t)∈proj(u(C))y(t)\in\mathrm{proj}(u(\mathbb{C}))y(t)∈proj(u(C)).
  2. If y(sk)y(s_k)y(sk​) converges to a point of x(R)x(\mathbb{R})x(R) for some sk→−∞s_k\to-\inftysk​→−∞, then for every n∈Rn\in\mathbb{R}n∈R there is t<nt<nt<n with y(t)∈proj(u(C))y(t)\in\mathrm{proj}(u(\mathbb{C}))y(t)∈proj(u(C)).

Formalization Note The hypotheses of 1 and 2 say that the ω\omegaω-limit set, respectively the α\alphaα-limit set, of y(0)y(0)y(0) meets x(R)x(\mathbb{R})x(R). μCZ(P)≥3\mu_{CZ}(P)\ge3μCZ​(P)≥3 is P.IsCZAtLeast 3, the index of the linearized flow along PPP in the global frame of ξ\xiξ. Hryniewicz writes μ(u~)=k≥3\mu(\tilde u)=k\ge3μ(u~)=k≥3 and restricts to Λk\Lambda_kΛk​; on a strictly star-shaped level ξ\xiξ has a global frame, which extends over every capping disk, so the index depends only on PPP, Λk=Λ\Lambda_k=\LambdaΛk​=Λ, and the condition is not restated. The plane uuu is not assumed to be embedded.

Preamble
import Definitions.Def_FiniteEnergyPlane_OpenBook
Formal statement
namespace FiniteEnergyPlane

open MeasureTheory Metric Filter Topology
open scoped ContDiff ENNReal Real

/-- Hryniewicz (Trans. AMS 2012), Lemma 6.9; Hofer–Wysocki–Zehnder (Ann. of Math. 1998), § 5. Let `u`
be a fast finite-energy plane asymptotic to `P` at `∞`, where the Conley–Zehnder index of `P` is at
least `3`, and let `y` be a Reeb trajectory with `y 0 ∉ x(ℝ)`. If a point of `x(ℝ)` is a limit of
`y(tₖ)` for some `tₖ → +∞` (that is, the `ω`-limit set of `y 0` meets `x(ℝ)`), then `y` meets
`proj H ∘ u` at times larger than any given `n`. The same holds for `tₖ → -∞` (the `α`-limit set)
and times smaller than any given `n`. -/
theorem exists_hit_of_tendsto_orbit (H : V 1 → ℝ) (hH : IsStrictlyStarShapedLevel H)
    (J : V 1 → V 1 →L[ℝ] V 1) (hJ : IsCompatibleXiStructure H J)
    (P : ReebOrbit H) (hcz : P.IsCZAtLeast 3) (u : ℂ → V 1) (hu : IsFastPlane H J u)
    (huP : IsNondegenerateEnd H u cylInf P 1) (y : ℝ → V 1) (hy : IsReebTrajectory H y)
    (hy₀ : y 0 ∉ Set.range P.x) :
    ((∃ (τ₀ : ℝ) (s : ℕ → ℝ), Tendsto s atTop atTop ∧ Tendsto (y ∘ s) atTop (𝓝 (P.x τ₀))) →
      ∀ n : ℝ, ∃ t > n, y t ∈ Set.range (fun z => proj H (u z))) ∧
    ((∃ (τ₀ : ℝ) (s : ℕ → ℝ), Tendsto s atTop atBot ∧ Tendsto (y ∘ s) atTop (𝓝 (P.x τ₀))) →
      ∀ n : ℝ, ∃ t < n, y t ∈ Set.range (fun z => proj H (u z))) := by
  sorry

end FiniteEnergyPlane
Source
U. Hryniewicz, Fast finite-energy planes in symplectizations and applications, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 364 (2012), 1859–1931, arXiv:0812.4076, Lemma 6.9; H. Hofer, K. Wysocki, E. Zehnder, The dynamics on three-dimensional strictly convex energy surfaces, Ann. of Math. 148 (1998), 197–289, Section 5
Read-back

What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · claude-opus-5-5

FiniteEnergyPlane.exists_hit_of_tendsto_orbit

Let H:R4→RH:\mathbb{R}^4\to\mathbb{R}H:R4→R have strictly star-shaped level {H=1}\{H=1\}{H=1}, let JJJ be a compatible ξ\xiξ-structure for HHH, let PPP be a Reeb orbit of HHH with "CZ index of PPP at least 333", let u:C→R4u:\mathbb{C}\to\mathbb{R}^4u:C→R4 be a fast plane having end on PPP (with sign +1+1+1), and let y:R→R4y:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}^4y:R→R4 be a Reeb trajectory with y(0)∉im Py(0)\notin\mathrm{im}\,Py(0)∈/imP.

Then both of the following implications hold, where im(prH∘u)={prH(u(z)):z∈C}\mathrm{im}(\mathrm{pr}_H\circ u)=\{\mathrm{pr}_H(u(z)):z\in\mathbb{C}\}im(prH​∘u)={prH​(u(z)):z∈C}:

  1. Forward. If there exist τ0∈R\tau_0\in\mathbb{R}τ0​∈R and a real sequence sk→+∞s_k\to+\inftysk​→+∞ with y(sk)→xP(τ0)y(s_k)\to x_P(\tau_0)y(sk​)→xP​(τ0​), then for every n∈Rn\in\mathbb{R}n∈R there is t>nt>nt>n with y(t)∈im(prH∘u)y(t)\in\mathrm{im}(\mathrm{pr}_H\circ u)y(t)∈im(prH​∘u).
  2. Backward. If there exist τ0∈R\tau_0\in\mathbb{R}τ0​∈R and a real sequence sk→−∞s_k\to-\inftysk​→−∞ with y(sk)→xP(τ0)y(s_k)\to x_P(\tau_0)y(sk​)→xP​(τ0​), then for every n∈Rn\in\mathbb{R}n∈R there is t<nt<nt<n with y(t)∈im(prH∘u)y(t)\in\mathrm{im}(\mathrm{pr}_H\circ u)y(t)∈im(prH​∘u).

uuu is not assumed embedded, and no base point or energy value of uuu is prescribed. No nondegeneracy of any orbit and no compactness hypothesis is assumed. The sequence sks_ksk​ need not be monotone. The conclusion only concerns membership of y(t)y(t)y(t) in the image; no statement about transversality or the number of hits is made.

Background notions

Conventions. Vn=R2(n+1)V_n=\mathbb{R}^{2(n+1)}Vn​=R2(n+1) with coordinates v0,…,v2n+1v_0,\dots,v_{2n+1}v0​,…,v2n+1​; below mostly n=1n=1n=1, so V1=R4V_1=\mathbb{R}^4V1​=R4. Df(p)Df(p)Df(p) denotes the real Fréchet derivative, which is the zero map by convention where fff is not differentiable. For fff on C\mathbb{C}C: ∂sf(z)=Df(z)[1]\partial_sf(z)=Df(z)[1]∂s​f(z)=Df(z)[1], ∂tf(z)=Df(z)[i]\partial_tf(z)=Df(z)[i]∂t​f(z)=Df(z)[i]. Also 0−1=00^{-1}=00−1=0, and im P\mathrm{im}\,PimP is the image of xP:R→Vnx_P:\mathbb{R}\to V_nxP​:R→Vn​.

Symplectic data on VnV_nVn​. (j0v)k=−vk+1(j_0v)_k=-v_{k+1}(j0​v)k​=−vk+1​ for kkk even, (j0v)k=vk−1(j_0v)_k=v_{k-1}(j0​v)k​=vk−1​ for kkk odd. ω0(u,v)=∑k(j0u)kvk=∑i(u2iv2i+1−u2i+1v2i)\omega_0(u,v)=\sum_k(j_0u)_kv_k=\sum_i(u_{2i}v_{2i+1}-u_{2i+1}v_{2i})ω0​(u,v)=∑k​(j0​u)k​vk​=∑i​(u2i​v2i+1​−u2i+1​v2i​). λx(v)=12ω0(x,v)\lambda_x(v)=\tfrac12\omega_0(x,v)λx​(v)=21​ω0​(x,v). ∇H(x)\nabla H(x)∇H(x) has components DH(x)[ek]DH(x)[e_k]DH(x)[ek​]; XH(x)=j0∇H(x)X_H(x)=j_0\nabla H(x)XH​(x)=j0​∇H(x).

Reeb field. RH(x)=λx(XH(x))−1 XH(x)R_H(x)=\lambda_x(X_H(x))^{-1}\,X_H(x)RH​(x)=λx​(XH​(x))−1XH​(x) (the zero vector where λx(XH(x))=0\lambda_x(X_H(x))=0λx​(XH​(x))=0). ξ\xiξ-membership: "v∈ξxv\in\xi_xv∈ξx​" means λx(v)=0\lambda_x(v)=0λx​(v)=0 and DH(x)[v]=0DH(x)[v]=0DH(x)[v]=0.

Strictly star-shaped level. H∈C∞(Vn)H\in C^\infty(V_n)H∈C∞(Vn​); for every u≠0u\ne0u=0 there is exactly one r>0r>0r>0 with H(ru)=1H(ru)=1H(ru)=1; and DH(x)[x]>0DH(x)[x]>0DH(x)[x]>0 whenever H(x)=1H(x)=1H(x)=1. The last clause forces H(0)≠1H(0)\ne1H(0)=1.

Compatible ξ\xiξ-structure. J:Vn→L(Vn,Vn)J:V_n\to\mathcal{L}(V_n,V_n)J:Vn​→L(Vn​,Vn​) is C∞C^\inftyC∞ on all of VnV_nVn​, and for all xxx with H(x)=1H(x)=1H(x)=1 and all v,w∈ξxv,w\in\xi_xv,w∈ξx​: Jxv∈ξxJ_xv\in\xi_xJx​v∈ξx​; JxJxv=−vJ_xJ_xv=-vJx​Jx​v=−v; if v≠0v\ne0v=0 then ω0(v,Jxv)>0\omega_0(v,J_xv)>0ω0​(v,Jx​v)>0; ω0(Jxv,Jxw)=ω0(v,w)\omega_0(J_xv,J_xw)=\omega_0(v,w)ω0​(Jx​v,Jx​w)=ω0​(v,w).

Radial coordinates. σH(y)\sigma_H(y)σH​(y) is a chosen r>0r>0r>0 with H(ry)=1H(ry)=1H(ry)=1 if one exists, and 111 otherwise. prH(y)=σH(y) y\mathrm{pr}_H(y)=\sigma_H(y)\,yprH​(y)=σH​(y)y and aH(y)=−12log⁡σH(y)a_H(y)=-\tfrac12\log\sigma_H(y)aH​(y)=−21​logσH​(y). (For star-shaped HHH: at y≠0y\ne0y=0 the rrr is unique; at y=0y=0y=0 the value is σH(0)=1\sigma_H(0)=1σH​(0)=1.)

Almost complex structure on VnV_nVn​. For y∈Vny\in V_ny∈Vn​ with x=prH(y)x=\mathrm{pr}_H(y)x=prH​(y), r=σH(y)r=\sigma_H(y)r=σH​(y), set α=r2DH(x)[x]DH(x)\alpha=\frac{r}{2DH(x)[x]}DH(x)α=2DH(x)[x]r​DH(x), β=rλx\beta=r\lambda_xβ=rλx​, and w(h)=h−α(h) 2y−β(h) r−1RH(x)w(h)=h-\alpha(h)\,2y-\beta(h)\,r^{-1}R_H(x)w(h)=h−α(h)2y−β(h)r−1RH​(x). Then

J~y(h)=α(h) r−1RH(x)−β(h) 2y+Jx(w(h)).\tilde J_y(h)=\alpha(h)\,r^{-1}R_H(x)-\beta(h)\,2y+J_x(w(h)).J~y​(h)=α(h)r−1RH​(x)−β(h)2y+Jx​(w(h)).

Finite energy curve on C\mathbb{C}C (only C\mathbb{C}C itself is used here). u:C→Vnu:\mathbb{C}\to V_nu:C→Vn​ with: u∈C∞u\in C^\inftyu∈C∞; u(z)≠0u(z)\ne0u(z)=0 for all zzz; uuu is differentiable at each zzz with ∂su(z)+J~u(z)∂tu(z)=0\partial_su(z)+\tilde J_{u(z)}\partial_tu(z)=0∂s​u(z)+J~u(z)​∂t​u(z)=0; and E(u)<∞E(u)<\inftyE(u)<∞, where

E(u)=sup⁡φ∫C[φ′(a)(∂sa λw(∂tw)−∂ta λw(∂sw))+φ(a) ω0(∂sw,∂tw)]+ dA,E(u)=\sup_\varphi\int_{\mathbb{C}}\big[\varphi'(a)\big(\partial_sa\,\lambda_w(\partial_tw)-\partial_ta\,\lambda_w(\partial_sw)\big)+\varphi(a)\,\omega_0(\partial_sw,\partial_tw)\big]^+\,dA,E(u)=φsup​∫C​[φ′(a)(∂s​aλw​(∂t​w)−∂t​aλw​(∂s​w))+φ(a)ω0​(∂s​w,∂t​w)]+dA,

with a=aH∘ua=a_H\circ ua=aH​∘u, w=prH∘uw=\mathrm{pr}_H\circ uw=prH​∘u, the supremum over C∞C^\inftyC∞ monotone (non-decreasing) φ:R→[0,1]\varphi:\mathbb{R}\to[0,1]φ:R→[0,1], and [⋅]+[\cdot]^+[⋅]+ the positive part (the integral is a [0,∞][0,\infty][0,∞]-valued Lebesgue integral).

dλd\lambdadλ-energy. For Ω⊆C\Omega\subseteq\mathbb{C}Ω⊆C: Edλ(Ω,u)=∫Ω[ω0(∂sw,∂tw)]+ dA∈[0,∞]E_{d\lambda}(\Omega,u)=\int_\Omega[\omega_0(\partial_sw,\partial_tw)]^+\,dA\in[0,\infty]Edλ​(Ω,u)=∫Ω​[ω0​(∂s​w,∂t​w)]+dA∈[0,∞], with w=prH∘uw=\mathrm{pr}_H\circ uw=prH​∘u.

Reeb orbit. A Reeb orbit PPP of HHH is a pair (xP,TP)(x_P,T_P)(xP​,TP​) with xP:R→Vnx_P:\mathbb{R}\to V_nxP​:R→Vn​, TP>0T_P>0TP​>0, H(xP(τ))=1H(x_P(\tau))=1H(xP​(τ))=1, xP′(τ)=RH(xP(τ))x_P'(\tau)=R_H(x_P(\tau))xP′​(τ)=RH​(xP​(τ)) and xP(τ+TP)=xP(τ)x_P(\tau+T_P)=x_P(\tau)xP​(τ+TP​)=xP​(τ) for all τ\tauτ. TPT_PTP​ is any positive period, not necessarily the minimal one, so covers are orbits. PPP is prime when xP(τ)≠xP(0)x_P(\tau)\ne x_P(0)xP​(τ)=xP​(0) for all τ∈(0,TP)\tau\in(0,T_P)τ∈(0,TP​).

Reeb trajectory. Any y:R→Vny:\mathbb{R}\to V_ny:R→Vn​ such that for every t∈Rt\in\mathbb{R}t∈R: H(y(t))=1H(y(t))=1H(y(t))=1 and yyy is differentiable at ttt with y′(t)=RH(y(t))y^\prime(t)=R_H(y(t))y′(t)=RH​(y(t)). Nothing excludes yyy from being periodic or from running along a Reeb orbit.

Nondegenerate orbit. For every Φ:R→L(Vn,Vn)\Phi:\mathbb{R}\to\mathcal{L}(V_n,V_n)Φ:R→L(Vn​,Vn​) with Φ(0)=id\Phi(0)=\mathrm{id}Φ(0)=id and Φ′(τ)=DRH(xQ(τ))∘Φ(τ)\Phi'(\tau)=DR_H(x_Q(\tau))\circ\Phi(\tau)Φ′(τ)=DRH​(xQ​(τ))∘Φ(τ) for all τ\tauτ, and every v∈ξxQ(0)v\in\xi_{x_Q(0)}v∈ξxQ​(0)​: Φ(TQ)v=v\Phi(T_Q)v=vΦ(TQ​)v=v implies v=0v=0v=0. (Vacuous if no such Φ\PhiΦ exists.)

Nondegenerate end at infinity on PPP (with sign +1+1+1; written "uuu has end on PPP"). There exist reals d,cd,cd,c and b>0b>0b>0 such that, as s→+∞s\to+\inftys→+∞ and uniformly in t∈Rt\in\mathbb{R}t∈R,

aH(u(e2π(s+it)))−TPs−d→0,ebs(prH(u(e2π(s+it)))−xP(TPt+c))→0.a_H\big(u(e^{2\pi(s+it)})\big)-T_Ps-d\to0,\qquad e^{bs}\big(\mathrm{pr}_H(u(e^{2\pi(s+it)}))-x_P(T_Pt+c)\big)\to0.aH​(u(e2π(s+it)))−TP​s−d→0,ebs(prH​(u(e2π(s+it)))−xP​(TP​t+c))→0.

Fast plane. u:C→V1u:\mathbb{C}\to V_1u:C→V1​ such that:

  1. uuu is a finite energy curve on C\mathbb{C}C;
  2. there exists a prime Reeb orbit P′P'P′ of HHH on which uuu has an end in the above sense;
  3. with w=prH∘uw=\mathrm{pr}_H\circ uw=prH​∘u and πu(z)=cH(w(z), ∂sw(z)−λw(z)(∂sw(z))RH(w(z)))∈C\pi_u(z)=\mathrm{c}_H\big(w(z),\ \partial_sw(z)-\lambda_{w(z)}(\partial_sw(z))R_H(w(z))\big)\in\mathbb{C}πu​(z)=cH​(w(z), ∂s​w(z)−λw(z)​(∂s​w(z))RH​(w(z)))∈C, the zero set ZZZ of πu\pi_uπu​ is finite, and there are integers idx(z)\mathrm{idx}(z)idx(z), z∈Zz\in Zz∈Z, summing to 000, such that for each z∈Zz\in Zz∈Z there is ρ0>0\rho_0>0ρ0​>0 with πu≠0\pi_u\ne0πu​=0 on Bˉ(z,ρ0)∖{z}\bar B(z,\rho_0)\setminus\{z\}Bˉ(z,ρ0​)∖{z} and, for each ρ∈(0,ρ0)\rho\in(0,\rho_0)ρ∈(0,ρ0​), the loop t↦πu(z+ρe2πit)t\mapsto\pi_u(z+\rho e^{2\pi it})t↦πu​(z+ρe2πit) has winding number idx(z)\mathrm{idx}(z)idx(z).

Here a loop f:R→Cf:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{C}f:R→C "has winding number kkk" when fff is continuous, 111-periodic, nowhere zero, and there is a continuous ϑ:R→R\vartheta:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}ϑ:R→R with f=∣f∣eiϑf=|f|e^{i\vartheta}f=∣f∣eiϑ and ϑ(1)−ϑ(0)=2πk\vartheta(1)-\vartheta(0)=2\pi kϑ(1)−ϑ(0)=2πk. An empty ZZZ satisfies clause 3; the definition allows nonempty ZZZ with indices of mixed sign summing to 000.

The coordinate cH(x,v)∈C\mathrm{c}_H(x,v)\in\mathbb{C}cH​(x,v)∈C is

cH(x,v)=ω0(v,f2(x))+i ω0(f1(x),v),fj(x)=∣x∣−1(Qj(x)−DH(x)[Qj(x)]DH(x)[x] x),\mathrm{c}_H(x,v)=\omega_0(v,f_2(x))+i\,\omega_0(f_1(x),v),\qquad f_j(x)=|x|^{-1}\Big(Q_j(x)-\frac{DH(x)[Q_j(x)]}{DH(x)[x]}\,x\Big),cH​(x,v)=ω0​(v,f2​(x))+iω0​(f1​(x),v),fj​(x)=∣x∣−1(Qj​(x)−DH(x)[x]DH(x)[Qj​(x)]​x),

for x,v∈R4x,v\in\mathbb{R}^4x,v∈R4, with ∣x∣|x|∣x∣ the Euclidean norm, Q1(x)=(x3,x2,−x1,−x0)Q_1(x)=(x_3,x_2,-x_1,-x_0)Q1​(x)=(x3​,x2​,−x1​,−x0​) and Q2(x)=(−x2,x3,x0,−x1)Q_2(x)=(-x_2,x_3,x_0,-x_1)Q2​(x)=(−x2​,x3​,x0​,−x1​).

Embedded plane. u:C→Vnu:\mathbb{C}\to V_nu:C→Vn​ is injective and Du(z)Du(z)Du(z) is an injective linear map for every zzz.

Set E(H,J,P,K,γ)\mathcal{E}(H,J,P,K,\gamma)E(H,J,P,K,γ) of embedded fast planes (K⊆V1K\subseteq V_1K⊆V1​, γ∈R\gamma\in\mathbb{R}γ∈R). All u:C→V1u:\mathbb{C}\to V_1u:C→V1​ that are fast planes, have end on PPP, are embedded planes, have u(0)∈Ku(0)\in Ku(0)∈K, and satisfy

Edλ({∣z∣>1},u)=max⁡(γ,0).E_{d\lambda}(\{|z|>1\},u)=\max(\gamma,0).Edλ​({∣z∣>1},u)=max(γ,0).

When γ≤0\gamma\le0γ≤0 this says the energy on {∣z∣>1}\{|z|>1\}{∣z∣>1} is 000. PPP is not itself required to be prime; the prime orbit P′P'P′ of the fast plane condition is a separate existential.

Cloc∞C^\infty_{\mathrm{loc}}Cloc∞​ convergence on C\mathbb{C}C. vk→vv_k\to vvk​→v means: for every compact K⊆CK\subseteq\mathbb{C}K⊆C and every m∈Nm\in\mathbb{N}m∈N, the mmm-th iterated Fréchet derivatives of vkv_kvk​ converge uniformly on KKK to that of vvv.

Sequential Cloc∞C^\infty_{\mathrm{loc}}Cloc∞​ compactness of a set AAA of maps C→V1\mathbb{C}\to V_1C→V1​. Every sequence in AAA has a subsequence (strictly increasing reindexing) converging in Cloc∞C^\infty_{\mathrm{loc}}Cloc∞​ on C\mathbb{C}C to some element of AAA. The empty set has this property.

Hypothesis "CZ index of QQQ is at least mmm" (for a Reeb orbit QQQ of H:V1→RH:V_1\to\mathbb{R}H:V1​→R, m∈Zm\in\mathbb{Z}m∈Z). Identify V1V_1V1​ with R4\mathbb{R}^4R4 and let R\mathcal{R}R be any periodic orbit of HHH for the Hamiltonian field: R=(xR,TR)\mathcal{R}=(x_{\mathcal{R}},T_{\mathcal{R}})R=(xR​,TR​), TR>0T_{\mathcal{R}}>0TR​>0, xR′=XH(xR)x_{\mathcal{R}}'=X_H(x_{\mathcal{R}})xR′​=XH​(xR​), H(xR)=1H(x_{\mathcal{R}})=1H(xR​)=1, xR(t+TR)=xR(t)x_{\mathcal{R}}(t+T_{\mathcal{R}})=x_{\mathcal{R}}(t)xR​(t+TR​)=xR​(t), where XH=(−∂1H,∂0H,−∂3H,∂2H)X_H=(-\partial_1H,\partial_0H,-\partial_3H,\partial_2H)XH​=(−∂1​H,∂0​H,−∂3​H,∂2​H). Then, for every such R\mathcal{R}R with the same image as QQQ and with action TQ=∫0TRλxR(xR′) dτT_Q=\int_0^{T_{\mathcal{R}}}\lambda_{x_{\mathcal{R}}}(x_{\mathcal{R}}')\,d\tauTQ​=∫0TR​​λxR​​(xR′​)dτ, and for every Y:R→L(R4,R4)Y:\mathbb{R}\to\mathcal{L}(\mathbb{R}^4,\mathbb{R}^4)Y:R→L(R4,R4) with Y(0)=idY(0)=\mathrm{id}Y(0)=id, Y′(t)=DXH(xR(t))∘Y(t)Y'(t)=DX_H(x_{\mathcal{R}}(t))\circ Y(t)Y′(t)=DXH​(xR​(t))∘Y(t), one has m≤cz(φ)m\le\mathrm{cz}(\varphi)m≤cz(φ). Here φ:R→M2(R)\varphi:\mathbb{R}\to M_2(\mathbb{R})φ:R→M2​(R) has entries

φ(τ)ij=(cHR2)i(xR(TRτ), prξ(Y(TRτ)f(j)(xR(0)))),\varphi(\tau)_{ij}=\Big(\mathrm{c}^{\mathbb{R}^2}_H\Big)_i\Big(x_{\mathcal{R}}(T_{\mathcal{R}}\tau),\ \mathrm{pr}^{\xi}\big(Y(T_{\mathcal{R}}\tau)f^{(j)}(x_{\mathcal{R}}(0))\big)\Big),φ(τ)ij​=(cHR2​)i​(xR​(TR​τ), prξ(Y(TR​τ)f(j)(xR​(0)))),

with cHR2\mathrm{c}_H^{\mathbb{R}^2}cHR2​ the real pair (Re cH,Im cH)(\mathrm{Re}\,\mathrm{c}_H,\mathrm{Im}\,\mathrm{c}_H)(RecH​,ImcH​), f(1)=f1f^{(1)}=f_1f(1)=f1​, f(2)=f2f^{(2)}=f_2f(2)=f2​, and prξ(v)=v−λx(v)λx(XH(x))XH(x)\mathrm{pr}^\xi(v)=v-\frac{\lambda_x(v)}{\lambda_x(X_H(x))}X_H(x)prξ(v)=v−λx​(XH​(x))λx​(v)​XH​(x) at x=xR(TRτ)x=x_{\mathcal{R}}(T_{\mathcal{R}}\tau)x=xR​(TR​τ). The integer cz(φ)\mathrm{cz}(\varphi)cz(φ) is: let WWW be the set of numbers (θ(1)−s)/(2π)(\theta(1)-s)/(2\pi)(θ(1)−s)/(2π) over s∈[0,2π]s\in[0,2\pi]s∈[0,2π] and θ\thetaθ continuous on [0,1][0,1][0,1] with θ(0)=s\theta(0)=sθ(0)=s and φ(t)(cos⁡s,sin⁡s)T=r(cos⁡θ(t),sin⁡θ(t))T\varphi(t)(\cos s,\sin s)^{\mathsf T}=r(\cos\theta(t),\sin\theta(t))^{\mathsf T}φ(t)(coss,sins)T=r(cosθ(t),sinθ(t))T for some r>0r>0r>0 for each t∈[0,1]t\in[0,1]t∈[0,1]; let a=inf⁡Wa=\inf Wa=infW, b=sup⁡Wb=\sup Wb=supW (with the convention that both equal 000 if WWW is empty, and each equals 000 if unbounded on its side). Then cz(φ)=2(⌈b⌉−1)\mathrm{cz}(\varphi)=2(\lceil b\rceil-1)cz(φ)=2(⌈b⌉−1) if a≤⌈b⌉−1a\le\lceil b\rceil-1a≤⌈b⌉−1, and cz(φ)=2⌈b⌉−1\mathrm{cz}(\varphi)=2\lceil b\rceil-1cz(φ)=2⌈b⌉−1 otherwise. The hypothesis is universally quantified over R\mathcal{R}R and YYY and so is vacuous if no such pair exists.

Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Nov 4, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by Mazecto · Nov 4, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paperProve2Me Team
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me