Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaGalaxyBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
Log in
← Formalpedia

Theorem 3.11, proof (p. 12) — (1−δ)(1−2α)≤eϵ(δ+2α)(1-\delta)(1-2\alpha) \le e^{\epsilon}(\delta + 2\alpha)(1−δ)(1−2α)≤eϵ(δ+2α) for private useful mechanisms on databases of size n≤VCDIM(C)/2n \le \mathrm{VCDIM}(C)/2n≤VCDIM(C)/2

Proved
PrivateRelease.VCLowerBound.theorem_3_11_explicit

by mikedeng1 · Oct 7, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

differential-privacylower-boundp2o-batch-pfp2bp2o-gran-per-chapterp2o-plan-paperp2o-v1query-releasevc-dimension

Let CCC be a class of predicates on a data universe XXX, and let n≥1n \ge 1n≥1 satisfy 2n≤VCDIM(C)2n \le \mathrm{VCDIM}(C)2n≤VCDIM(C). Let MMM be a mechanism that maps each input database z∈Xnz \in X^nz∈Xn to a probability distribution M(z)M(z)M(z) on an output space OOO, and let ans\mathrm{ans}ans be a readout such that o↦ans(o,φ)o \mapsto \mathrm{ans}(o,\varphi)o↦ans(o,φ) is measurable for every φ∈C\varphi \in Cφ∈C. Suppose that

  1. MMM is ϵ\epsilonϵ-differentially private: Pr⁡[M(z)∈E]≤eϵPr⁡[M(z′)∈E]\Pr[M(z) \in E] \le e^{\epsilon}\Pr[M(z') \in E]Pr[M(z)∈E]≤eϵPr[M(z′)∈E] for every measurable E⊆OE \subseteq OE⊆O and all inputs z,z′z, z'z,z′ that differ in exactly one entry;
  2. MMM is (α,δ)(\alpha,\delta)(α,δ)-useful for CCC, with 0<δ<10 < \delta < 10<δ<1.

Then

(1−δ)(1−2α) ≤ eϵ (δ+2α).(1-\delta)(1-2\alpha) \ \le\ e^{\epsilon}\,(\delta + 2\alpha).(1−δ)(1−2α) ≤ eϵ(δ+2α).

Equivalently α≥(1−δ)−eϵδ2 (1−δ+eϵ)\alpha \ge \dfrac{(1-\delta) - e^{\epsilon}\delta}{2\,(1 - \delta + e^{\epsilon})}α≥2(1−δ+eϵ)(1−δ)−eϵδ​, a positive lower bound on the error whenever δ<1/(1+eϵ)\delta < 1/(1+e^{\epsilon})δ<1/(1+eϵ). This is the inequality that the final display of the paper's proof derives; Theorem 3.11 follows from it.

Formalization Note The paper's display reads exp⁡(2ϵ)≥Pr⁡[x∈T′]/Pr⁡[x∈T^′]≥(1−2α)/(2α)\exp(2\epsilon) \ge \Pr[x \in T']/\Pr[x \in \hat T'] \ge (1-2\alpha)/(2\alpha)exp(2ϵ)≥Pr[x∈T′]/Pr[x∈T^′]≥(1−2α)/(2α): it counts ∣TΔT^∣=2|T \Delta \hat T| = 2∣TΔT^∣=2 under the neighbour relation ∣DΔD′∣≤1|D \Delta D'| \le 1∣DΔD′∣≤1, and it drops the failure probability δ\deltaδ of the two reconstructions. Here neighbours are databases differing in one entry (replace-one), under which TTT and T^=(T∖{x})∪{y}\hat T = (T\setminus\{x\}) \cup \{y\}T^=(T∖{x})∪{y} are neighbours, so the factor is eϵe^{\epsilon}eϵ; and δ\deltaδ is kept. VC-dimension is the N∪{∞}\mathbb N \cup \{\infty\}N∪{∞}-valued supremum of the sizes of shattered sets, so 2n≤VCDIM(C)2n \le \mathrm{VCDIM}(C)2n≤VCDIM(C) also covers infinite VC-dimension. The measurability of the readouts is needed: without it a mechanism into a trivial σ\sigmaσ-algebra is 000-private and the bound fails.

Preamble
import Mathlib
import Definitions.Def_PrivLearn_Generic_Privacy
import Definitions.Def_HighDimProb_Chaining_VcDim
import Definitions.Def_PrivateRelease_VCLowerBound_Queries
Formal statement
namespace PrivateRelease.VCLowerBound

open MeasureTheory

/-- Theorem 3.11, proof (p. 12), with `δ` kept. Let `C` be a class of predicates on `X` and `n ≥ 1`
with `2n ≤ VCDIM(C)`. Let `M` be a mechanism on input databases of size `n` whose outputs are
probability measures on `O`, with a readout `ans` that is measurable in the output for each query of
`C`. If `M` is `ε`-differentially private (replace-one neighbours) and `(α, δ)`-useful for `C` with
`0 < δ < 1`, then `(1 − δ)(1 − 2α) ≤ e^ε (δ + 2α)`. -/
theorem theorem_3_11_explicit {X O : Type} [MeasurableSpace O] (C : Set (X → Bool)) (n : ℕ)
    (M : (Fin n → X) → Measure O) (ans : O → (X → Bool) → ℝ) (ε α δ : ℝ)
    (hn : 1 ≤ n) (hvc : ((2 * n : ℕ) : ℕ∞) ≤ HighDimProb.Chaining.vcDim C)
    (hδ0 : 0 < δ) (hδ1 : δ < 1)
    (hprob : ∀ z, IsProbabilityMeasure (M z))
    (hans : ∀ φ ∈ C, Measurable fun o => ans o φ)
    (hdp : PrivLearn.Generic.IsDP M ε) (huse : IsUseful C α δ M ans) :
    (1 - δ) * (1 - 2 * α) ≤ Real.exp ε * (δ + 2 * α) := by sorry

end PrivateRelease.VCLowerBound
Source
Blum, Ligett, Roth, A Learning Theory Approach to Non-Interactive Database Privacy, arXiv:1109.2229v1 (2011), p. 12, proof of Theorem 3.11 (final display)
Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Oct 8, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by mikedeng1 · Oct 8, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paperProve2Me Team
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me