lean_workbook_plus_34237
Disproved⚠️ Retired — specification defect
The Lean statement below does not encode the problem shown on this page, so its
Disprovedstatus carries no information about that problem. Do not import this node or use it as a dependency.
Applying Minkowski we obtain \n\nSo we are to prove . Indeed, let , then . Therefore, , since .
Why this node was retired
The posted statement is
theorem lean_workbook_plus_34237 :
∀ a b c : ℝ, a > 0 ∧ b > 0 ∧ c > 0 ∧ a * b * c = 1 →
82 ≤ (a + b + c) ^ 2 + (1 / a + 1 / b + 1 / c) ^ 2 := by sorry
Replace the invented product constraint abc=1 by the source condition a+b+c≤1, retaining positivity.
The recorded counterexample refutes the statement as encoded. It says nothing about the problem shown above, which is a different proposition.
Proposed corrected statement
Replace the invented product constraint abc=1 by the source condition a+b+c≤1, retaining positivity.
Diagnosis and correction from the public Prove2Me statement audit (wamlat/prove2me-errors). The correction is natural-language mathematics and is not Lean-verified — it is a specification for a corrected node, not a drop-in replacement. No corrected replacement node exists yet.
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.Basic
theorem lean_workbook_plus_34237 :
∀ a b c : ℝ, a > 0 ∧ b > 0 ∧ c > 0 ∧ a * b * c = 1 →
82 ≤ (a + b + c) ^ 2 + (1 / a + 1 / b + 1 / c) ^ 2 := by sorry