Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Proof of Proposition 4, the special case ρ≤e−2+e−1\rho \le e^{-2+e^{-1}}ρ≤e−2+e−1 — the maximizer p1∗=e−1+e−1p_1^* = e^{-1+e^{-1}}p1∗​=e−1+e−1, p2∗=p1∗/ep_2^* = p_1^*/ep2∗​=p1∗​/e

Proved
SeasonalPricing.MyopicDet.reducedObjective_special_case

by mikedeng1 · Sep 27, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

calculusdynamic-pricingp2o-batch-p200ap2o-gran-per-chapterp2o-plan-paperp2o-v1revenue-management

Let 0<ρ≤e−2+e−10 < \rho \le e^{-2+e^{-1}}0<ρ≤e−2+e−1 and

G(p1,p2)=(p1−p2)⋅ln⁡p1ln⁡ρ+p2⋅ln⁡p2ln⁡ρ,ρ≤p2≤p1≤1.G(p_1, p_2) = (p_1 - p_2)\cdot\frac{\ln p_1}{\ln\rho} + p_2\cdot\frac{\ln p_2}{\ln\rho}, \qquad \rho \le p_2 \le p_1 \le 1 .G(p1​,p2​)=(p1​−p2​)⋅lnρlnp1​​+p2​⋅lnρlnp2​​,ρ≤p2​≤p1​≤1.

Write p1∗=e−1+e−1p_1^* = e^{-1+e^{-1}}p1∗​=e−1+e−1 and p2∗=p1∗/e=e−2+e−1p_2^* = p_1^*/e = e^{-2+e^{-1}}p2∗​=p1∗​/e=e−2+e−1. Then:

  1. the maximum of GGG over the region ρ≤p2≤p1≤1\rho \le p_2 \le p_1 \le 1ρ≤p2​≤p1​≤1 exists and equals −e−1+e−1/ln⁡ρ-e^{-1+e^{-1}}/\ln\rho−e−1+e−1/lnρ;
  2. (p1∗,p2∗)(p_1^*, p_2^*)(p1∗​,p2∗​) lies in the region (ρ≤p2∗\rho \le p_2^*ρ≤p2∗​ and p1∗≤1p_1^* \le 1p1∗​≤1) and G(p1∗,p2∗)=−e−1+e−1/ln⁡ρG(p_1^*, p_2^*) = -e^{-1+e^{-1}}/\ln\rhoG(p1∗​,p2∗​)=−e−1+e−1/lnρ;
  3. (p1∗,p2∗)(p_1^*, p_2^*)(p1∗​,p2∗​) is the only maximizer in the region.

The paper states "the special case ρ≤e−2+e−1\rho \le e^{-2+e^{-1}}ρ≤e−2+e−1 could be easily solved analytically to yield the results stated in the proposition"; this item is that calculation. Uniqueness is stated because Proposition 4 names "the prices p1∗p_1^*p1∗​ and p2∗p_2^*p2∗​ that solve the problem" and gives their values.

Preamble
import Mathlib
import Definitions.Def_SeasonalPricing_MyopicDet_reducedObjective
Formal statement
namespace SeasonalPricing.MyopicDet

/-- Proof of Proposition 4, the special case (Aviv–Pazgal 2008, pp. 351, 359): if
`0 < ρ ≤ e^{−2+e^{−1}}`, the maximum of `(p₁ − p₂) ln(p₁)/ln(ρ) + p₂ ln(p₂)/ln(ρ)` over
`ρ ≤ p₂ ≤ p₁ ≤ 1` equals `−e^{−1+e^{−1}}/ln(ρ)`, and it is attained exactly at
`p₁* = e^{−1+e^{−1}}`, `p₂* = p₁*/e`. -/
theorem reducedObjective_special_case (ρ : ℝ) (hρ0 : 0 < ρ)
    (hρ : ρ ≤ Real.exp (-2 + Real.exp (-1))) :
    IsGreatest {g : ℝ | ∃ p1 p2 : ℝ, ρ ≤ p2 ∧ p2 ≤ p1 ∧ p1 ≤ 1 ∧ g = reducedObjective ρ p1 p2}
        (-Real.exp (-1 + Real.exp (-1)) / Real.log ρ) ∧
      ρ ≤ Real.exp (-1 + Real.exp (-1)) / Real.exp 1 ∧
      Real.exp (-1 + Real.exp (-1)) ≤ 1 ∧
      reducedObjective ρ (Real.exp (-1 + Real.exp (-1)))
          (Real.exp (-1 + Real.exp (-1)) / Real.exp 1) =
        -Real.exp (-1 + Real.exp (-1)) / Real.log ρ ∧
      ∀ p1 p2 : ℝ, ρ ≤ p2 → p2 ≤ p1 → p1 ≤ 1 →
        reducedObjective ρ p1 p2 = -Real.exp (-1 + Real.exp (-1)) / Real.log ρ →
          p1 = Real.exp (-1 + Real.exp (-1)) ∧ p2 = Real.exp (-1 + Real.exp (-1)) / Real.exp 1 := by sorry

end SeasonalPricing.MyopicDet
Source
Aviv and Pazgal, Optimal Pricing of Seasonal Products in the Presence of Forward-Looking Consumers, Manufacturing & Service Operations Management 10(3), 2008, p. 351, Proposition 4 (p*₁ = e^{−1+e^{−1}}, p*₂ = p*₁/e); p. 359, Proof of Proposition 4 ("The special case …")
Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Oct 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by mikedeng1 · Oct 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me