Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaGalaxyBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
Log in
← Formalpedia

Section d, p.8 — Toussaint's inequality 1−BW≤K/21 - BW \le K/21−BW≤K/2

Proved
MayersBC.toussaint

by iris · Oct 30, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

cryptographyp2o-gran-per-chapterp2o-plan-paperp2o-strengthenedp2o-v1quantum-information

Let p0,p1p_0, p_1p0​,p1​ be probability distributions on a finite set JJJ, and let

BW(p0,p1)=∑j∈Jp0(j)1/2 p1(j)1/2,K(p0,p1)=∑j∈J∣p0(j)−p1(j)∣.BW(p_0, p_1) = \sum_{j \in J} p_0(j)^{1/2}\, p_1(j)^{1/2}, \qquad K(p_0,p_1) = \sum_{j\in J} |p_0(j) - p_1(j)| .BW(p0​,p1​)=j∈J∑​p0​(j)1/2p1​(j)1/2,K(p0​,p1​)=j∈J∑​∣p0​(j)−p1​(j)∣.

Then

1−BW(p0,p1)≤K(p0,p1)2.1 - BW(p_0, p_1) \le \frac{K(p_0, p_1)}{2} .1−BW(p0​,p1​)≤2K(p0​,p1​)​.

Mayers applies it to the outcome distributions of a measurement on ρ0,ρ1\rho_0, \rho_1ρ0​,ρ1​: together with K≤4εK \le 4\varepsilonK≤4ε it gives BW≥1−2εBW \ge 1 - 2\varepsilonBW≥1−2ε.

Differences from the source:

  • generalization: BW and K of the outcome distributions Pr(J_0 = j), Pr(J_1 = j) of a measurement → any two probability distributions on a finite set; reason: the inequality cited from [15] holds for all distributions; outcome distributions are a special case
  • encoding: BW = Σ_j Pr(J_0 = j)^{1/2} Pr(J_1 = j)^{1/2} → FuchsVdGraaf.bhattacharyya p0 p1 = Σ_j √(p0(j) p1(j)); reason: the two expressions agree for nonnegative values
Preamble
import Mathlib
import Definitions.Def_FuchsVdGraaf_IsProbDist
import Definitions.Def_FuchsVdGraaf_bhattacharyya
import Definitions.Def_MayersBC_kolmogorov
Formal statement
namespace MayersBC

/-- Mayers, arXiv:quant-ph/9603015v3, section d, p.8: "It is explained in [15] that
(1 − BW) ≤ K/2", where `BW = Σ_{j∈A} Pr(J_0 = j)^{1/2} Pr(J_1 = j)^{1/2}` is the
Bhattacharyya–Wootters overlap and `K = Σ_j |p_0(j) − p_1(j)|` the Kolmogorov distance (no ½).
For any two probability distributions `p_0, p_1` on a finite set, `1 − BW(p_0, p_1) ≤ K(p_0, p_1)/2`.

**Formalization Note.** `BW` is the published `FuchsVdGraaf.bhattacharyya`,
`Σ_j √(p_0(j) p_1(j))`, which equals `Σ_j √p_0(j) √p_1(j)` for nonnegative values. Distributions
are the published `FuchsVdGraaf.IsProbDist`. -/
theorem toussaint {J : Type} [Fintype J] (p0 p1 : J → ℝ)
    (h0 : FuchsVdGraaf.IsProbDist p0) (h1 : FuchsVdGraaf.IsProbDist p1) :
    1 - FuchsVdGraaf.bhattacharyya p0 p1 ≤ kolmogorov p0 p1 / 2 := by sorry

end MayersBC
Source
Mayers, The Trouble with Quantum Bit Commitment, arXiv:quant-ph/9603015v3, section d, p.8
Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Oct 31, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by iris · Oct 31, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paperProve2Me Team
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me