Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaGalaxyBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
Log in
← Formalpedia

Families of embedded fast planes through an embedded fast plane

Open
FiniteEnergyPlane.exists_fastPlane_family

by Mazecto · Nov 3, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

fast-planesfredholm-theorypseudoholomorphic-curvesreeb-dynamicssymplectic-geometrysymplectization

Let S=H−1(1)⊂R4S=H^{-1}(1)\subset\mathbb{R}^4S=H−1(1)⊂R4 be a strictly star-shaped level and JJJ a smooth dλ0d\lambda_0dλ0​-compatible complex structure on ξ\xiξ. Let PPP be a periodic Reeb orbit with μCZ(P)≥3\mu_{CZ}(P)\ge3μCZ​(P)≥3 (PPP may be degenerate) and uuu an embedded fast finite-energy plane asymptotic to PPP at ∞\infty∞. Then for every l≥1l\ge1l≥1 there are r>0r>0r>0 and a ClC^lCl embedding f:C×Br(0)→R4f:\mathbb{C}\times B_r(0)\to\mathbb{R}^4f:C×Br​(0)→R4 such that

  1. f(⋅,0)=uf(\cdot,0)=uf(⋅,0)=u;
  2. for every τ∈Br(0)\tau\in B_r(0)τ∈Br​(0), f(⋅,τ)f(\cdot,\tau)f(⋅,τ) is an embedded fast finite-energy plane asymptotic to PPP at ∞\infty∞;
  3. for every sequence ck→0c_k\to0ck​→0 in R\mathbb{R}R there are τk→0\tau_k\to0τk​→0 such that, for all large kkk, τk∈Br(0)\tau_k\in B_r(0)τk​∈Br​(0) and the image of the translation ck⋅uc_k\cdot uck​⋅u equals the image of f(⋅,τk)f(\cdot,\tau_k)f(⋅,τk​).

Formalization Note The puncture at ∞\infty∞ is IsNondegenerateEnd H u cylInf P 1 (nondegenerate in the sense of Hryniewicz 2014, Definition 2.9); "fast" is IsFastPlane, "embedded" is IsEmbeddedPlane. μCZ(P)≥3\mu_{CZ}(P)\ge3μCZ​(P)≥3 is P.IsCZAtLeast 3, the index of the linearized flow along PPP in the global frame of ξ\xiξ; PPP itself need not be nondegenerate. Hryniewicz writes the hypothesis as μ(u~)≥3\mu(\tilde u)\ge3μ(u~)≥3, where μ(u~)\mu(\tilde u)μ(u~) is the index of PPP in the class of trivializations of ξ\xiξ along PPP that extend over the capping disk uuu. On a strictly star-shaped level ξ\xiξ has a global frame, which extends over every capping disk, so μ(u~)\mu(\tilde u)μ(u~) is determined by PPP and equals the index in that frame. Hryniewicz also requires μ(f(⋅,τ))=μ(u~)\mu(f(\cdot,\tau))=\mu(\tilde u)μ(f(⋅,τ))=μ(u~). On a strictly star-shaped level this index depends only on the asymptotic orbit (see above), and every f(⋅,τ)f(\cdot,\tau)f(⋅,τ) is asymptotic to PPP, so the condition is not restated. The parameter τ\tauτ ranges over the open ball Br(0)⊂CB_r(0)\subset\mathbb{C}Br​(0)⊂C, which stands for Hryniewicz's Br(0)⊂R2B_r(0)\subset\mathbb{R}^2Br​(0)⊂R2. "ClC^lCl embedding" is: f:C×C→R4f:\mathbb{C}\times\mathbb{C}\to\mathbb{R}^4f:C×C→R4 is ContDiffOn ℝ l, injective, and has injective derivative at every point of C×Br(0)\mathbb{C}\times B_r(0)C×Br​(0). The translation c⋅uc\cdot uc⋅u is shiftA c u, z↦e2cu(z)z\mapsto e^{2c}u(z)z↦e2cu(z).

Preamble
import Definitions.Def_FiniteEnergyPlane_Fredholm
Formal statement
namespace FiniteEnergyPlane

open MeasureTheory Metric Filter Topology
open scoped ContDiff ENNReal Real

/-- Hryniewicz (Trans. AMS 2012), Lemmas 6.10 and 6.20. Let `u` be an embedded fast finite-energy
plane asymptotic to `P` at `∞`, where the Conley–Zehnder index of `P` is at least `3`. Then for
every `l ≥ 1` there are `r > 0` and a `C^l` embedding `f : ℂ × B_r(0) → V 1` (injective, with
injective derivative) such that `f(·, 0) = u`, and every `f(·, τ)`, `|τ| < r`, is an embedded fast
finite-energy plane asymptotic to `P` at `∞`. Moreover the family contains the small translations
of `u`: if `cₖ → 0` then there are `τₖ → 0` such that, for all large `k`, the image of `cₖ · u`
is the image of `f(·, τₖ)`. -/
theorem exists_fastPlane_family (H : V 1 → ℝ) (hH : IsStrictlyStarShapedLevel H)
    (J : V 1 → V 1 →L[ℝ] V 1) (hJ : IsCompatibleXiStructure H J)
    (P : ReebOrbit H) (hcz : P.IsCZAtLeast 3) (u : ℂ → V 1)
    (hu : IsFastPlane H J u) (huP : IsNondegenerateEnd H u cylInf P 1)
    (hue : IsEmbeddedPlane u) (l : ℕ) (hl : 1 ≤ l) :
    ∃ r > 0, ∃ f : ℂ × ℂ → V 1, ContDiffOn ℝ l f (Set.univ ×ˢ ball (0 : ℂ) r) ∧ Set.InjOn f (Set.univ ×ˢ ball (0 : ℂ) r) ∧
      (∀ p ∈ Set.univ ×ˢ ball (0 : ℂ) r, Function.Injective (fderiv ℝ f p)) ∧
      (∀ z, f (z, 0) = u z) ∧
      (∀ τ ∈ ball (0 : ℂ) r, IsFastPlane H J (fun z => f (z, τ)) ∧
        IsNondegenerateEnd H (fun z => f (z, τ)) cylInf P 1 ∧ IsEmbeddedPlane (fun z => f (z, τ))) ∧
      ∀ c : ℕ → ℝ, Tendsto c atTop (𝓝 0) → ∃ τ : ℕ → ℂ, Tendsto τ atTop (𝓝 0) ∧
        ∀ᶠ k in atTop, τ k ∈ ball (0 : ℂ) r ∧
          Set.range (shiftA (c k) u) = Set.range (fun z => f (z, τ k)) := by
  sorry

end FiniteEnergyPlane
Source
U. Hryniewicz, Fast finite-energy planes in symplectizations and applications, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 364 (2012), 1859–1931, arXiv:0812.4076, Lemmas 6.10 and 6.20; H. Hofer, K. Wysocki, E. Zehnder, Properties of pseudoholomorphic curves in symplectizations III: Fredholm theory, in Topics in Nonlinear Analysis, Progr. Nonlinear Differential Equations Appl. 35, Birkhäuser 1999, 381–475, doi:10.1007/978-3-0348-8765-6_18, Theorems 1.5 and 5.7
Read-back

What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · claude-opus-5-5

Theorem FiniteEnergyPlane.exists_fastPlane_family

Data and hypotheses. Let H:V1→RH:V_1\to\mathbb RH:V1​→R be a strictly star-shaped level and J:V1→EndR(V1)J:V_1\to\mathrm{End}_{\mathbb R}(V_1)J:V1​→EndR​(V1​) a compatible ξ\xiξ-structure for HHH (both defined below). Let PPP be a Reeb orbit of HHH and u:C→V1u:\mathbb C\to V_1u:C→V1​, l∈Nl\in\mathbb Nl∈N, such that:

  • IsCZAtLeast(P,3)\mathrm{IsCZAtLeast}(P,3)IsCZAtLeast(P,3) holds (defined below; this holds vacuously if no Hamiltonian periodic orbit matches PPP in image and action);
  • uuu is a fast plane for H,JH,JH,J (defined below);
  • uuu has a nondegenerate end at ∞\infty∞ asymptotic to PPP (defined below, ε=1\varepsilon=1ε=1);
  • uuu is an embedded plane: uuu is injective on C\mathbb CC and Du(z)Du(z)Du(z) is an injective real-linear map for every z∈Cz\in\mathbb Cz∈C (no properness is included);
  • l≥1l\ge1l≥1.

PPP is not assumed prime. The prime orbit P′P'P′ inside the fast-plane hypothesis is existential; the only stated link between it and PPP is that uuu has nondegenerate ends asymptotic to both.

Conclusion. There exist r>0r>0r>0 and f:C×C→V1f:\mathbb C\times\mathbb C\to V_1f:C×C→V1​ (which may depend on lll) such that, writing Dr=C×B(0,r)\mathcal D_r=\mathbb C\times B(0,r)Dr​=C×B(0,r) with B(0,r)⊂CB(0,r)\subset\mathbb CB(0,r)⊂C the open disc:

  1. fff is ClC^lCl (real) on Dr\mathcal D_rDr​ — of the finite order lll; C∞C^\inftyC∞ regularity is not asserted;
  2. fff is injective on Dr\mathcal D_rDr​;
  3. for every p∈Drp\in\mathcal D_rp∈Dr​, the real derivative Df(p):C×C→V1Df(p):\mathbb C\times\mathbb C\to V_1Df(p):C×C→V1​ is injective (domain and target both have real dimension 444, so this is the same as invertible);
  4. f(z,0)=u(z)f(z,0)=u(z)f(z,0)=u(z) for every z∈Cz\in\mathbb Cz∈C;
  5. for every τ∈B(0,r)\tau\in B(0,r)τ∈B(0,r), the map fτ=f(⋅,τ):C→V1f_\tau=f(\cdot,\tau):\mathbb C\to V_1fτ​=f(⋅,τ):C→V1​ is a fast plane for H,JH,JH,J, has a nondegenerate end at ∞\infty∞ asymptotic to the same PPP (ε=1\varepsilon=1ε=1), and is an embedded plane;
  6. for every real sequence (ck)(c_k)(ck​) with ck→0c_k\to0ck​→0 there is a complex sequence (τk)(\tau_k)(τk​) with τk→0\tau_k\to0τk​→0 and an index k0k_0k0​ such that for all k≥k0k\ge k_0k≥k0​: τk∈B(0,r)\tau_k\in B(0,r)τk​∈B(0,r) and
{e2cku(z):z∈C}={f(z,τk):z∈C}.\{e^{2c_k}u(z):z\in\mathbb C\}=\{f(z,\tau_k):z\in\mathbb C\}.{e2ck​u(z):z∈C}={f(z,τk​):z∈C}.

Item 6 is an equality of images only (the set on the left is the range of the pointwise rescaling z↦e2cku(z)z\mapsto e^{2c_k}u(z)z↦e2ck​u(z)); no relation between the parametrizations is asserted, and for k<k0k<k_0k<k0​ neither τk∈B(0,r)\tau_k\in B(0,r)τk​∈B(0,r) nor the equality is asserted. The radius rrr and the map fff are chosen before the sequence (ck)(c_k)(ck​); (τk)(\tau_k)(τk​) depends on (ck)(c_k)(ck​). The conclusion contains no assertion about energies, about u(0)u(0)u(0), or about fff outside Dr\mathcal D_rDr​.

Setting and notation (unfolded from the imported definitions)

Space. Vn=R2(n+1)V_n=\mathbb R^{2(n+1)}Vn​=R2(n+1) (functions {0,…,2n+1}→R\{0,\dots,2n+1\}\to\mathbb R{0,…,2n+1}→R); all statements here use V1=R4V_1=\mathbb R^4V1​=R4, with coordinates y=(y0,y1,y2,y3)y=(y_0,y_1,y_2,y_3)y=(y0​,y1​,y2​,y3​). The norm on V1V_1V1​ is the sup norm ∥y∥=max⁡k∣yk∣\|y\|=\max_k|y_k|∥y∥=maxk​∣yk​∣; on C\mathbb CC the norm is the modulus, so B(z0,ε)={z∈C:∣z−z0∣<ε}B(z_0,\varepsilon)=\{z\in\mathbb C:|z-z_0|<\varepsilon\}B(z0​,ε)={z∈C:∣z−z0​∣<ε} is a Euclidean open disc. On C×C\mathbb C\times\mathbb CC×C the norm is max⁡(∣z∣,∣τ∣)\max(|z|,|\tau|)max(∣z∣,∣τ∣). "Smooth" (C∞C^\inftyC∞) means infinitely real-differentiable (not analytic).

Linear structure. j0(y)=(−y1, y0, −y3, y2)j_0(y)=(-y_1,\,y_0,\,-y_3,\,y_2)j0​(y)=(−y1​,y0​,−y3​,y2​); ω0(u,v)=⟨j0u,v⟩=u0v1−u1v0+u2v3−u3v2\omega_0(u,v)=\langle j_0u,v\rangle=u_0v_1-u_1v_0+u_2v_3-u_3v_2ω0​(u,v)=⟨j0​u,v⟩=u0​v1​−u1​v0​+u2​v3​−u3​v2​; the Liouville form λx(v)=12 ω0(x,v)\lambda_x(v)=\tfrac12\,\omega_0(x,v)λx​(v)=21​ω0​(x,v).

Hamiltonian data. For H:V1→RH:V_1\to\mathbb RH:V1​→R: ∇H(x)k=dHx(ek)\nabla H(x)_k=dH_x(e_k)∇H(x)k​=dHx​(ek​); XH(x)=j0∇H(x)X_H(x)=j_0\nabla H(x)XH​(x)=j0​∇H(x); the Reeb field R(x)=λx(XH(x))−1 XH(x)R(x)=\lambda_x(X_H(x))^{-1}\,X_H(x)R(x)=λx​(XH​(x))−1XH​(x), with the convention 0−1=00^{-1}=00−1=0 (so R(x)=0R(x)=0R(x)=0 when λx(XH(x))=0\lambda_x(X_H(x))=0λx​(XH​(x))=0). The energy surface is {H=1}\{H=1\}{H=1}.

Hypothesis "HHH is a strictly star-shaped level" (hHhHhH): HHH is C∞C^\inftyC∞ on all of V1V_1V1​; for every u≠0u\ne0u=0 there is a unique r>0r>0r>0 with H(ru)=1H(ru)=1H(ru)=1; and dHx(x)>0dH_x(x)>0dHx​(x)>0 for every xxx with H(x)=1H(x)=1H(x)=1.

Contact plane. v∈ξxv\in\xi_xv∈ξx​ means λx(v)=0\lambda_x(v)=0λx​(v)=0 and dHx(v)=0dH_x(v)=0dHx​(v)=0.

Hypothesis "JJJ is a compatible ξ\xiξ-structure" (hJhJhJ): J:V1→EndR(V1)J:V_1\to\mathrm{End}_{\mathbb R}(V_1)J:V1​→EndR​(V1​) is C∞C^\inftyC∞, and for every xxx with H(x)=1H(x)=1H(x)=1 and all v,w∈ξxv,w\in\xi_xv,w∈ξx​: J(x)v∈ξxJ(x)v\in\xi_xJ(x)v∈ξx​, J(x)J(x)v=−vJ(x)J(x)v=-vJ(x)J(x)v=−v, v≠0⇒ω0(v,J(x)v)>0v\ne0\Rightarrow\omega_0(v,J(x)v)>0v=0⇒ω0​(v,J(x)v)>0, and ω0(J(x)v,J(x)w)=ω0(v,w)\omega_0(J(x)v,J(x)w)=\omega_0(v,w)ω0​(J(x)v,J(x)w)=ω0​(v,w). Nothing is required of J(x)J(x)J(x) off ξx\xi_xξx​, nor for x∉{H=1}x\notin\{H=1\}x∈/{H=1}, beyond smoothness.

Radial coordinates. σ(y)\sigma(y)σ(y) ("scaleToS") is a chosen r>0r>0r>0 with H(ry)=1H(ry)=1H(ry)=1 if such an rrr exists, and the junk value 111 otherwise (e.g. at y=0y=0y=0 when H(0)≠1H(0)\ne1H(0)=1). Then proj(y)=σ(y) y\mathrm{proj}(y)=\sigma(y)\,yproj(y)=σ(y)y and a(y)=−12log⁡σ(y)a(y)=-\tfrac12\log\sigma(y)a(y)=−21​logσ(y).

Almost complex structure J~\tilde JJ~ on V1V_1V1​. For y∈V1y\in V_1y∈V1​ put x=proj(y)x=\mathrm{proj}(y)x=proj(y), r=σ(y)r=\sigma(y)r=σ(y), and the real-linear functionals and map

α(h)=r2 dHx(x) dHx(h),β(h)=r λx(h),w(h)=h−α(h) 2y−β(h) r−1R(x).\alpha(h)=\frac{r}{2\,dH_x(x)}\,dH_x(h),\qquad \beta(h)=r\,\lambda_x(h),\qquad w(h)=h-\alpha(h)\,2y-\beta(h)\,r^{-1}R(x).α(h)=2dHx​(x)r​dHx​(h),β(h)=rλx​(h),w(h)=h−α(h)2y−β(h)r−1R(x).

Then

J~(y)h=α(h) r−1R(x)−β(h) 2y+J(x)(w(h)).\tilde J(y)h=\alpha(h)\,r^{-1}R(x)-\beta(h)\,2y+J(x)\big(w(h)\big).J~(y)h=α(h)r−1R(x)−β(h)2y+J(x)(w(h)).

(Division by 000 again yields 000.)

Partial derivatives. For f:C→Ff:\mathbb C\to Ff:C→F (real vector space), ∂sf(z)=Df(z)(1)\partial_sf(z)=Df(z)(1)∂s​f(z)=Df(z)(1), ∂tf(z)=Df(z)(i)\partial_tf(z)=Df(z)(i)∂t​f(z)=Df(z)(i), where Df(z)Df(z)Df(z) is the real Fréchet derivative (equal to 000 by convention where fff is not differentiable).

J~\tilde JJ~-holomorphic on UUU: for each z∈Uz\in Uz∈U, uuu is real-differentiable at zzz and ∂su(z)+J~(u(z)) ∂tu(z)=0\partial_su(z)+\tilde J(u(z))\,\partial_tu(z)=0∂s​u(z)+J~(u(z))∂t​u(z)=0.

Energy. An admissible φ:R→R\varphi:\mathbb R\to\mathbb Rφ:R→R is C∞C^\inftyC∞, monotone non-decreasing, with 0≤φ≤10\le\varphi\le10≤φ≤1. With au=a∘ua_u=a\circ uau​=a∘u and wu=proj∘uw_u=\mathrm{proj}\circ uwu​=proj∘u, the energy density is

eφ(z)=φ′(au)(∂sau λwu(∂twu)−∂tau λwu(∂swu))+φ(au) ω0(∂swu,∂twu)e_\varphi(z)=\varphi'(a_u)\big(\partial_sa_u\,\lambda_{w_u}(\partial_tw_u)-\partial_ta_u\,\lambda_{w_u}(\partial_sw_u)\big)+\varphi(a_u)\,\omega_0(\partial_sw_u,\partial_tw_u)eφ​(z)=φ′(au​)(∂s​au​λwu​​(∂t​wu​)−∂t​au​λwu​​(∂s​wu​))+φ(au​)ω0​(∂s​wu​,∂t​wu​)

(evaluated at zzz), and

E(U,u)=sup⁡φ admissible∫Umax⁡(eφ(z),0) dz∈[0,∞],E(U,u)=\sup_{\varphi\text{ admissible}}\int_U \max\big(e_\varphi(z),0\big)\,dz\in[0,\infty],E(U,u)=φ admissiblesup​∫U​max(eφ​(z),0)dz∈[0,∞],

i.e. only the positive part of the density is integrated (Lebesgue measure on C\mathbb CC). The dλd\lambdadλ-density is ω0(∂swu,∂twu)\omega_0(\partial_sw_u,\partial_tw_u)ω0​(∂s​wu​,∂t​wu​) and the dλd\lambdadλ-energy is Edλ(U,u)=∫Umax⁡(ω0(∂swu,∂twu),0) dz∈[0,∞]E_{d\lambda}(U,u)=\int_U\max\big(\omega_0(\partial_sw_u,\partial_tw_u),0\big)\,dz\in[0,\infty]Edλ​(U,u)=∫U​max(ω0​(∂s​wu​,∂t​wu​),0)dz∈[0,∞].

Finite-energy curve on UUU (U⊆CU\subseteq\mathbb CU⊆C): u:C→V1u:\mathbb C\to V_1u:C→V1​ is C∞C^\inftyC∞ on UUU, u(z)≠0u(z)\ne0u(z)=0 for all z∈Uz\in Uz∈U, uuu is J~\tilde JJ~-holomorphic on UUU, and E(U,u)<∞E(U,u)<\inftyE(U,u)<∞. (Nothing is required of uuu outside UUU.)

Reeb orbit. A Reeb orbit PPP of HHH consists of xP:R→V1x_P:\mathbb R\to V_1xP​:R→V1​ and TP>0T_P>0TP​>0 with H(xP(τ))=1H(x_P(\tau))=1H(xP​(τ))=1, xP′(τ)=R(xP(τ))x_P'(\tau)=R(x_P(\tau))xP′​(τ)=R(xP​(τ)) for all τ\tauτ, and xP(τ+TP)=xP(τ)x_P(\tau+T_P)=x_P(\tau)xP​(τ+TP​)=xP​(τ) for all τ\tauτ (TPT_PTP​ is a period, not necessarily the minimal one). PPP is prime if xP(τ)≠xP(0)x_P(\tau)\ne x_P(0)xP​(τ)=xP​(0) for all 0<τ<TP0<\tau<T_P0<τ<TP​.

Nondegenerate end at ∞\infty∞ asymptotic to PPP (with sign ε=1\varepsilon=1ε=1 and the chart c∞(s,t)=e2πse2πitc_\infty(s,t)=e^{2\pi s}e^{2\pi i t}c∞​(s,t)=e2πse2πit): there exist d,c∈Rd,c\in\mathbb Rd,c∈R and b>0b>0b>0 such that, uniformly in t∈Rt\in\mathbb Rt∈R (i.e. for every δ>0\delta>0δ>0 there is s0s_0s0​ with the bound for all s≥s0s\ge s_0s≥s0​ and all t∈Rt\in\mathbb Rt∈R),

∣a(u(c∞(s,t)))−TPs−d∣→0,ebs ∥proj(u(c∞(s,t)))−xP(TPt+c)∥→0(s→∞).\big|a(u(c_\infty(s,t)))-T_Ps-d\big|\to0,\qquad e^{bs}\,\big\|\mathrm{proj}(u(c_\infty(s,t)))-x_P(T_Pt+c)\big\|\to0\quad(s\to\infty).​a(u(c∞​(s,t)))−TP​s−d​→0,ebs​proj(u(c∞​(s,t)))−xP​(TP​t+c)​→0(s→∞).

Loop winding. f:R→Cf:\mathbb R\to\mathbb Cf:R→C has winding k∈Zk\in\mathbb Zk∈Z if fff is continuous, 111-periodic, nowhere zero, and there is a continuous θ:R→R\theta:\mathbb R\to\mathbb Rθ:R→R with f(t)=∣f(t)∣eiθ(t)f(t)=|f(t)|e^{i\theta(t)}f(t)=∣f(t)∣eiθ(t) for all ttt and θ(1)−θ(0)=2πk\theta(1)-\theta(0)=2\pi kθ(1)−θ(0)=2πk.

Zero index. f:C→Cf:\mathbb C\to\mathbb Cf:C→C has a zero of index kkk at z0z_0z0​ if f(z0)=0f(z_0)=0f(z0​)=0 and there is r>0r>0r>0 such that f(z)≠0f(z)\ne0f(z)=0 for all zzz in the closed disc B‾(z0,r)\overline B(z_0,r)B(z0​,r) with z≠z0z\ne z_0z=z0​, and for every ρ∈(0,r)\rho\in(0,r)ρ∈(0,r) the loop t↦f(z0+ρe2πit)t\mapsto f(z_0+\rho e^{2\pi it})t↦f(z0​+ρe2πit) has winding kkk.

ξ\xiξ-coordinates. For x∈R4x\in\mathbb R^4x∈R4 let Q1(x)=(−x2,x3,x0,−x1)Q_1(x)=(-x_2,x_3,x_0,-x_1)Q1​(x)=(−x2​,x3​,x0​,−x1​), Q2(x)=(x3,x2,−x1,−x0)Q_2(x)=(x_3,x_2,-x_1,-x_0)Q2​(x)=(x3​,x2​,−x1​,−x0​), ∣x∣|x|∣x∣ the Euclidean norm, Q^(x)=Q(x)−dHx(Q(x))dHx(x) x\hat Q(x)=Q(x)-\dfrac{dH_x(Q(x))}{dH_x(x)}\,xQ^​(x)=Q(x)−dHx​(x)dHx​(Q(x))​x, e1(x)=∣x∣−1Q^2(x)e_1(x)=|x|^{-1}\hat Q_2(x)e1​(x)=∣x∣−1Q^​2​(x), e2(x)=∣x∣−1Q^1(x)e_2(x)=|x|^{-1}\hat Q_1(x)e2​(x)=∣x∣−1Q^​1​(x). Then ξcoordx(v)=ω0(v,e2(x))+i ω0(e1(x),v)∈C\xi\mathrm{coord}_x(v)=\omega_0(v,e_2(x))+i\,\omega_0(e_1(x),v)\in\mathbb Cξcoordx​(v)=ω0​(v,e2​(x))+iω0​(e1​(x),v)∈C. The ξ\xiξ-projection is πξ(x,v)=v−λx(v) R(x)\pi_\xi(x,v)=v-\lambda_x(v)\,R(x)πξ​(x,v)=v−λx​(v)R(x).

π ∂s\pi\,\partial_sπ∂s​ map. With wu=proj∘uw_u=\mathrm{proj}\circ uwu​=proj∘u: π∂su(z)=ξcoordwu(z)(πξ(wu(z),∂swu(z)))∈C\pi\partial_s u(z)=\xi\mathrm{coord}_{w_u(z)}\big(\pi_\xi(w_u(z),\partial_sw_u(z))\big)\in\mathbb Cπ∂s​u(z)=ξcoordwu​(z)​(πξ​(wu​(z),∂s​wu​(z)))∈C.

windπ(u)=0\mathrm{wind}_\pi(u)=0windπ​(u)=0 (with no punctures). The set Z={z∈C:π∂su(z)=0}Z=\{z\in\mathbb C:\pi\partial_su(z)=0\}Z={z∈C:π∂s​u(z)=0} is finite, and there are integers idx(z)\mathrm{idx}(z)idx(z), z∈Zz\in Zz∈Z, such that π∂su\pi\partial_suπ∂s​u has a zero of index idx(z)\mathrm{idx}(z)idx(z) at each z∈Zz\in Zz∈Z and ∑z∈Zidx(z)=0\sum_{z\in Z}\mathrm{idx}(z)=0∑z∈Z​idx(z)=0. (This is a condition on finiteness, isolation-with-index and the index sum; it does not by itself say Z=∅Z=\varnothingZ=∅.)

Fast plane. u:C→V1u:\mathbb C\to V_1u:C→V1​ is a fast plane (for H,JH,JH,J) if: (i) uuu is a finite-energy curve on all of C\mathbb CC; (ii) there exists a prime Reeb orbit P′P'P′ such that uuu has a nondegenerate end at ∞\infty∞ asymptotic to P′P'P′ (as above, ε=1\varepsilon=1ε=1); (iii) windπ(u)=0\mathrm{wind}_\pi(u)=0windπ​(u)=0 in the sense just described.

"PPP has CZ index at least mmm" (IsCZAtLeast(P,m)\mathrm{IsCZAtLeast}(P,m)IsCZAtLeast(P,m)). Let H^=H\hat H=HH^=H viewed on R4\mathbb R^4R4 (the identification V1=R4V_1=\mathbb R^4V1​=R4 is a relabelling of coordinates). The condition is: for every periodic Hamiltonian orbit RRR of H^\hat HH^ — i.e. xR:R→R4x_R:\mathbb R\to\mathbb R^4xR​:R→R4, TR>0T_R>0TR​>0, xR′(t)=XH^(xR(t))x_R'(t)=X_{\hat H}(x_R(t))xR′​(t)=XH^​(xR​(t)) with XH^(x)=(−∂1H^,∂0H^,−∂3H^,∂2H^)(x)X_{\hat H}(x)=(-\partial_1\hat H,\partial_0\hat H,-\partial_3\hat H,\partial_2\hat H)(x)XH^​(x)=(−∂1​H^,∂0​H^,−∂3​H^,∂2​H^)(x), H^(xR(t))=1\hat H(x_R(t))=1H^(xR​(t))=1, xR(t+TR)=xR(t)x_R(t+T_R)=x_R(t)xR​(t+TR​)=xR​(t) — such that

  • xP(R)=xR(R)x_P(\mathbb R)=x_R(\mathbb R)xP​(R)=xR​(R) (equal images), and
  • TP=∫0TRλxR(τ)(xR′(τ)) dτT_P=\int_0^{T_R}\lambda_{x_R(\tau)}\big(x_R'(\tau)\big)\,d\tauTP​=∫0TR​​λxR​(τ)​(xR′​(τ))dτ,

and for every Y:R→End(R4)Y:\mathbb R\to\mathrm{End}(\mathbb R^4)Y:R→End(R4) with Y(0)=idY(0)=\mathrm{id}Y(0)=id and Y′(t)=DXH^(xR(t))∘Y(t)Y'(t)=DX_{\hat H}(x_R(t))\circ Y(t)Y′(t)=DXH^​(xR​(t))∘Y(t) for all ttt, one has m≤μ(ΨR,Y)m\le\mu(\Psi_{R,Y})m≤μ(ΨR,Y​). If no such RRR exists, the condition holds vacuously; it also holds vacuously over YYY if no such YYY exists.

Here ΨR,Y(τ)\Psi_{R,Y}(\tau)ΨR,Y​(τ) is the 2×22\times22×2 real matrix with entries

ΨR,Y(τ)ij=[ξcoordx(v−λx(v)λx(XH^(x))XH^(x))]i,x=xR(TRτ), v=Y(TRτ) fj,\Psi_{R,Y}(\tau)_{ij}=\Big[\xi\mathrm{coord}_{x}\Big(v-\frac{\lambda_x(v)}{\lambda_x(X_{\hat H}(x))}X_{\hat H}(x)\Big)\Big]_i,\quad x=x_R(T_R\tau),\ v=Y(T_R\tau)\,f_j,ΨR,Y​(τ)ij​=[ξcoordx​(v−λx​(XH^​(x))λx​(v)​XH^​(x))]i​,x=xR​(TR​τ), v=Y(TR​τ)fj​,

where f1=e1(xR(0))f_1=e_1(x_R(0))f1​=e1​(xR​(0)), f2=e2(xR(0))f_2=e_2(x_R(0))f2​=e2​(xR​(0)), [⋅]1,[⋅]2[\cdot]_1,[\cdot]_2[⋅]1​,[⋅]2​ denote the real and imaginary parts, and division by zero gives 000.

For a matrix path φ:R→R2×2\varphi:\mathbb R\to\mathbb R^{2\times2}φ:R→R2×2, an angle lift from sss is θ:R→R\theta:\mathbb R\to\mathbb Rθ:R→R continuous on [0,1][0,1][0,1] with θ(0)=s\theta(0)=sθ(0)=s and, for every t∈[0,1]t\in[0,1]t∈[0,1], φ(t)(cos⁡s,sin⁡s)T=ρ (cos⁡θ(t),sin⁡θ(t))T\varphi(t)(\cos s,\sin s)^{\mathsf T}=\rho\,(\cos\theta(t),\sin\theta(t))^{\mathsf T}φ(t)(coss,sins)T=ρ(cosθ(t),sinθ(t))T for some ρ>0\rho>0ρ>0. The winding set is W(φ)={(θ(1)−s)/2π:s∈[0,2π], θ an angle lift from s}\mathcal W(\varphi)=\{(\theta(1)-s)/2\pi : s\in[0,2\pi],\ \theta\text{ an angle lift from }s\}W(φ)={(θ(1)−s)/2π:s∈[0,2π], θ an angle lift from s}. With a=inf⁡Wa=\inf\mathcal Wa=infW, b=sup⁡Wb=\sup\mathcal Wb=supW (real inf⁡/sup⁡\inf/\supinf/sup, which take the junk value 000 when the set is empty or unbounded on that side),

μ(φ)=2(⌈b⌉−1) if a≤⌈b⌉−1,\mu(\varphi)=2(\lceil b\rceil-1)\quad\text{ if }a\le\lceil b\rceil-1,μ(φ)=2(⌈b⌉−1) if a≤⌈b⌉−1,

and otherwise

μ(φ)=2⌈b⌉−1.\mu(\varphi)=2\lceil b\rceil-1.μ(φ)=2⌈b⌉−1.

(For example, if W(φ)=∅\mathcal W(\varphi)=\varnothingW(φ)=∅ then a=b=0a=b=0a=b=0 and μ(φ)=−1\mu(\varphi)=-1μ(φ)=−1.)

Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Nov 4, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by Mazecto · Nov 4, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paperProve2Me Team
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me