Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaGalaxyBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
Log in
← Formalpedia

Embedded planes, translations in the symplectization, and the set Λ(K,P)\Lambda(K,P)Λ(K,P)

Definition
FiniteEnergyPlane_Fredholm

by Mazecto · Nov 3, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

fast-planesfredholm-theorypseudoholomorphic-curvesreeb-dynamicssymplectic-geometrysymplectization

Embedded planes and translations in the symplectization of a strictly star-shaped level S=H−1(1)⊂R4S=H^{-1}(1)\subset\mathbb{R}^4S=H−1(1)⊂R4, in the setting of FiniteEnergyPlane_Setting, FiniteEnergyPlane_Asymptotics, FiniteEnergyPlane_Winding and FiniteEnergyPlane_Compactness with n=1n=1n=1 (U. Hryniewicz 2012, § 2). The symplectization R×S\mathbb{R}\times SR×S is R4∖{0}\mathbb{R}^4\setminus\{0\}R4∖{0} with y=e2axy=e^{2a}xy=e2ax, x∈Sx\in Sx∈S; a plane u~=(a,u)\tilde u=(a,u)u~=(a,u) is a map C→R4\mathbb{C}\to\mathbb{R}^4C→R4 whose SSS-component is proj∘u~\mathrm{proj}\circ\tilde uproj∘u~.

  1. Embedded plane. A map u:C→R2n+2u:\mathbb{C}\to\mathbb{R}^{2n+2}u:C→R2n+2 is an embedded plane if it is injective and its derivative du(z)du(z)du(z) is injective at every z∈Cz\in\mathbb{C}z∈C.
  2. Translation (Hryniewicz, Remark 3.10). For c∈Rc\in\mathbb{R}c∈R, c⋅uc\cdot uc⋅u is the map z↦e2cu(z)z\mapsto e^{2c}u(z)z↦e2cu(z). It adds ccc to the R\mathbb{R}R-coordinate a∘ua\circ ua∘u and leaves the SSS-component unchanged.
  3. The set Λ(K,P)\Lambda(K,P)Λ(K,P) (Hryniewicz (8)). For a periodic Reeb orbit PPP, a set K⊂R4K\subset\mathbb{R}^4K⊂R4 and γ∈R\gamma\in\mathbb{R}γ∈R: the embedded planes in the set Θ(K,P)\Theta(K,P)Θ(K,P) of FiniteEnergyPlane_Compactness (fast planes asymptotic to PPP at ∞\infty∞ with u(0)∈Ku(0)\in Ku(0)∈K and dλd\lambdadλ-energy γ\gammaγ outside the closed unit disk).

Formalization Note "Embedded" is stated as an injective immersion. Hryniewicz's "embedded" asks for an embedding, i.e. in addition a homeomorphism onto the image. The two agree for the planes of this mission: a finite-energy plane with a nondegenerate puncture at ∞\infty∞ is a proper map (its R\mathbb{R}R-coordinate tends to +∞+\infty+∞ at ∞\infty∞), and a proper injective immersion is an embedding. Λ(K,P)\Lambda(K,P)Λ(K,P) is embeddedFastPlaneSet H J P K γ.

Definition code
import Definitions.Def_FiniteEnergyPlane_Compactness

/-!
# Embedded fast finite-energy planes and translations in the symplectization

U. Hryniewicz, *Fast finite-energy planes in symplectizations and applications*, Trans. AMS 364
(2012), § 2 ((8), (10), Theorem 2.3) and § 6. Everything is in the setting of
`FiniteEnergyPlane_Setting`, `FiniteEnergyPlane_Asymptotics`, `FiniteEnergyPlane_Winding` and
`FiniteEnergyPlane_Compactness` for `n = 1`: `S = H⁻¹(1) ⊂ V 1 = ℝ⁴` strictly star-shaped, and the
symplectization `ℝ × S` is `V 1 \ {0}` with `y = e^{2 aCoord y} • proj y`.

Conventions.
* A plane `ũ = (a, u) : ℂ → ℝ × S` is a map `u : ℂ → V 1`; its `S`-component is `proj H ∘ u`.
* The translation `c · ũ = (a + c, u)` of Hryniewicz, Remark 3.10, is `y ↦ e^{2c} • y` in `V 1`.
-/

namespace FiniteEnergyPlane

noncomputable section

open MeasureTheory Metric Filter Topology
open scoped ContDiff ENNReal Real

/-- `u : ℂ → V n` is an embedded plane: `u` is injective and its derivative is injective at every
point. -/
def IsEmbeddedPlane {n : ℕ} (u : ℂ → V n) : Prop :=
  Function.Injective u ∧ ∀ z, Function.Injective (fderiv ℝ u z)

/-- Hryniewicz, Remark 3.10: the translation `c · u` of `u` in the `ℝ`-direction of the
symplectization, `(c · u)(z) = e^{2c} • u(z)`. It adds `c` to `aCoord H ∘ u` and leaves
`proj H ∘ u` unchanged. -/
def shiftA {n : ℕ} (c : ℝ) (u : ℂ → V n) : ℂ → V n := fun z => Real.exp (2 * c) • u z

/-- Hryniewicz (2012), (8): the set `Λ(K, P)` of embedded planes in `Θ(K, P)`. -/
def embeddedFastPlaneSet (H : V 1 → ℝ) (J : V 1 → V 1 →L[ℝ] V 1) (P : ReebOrbit H)
    (K : Set (V 1)) (γ : ℝ) : Set (ℂ → V 1) :=
  {u | u ∈ fastPlaneSet H J P K γ ∧ IsEmbeddedPlane u}

end

end FiniteEnergyPlane
Source
U. Hryniewicz, Fast finite-energy planes in symplectizations and applications, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 364 (2012), 1859–1931, arXiv:0812.4076, Section 2, formula (8) and Theorem 2.3, and Remark 3.10
Read-back

What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · claude-opus-5-5

Definition module FiniteEnergyPlane_Fredholm (Def_FiniteEnergyPlane_Fredholm.lean)

The module contains three definitions, in the namespace FiniteEnergyPlane. They assume nothing about HHH, JJJ, PPP, KKK or γ\gammaγ: strict star-shapedness and compatibility (described in the setting below) are not part of these definitions, so the junk-value conventions below apply for arbitrary H,JH,JH,J.

1. Embedded plane (IsEmbeddedPlane). For any nnn and any u:C→Vn=R2(n+1)u:\mathbb C\to V_n=\mathbb R^{2(n+1)}u:C→Vn​=R2(n+1): uuu is an embedded plane if

  • uuu is injective on all of C\mathbb CC, and
  • for every z∈Cz\in\mathbb Cz∈C the real Fréchet derivative Du(z):C→VnDu(z):\mathbb C\to V_nDu(z):C→Vn​ is injective as a real-linear map.

The derivative is 000 by convention at points where uuu is not differentiable, and 000 is not injective, so the second clause entails real differentiability at every point of C\mathbb CC. No properness, closedness of the image, or homeomorphism-onto-image condition is included, and no smoothness beyond this.

2. Shift (shiftA). For any nnn, any c∈Rc\in\mathbb Rc∈R and any u:C→Vnu:\mathbb C\to V_nu:C→Vn​, the map shiftAc(u):C→Vn\mathrm{shiftA}_c(u):\mathbb C\to V_nshiftAc​(u):C→Vn​ is

shiftAc(u)(z)=e2c u(z),\mathrm{shiftA}_c(u)(z)=e^{2c}\,u(z),shiftAc​(u)(z)=e2cu(z),

pointwise scalar multiplication of the values by e2ce^{2c}e2c.

3. Set of embedded fast planes (embeddedFastPlaneSet). For H:V1→RH:V_1\to\mathbb RH:V1​→R, J:V1→EndR(V1)J:V_1\to\mathrm{End}_{\mathbb R}(V_1)J:V1​→EndR​(V1​), a Reeb orbit PPP of HHH, a subset K⊆V1K\subseteq V_1K⊆V1​ and γ∈R\gamma\in\mathbb Rγ∈R, this is the set of all u:C→V1u:\mathbb C\to V_1u:C→V1​ such that

  • uuu is a fast plane for H,JH,JH,J (defined below; this contains its own existential prime orbit P′P'P′, which is not tied to PPP by this clause);
  • uuu has a nondegenerate end at ∞\infty∞ asymptotic to the given PPP (defined below, ε=1\varepsilon=1ε=1; PPP is not assumed prime);
  • u(0)∈Ku(0)\in Ku(0)∈K;
  • Edλ({z:∣z∣>1},u)=ofReal(γ)E_{d\lambda}(\{z:|z|>1\},u)=\mathrm{ofReal}(\gamma)Edλ​({z:∣z∣>1},u)=ofReal(γ) in [0,∞][0,\infty][0,∞], where ofReal(γ)=γ\mathrm{ofReal}(\gamma)=\gammaofReal(γ)=γ for γ≥0\gamma\ge0γ≥0 and ofReal(γ)=0\mathrm{ofReal}(\gamma)=0ofReal(γ)=0 for γ<0\gamma<0γ<0 (so for every γ≤0\gamma\le0γ≤0 this clause says the dλd\lambdadλ-energy on {∣z∣>1}\{|z|>1\}{∣z∣>1} equals 000);
  • uuu is an embedded plane in the sense of item 1.

(The first four clauses are the imported set fastPlaneSet.) If K=∅K=\varnothingK=∅ the set is empty.

Setting and notation (unfolded from the imported definitions)

Space. Vn=R2(n+1)V_n=\mathbb R^{2(n+1)}Vn​=R2(n+1) (functions {0,…,2n+1}→R\{0,\dots,2n+1\}\to\mathbb R{0,…,2n+1}→R); the material below applies to item 3 and uses V1=R4V_1=\mathbb R^4V1​=R4, with coordinates y=(y0,y1,y2,y3)y=(y_0,y_1,y_2,y_3)y=(y0​,y1​,y2​,y3​); items 1 and 2 hold for any VnV_nVn​, which also carries the sup norm. The norm on V1V_1V1​ is the sup norm ∥y∥=max⁡k∣yk∣\|y\|=\max_k|y_k|∥y∥=maxk​∣yk​∣; on C\mathbb CC the norm is the modulus, so B(z0,ε)={z∈C:∣z−z0∣<ε}B(z_0,\varepsilon)=\{z\in\mathbb C:|z-z_0|<\varepsilon\}B(z0​,ε)={z∈C:∣z−z0​∣<ε} is a Euclidean open disc. On C×C\mathbb C\times\mathbb CC×C the norm is max⁡(∣z∣,∣τ∣)\max(|z|,|\tau|)max(∣z∣,∣τ∣). "Smooth" (C∞C^\inftyC∞) means infinitely real-differentiable (not analytic).

Linear structure. j0(y)=(−y1, y0, −y3, y2)j_0(y)=(-y_1,\,y_0,\,-y_3,\,y_2)j0​(y)=(−y1​,y0​,−y3​,y2​); ω0(u,v)=⟨j0u,v⟩=u0v1−u1v0+u2v3−u3v2\omega_0(u,v)=\langle j_0u,v\rangle=u_0v_1-u_1v_0+u_2v_3-u_3v_2ω0​(u,v)=⟨j0​u,v⟩=u0​v1​−u1​v0​+u2​v3​−u3​v2​; the Liouville form λx(v)=12 ω0(x,v)\lambda_x(v)=\tfrac12\,\omega_0(x,v)λx​(v)=21​ω0​(x,v).

Hamiltonian data. For H:V1→RH:V_1\to\mathbb RH:V1​→R: ∇H(x)k=dHx(ek)\nabla H(x)_k=dH_x(e_k)∇H(x)k​=dHx​(ek​); XH(x)=j0∇H(x)X_H(x)=j_0\nabla H(x)XH​(x)=j0​∇H(x); the Reeb field R(x)=λx(XH(x))−1 XH(x)R(x)=\lambda_x(X_H(x))^{-1}\,X_H(x)R(x)=λx​(XH​(x))−1XH​(x), with the convention 0−1=00^{-1}=00−1=0 (so R(x)=0R(x)=0R(x)=0 when λx(XH(x))=0\lambda_x(X_H(x))=0λx​(XH​(x))=0). The energy surface is {H=1}\{H=1\}{H=1}.

Hypothesis "HHH is a strictly star-shaped level" (hHhHhH): HHH is C∞C^\inftyC∞ on all of V1V_1V1​; for every u≠0u\ne0u=0 there is a unique r>0r>0r>0 with H(ru)=1H(ru)=1H(ru)=1; and dHx(x)>0dH_x(x)>0dHx​(x)>0 for every xxx with H(x)=1H(x)=1H(x)=1.

Contact plane. v∈ξxv\in\xi_xv∈ξx​ means λx(v)=0\lambda_x(v)=0λx​(v)=0 and dHx(v)=0dH_x(v)=0dHx​(v)=0.

Hypothesis "JJJ is a compatible ξ\xiξ-structure" (hJhJhJ): J:V1→EndR(V1)J:V_1\to\mathrm{End}_{\mathbb R}(V_1)J:V1​→EndR​(V1​) is C∞C^\inftyC∞, and for every xxx with H(x)=1H(x)=1H(x)=1 and all v,w∈ξxv,w\in\xi_xv,w∈ξx​: J(x)v∈ξxJ(x)v\in\xi_xJ(x)v∈ξx​, J(x)J(x)v=−vJ(x)J(x)v=-vJ(x)J(x)v=−v, v≠0⇒ω0(v,J(x)v)>0v\ne0\Rightarrow\omega_0(v,J(x)v)>0v=0⇒ω0​(v,J(x)v)>0, and ω0(J(x)v,J(x)w)=ω0(v,w)\omega_0(J(x)v,J(x)w)=\omega_0(v,w)ω0​(J(x)v,J(x)w)=ω0​(v,w). Nothing is required of J(x)J(x)J(x) off ξx\xi_xξx​, nor for x∉{H=1}x\notin\{H=1\}x∈/{H=1}, beyond smoothness.

Radial coordinates. σ(y)\sigma(y)σ(y) ("scaleToS") is a chosen r>0r>0r>0 with H(ry)=1H(ry)=1H(ry)=1 if such an rrr exists, and the junk value 111 otherwise (e.g. at y=0y=0y=0 when H(0)≠1H(0)\ne1H(0)=1). Then proj(y)=σ(y) y\mathrm{proj}(y)=\sigma(y)\,yproj(y)=σ(y)y and a(y)=−12log⁡σ(y)a(y)=-\tfrac12\log\sigma(y)a(y)=−21​logσ(y).

Almost complex structure J~\tilde JJ~ on V1V_1V1​. For y∈V1y\in V_1y∈V1​ put x=proj(y)x=\mathrm{proj}(y)x=proj(y), r=σ(y)r=\sigma(y)r=σ(y), and the real-linear functionals and map

α(h)=r2 dHx(x) dHx(h),β(h)=r λx(h),w(h)=h−α(h) 2y−β(h) r−1R(x).\alpha(h)=\frac{r}{2\,dH_x(x)}\,dH_x(h),\qquad \beta(h)=r\,\lambda_x(h),\qquad w(h)=h-\alpha(h)\,2y-\beta(h)\,r^{-1}R(x).α(h)=2dHx​(x)r​dHx​(h),β(h)=rλx​(h),w(h)=h−α(h)2y−β(h)r−1R(x).

Then

J~(y)h=α(h) r−1R(x)−β(h) 2y+J(x)(w(h)).\tilde J(y)h=\alpha(h)\,r^{-1}R(x)-\beta(h)\,2y+J(x)\big(w(h)\big).J~(y)h=α(h)r−1R(x)−β(h)2y+J(x)(w(h)).

(Division by 000 again yields 000.)

Partial derivatives. For f:C→Ff:\mathbb C\to Ff:C→F (real vector space), ∂sf(z)=Df(z)(1)\partial_sf(z)=Df(z)(1)∂s​f(z)=Df(z)(1), ∂tf(z)=Df(z)(i)\partial_tf(z)=Df(z)(i)∂t​f(z)=Df(z)(i), where Df(z)Df(z)Df(z) is the real Fréchet derivative (equal to 000 by convention where fff is not differentiable).

J~\tilde JJ~-holomorphic on UUU: for each z∈Uz\in Uz∈U, uuu is real-differentiable at zzz and ∂su(z)+J~(u(z)) ∂tu(z)=0\partial_su(z)+\tilde J(u(z))\,\partial_tu(z)=0∂s​u(z)+J~(u(z))∂t​u(z)=0.

Energy. An admissible φ:R→R\varphi:\mathbb R\to\mathbb Rφ:R→R is C∞C^\inftyC∞, monotone non-decreasing, with 0≤φ≤10\le\varphi\le10≤φ≤1. With au=a∘ua_u=a\circ uau​=a∘u and wu=proj∘uw_u=\mathrm{proj}\circ uwu​=proj∘u, the energy density is

eφ(z)=φ′(au)(∂sau λwu(∂twu)−∂tau λwu(∂swu))+φ(au) ω0(∂swu,∂twu)e_\varphi(z)=\varphi'(a_u)\big(\partial_sa_u\,\lambda_{w_u}(\partial_tw_u)-\partial_ta_u\,\lambda_{w_u}(\partial_sw_u)\big)+\varphi(a_u)\,\omega_0(\partial_sw_u,\partial_tw_u)eφ​(z)=φ′(au​)(∂s​au​λwu​​(∂t​wu​)−∂t​au​λwu​​(∂s​wu​))+φ(au​)ω0​(∂s​wu​,∂t​wu​)

(evaluated at zzz), and

E(U,u)=sup⁡φ admissible∫Umax⁡(eφ(z),0) dz∈[0,∞],E(U,u)=\sup_{\varphi\text{ admissible}}\int_U \max\big(e_\varphi(z),0\big)\,dz\in[0,\infty],E(U,u)=φ admissiblesup​∫U​max(eφ​(z),0)dz∈[0,∞],

i.e. only the positive part of the density is integrated (Lebesgue measure on C\mathbb CC). The dλd\lambdadλ-density is ω0(∂swu,∂twu)\omega_0(\partial_sw_u,\partial_tw_u)ω0​(∂s​wu​,∂t​wu​) and the dλd\lambdadλ-energy is Edλ(U,u)=∫Umax⁡(ω0(∂swu,∂twu),0) dz∈[0,∞]E_{d\lambda}(U,u)=\int_U\max\big(\omega_0(\partial_sw_u,\partial_tw_u),0\big)\,dz\in[0,\infty]Edλ​(U,u)=∫U​max(ω0​(∂s​wu​,∂t​wu​),0)dz∈[0,∞].

Finite-energy curve on UUU (U⊆CU\subseteq\mathbb CU⊆C): u:C→V1u:\mathbb C\to V_1u:C→V1​ is C∞C^\inftyC∞ on UUU, u(z)≠0u(z)\ne0u(z)=0 for all z∈Uz\in Uz∈U, uuu is J~\tilde JJ~-holomorphic on UUU, and E(U,u)<∞E(U,u)<\inftyE(U,u)<∞. (Nothing is required of uuu outside UUU.)

Reeb orbit. A Reeb orbit PPP of HHH consists of xP:R→V1x_P:\mathbb R\to V_1xP​:R→V1​ and TP>0T_P>0TP​>0 with H(xP(τ))=1H(x_P(\tau))=1H(xP​(τ))=1, xP′(τ)=R(xP(τ))x_P'(\tau)=R(x_P(\tau))xP′​(τ)=R(xP​(τ)) for all τ\tauτ, and xP(τ+TP)=xP(τ)x_P(\tau+T_P)=x_P(\tau)xP​(τ+TP​)=xP​(τ) for all τ\tauτ (TPT_PTP​ is a period, not necessarily the minimal one). PPP is prime if xP(τ)≠xP(0)x_P(\tau)\ne x_P(0)xP​(τ)=xP​(0) for all 0<τ<TP0<\tau<T_P0<τ<TP​.

Nondegenerate end at ∞\infty∞ asymptotic to PPP (with sign ε=1\varepsilon=1ε=1 and the chart c∞(s,t)=e2πse2πitc_\infty(s,t)=e^{2\pi s}e^{2\pi i t}c∞​(s,t)=e2πse2πit): there exist d,c∈Rd,c\in\mathbb Rd,c∈R and b>0b>0b>0 such that, uniformly in t∈Rt\in\mathbb Rt∈R (i.e. for every δ>0\delta>0δ>0 there is s0s_0s0​ with the bound for all s≥s0s\ge s_0s≥s0​ and all t∈Rt\in\mathbb Rt∈R),

∣a(u(c∞(s,t)))−TPs−d∣→0,ebs ∥proj(u(c∞(s,t)))−xP(TPt+c)∥→0(s→∞).\big|a(u(c_\infty(s,t)))-T_Ps-d\big|\to0,\qquad e^{bs}\,\big\|\mathrm{proj}(u(c_\infty(s,t)))-x_P(T_Pt+c)\big\|\to0\quad(s\to\infty).​a(u(c∞​(s,t)))−TP​s−d​→0,ebs​proj(u(c∞​(s,t)))−xP​(TP​t+c)​→0(s→∞).

Loop winding. f:R→Cf:\mathbb R\to\mathbb Cf:R→C has winding k∈Zk\in\mathbb Zk∈Z if fff is continuous, 111-periodic, nowhere zero, and there is a continuous θ:R→R\theta:\mathbb R\to\mathbb Rθ:R→R with f(t)=∣f(t)∣eiθ(t)f(t)=|f(t)|e^{i\theta(t)}f(t)=∣f(t)∣eiθ(t) for all ttt and θ(1)−θ(0)=2πk\theta(1)-\theta(0)=2\pi kθ(1)−θ(0)=2πk.

Zero index. f:C→Cf:\mathbb C\to\mathbb Cf:C→C has a zero of index kkk at z0z_0z0​ if f(z0)=0f(z_0)=0f(z0​)=0 and there is r>0r>0r>0 such that f(z)≠0f(z)\ne0f(z)=0 for all zzz in the closed disc B‾(z0,r)\overline B(z_0,r)B(z0​,r) with z≠z0z\ne z_0z=z0​, and for every ρ∈(0,r)\rho\in(0,r)ρ∈(0,r) the loop t↦f(z0+ρe2πit)t\mapsto f(z_0+\rho e^{2\pi it})t↦f(z0​+ρe2πit) has winding kkk.

ξ\xiξ-coordinates. For x∈R4x\in\mathbb R^4x∈R4 let Q1(x)=(−x2,x3,x0,−x1)Q_1(x)=(-x_2,x_3,x_0,-x_1)Q1​(x)=(−x2​,x3​,x0​,−x1​), Q2(x)=(x3,x2,−x1,−x0)Q_2(x)=(x_3,x_2,-x_1,-x_0)Q2​(x)=(x3​,x2​,−x1​,−x0​), ∣x∣|x|∣x∣ the Euclidean norm, Q^(x)=Q(x)−dHx(Q(x))dHx(x) x\hat Q(x)=Q(x)-\dfrac{dH_x(Q(x))}{dH_x(x)}\,xQ^​(x)=Q(x)−dHx​(x)dHx​(Q(x))​x, e1(x)=∣x∣−1Q^2(x)e_1(x)=|x|^{-1}\hat Q_2(x)e1​(x)=∣x∣−1Q^​2​(x), e2(x)=∣x∣−1Q^1(x)e_2(x)=|x|^{-1}\hat Q_1(x)e2​(x)=∣x∣−1Q^​1​(x). Then ξcoordx(v)=ω0(v,e2(x))+i ω0(e1(x),v)∈C\xi\mathrm{coord}_x(v)=\omega_0(v,e_2(x))+i\,\omega_0(e_1(x),v)\in\mathbb Cξcoordx​(v)=ω0​(v,e2​(x))+iω0​(e1​(x),v)∈C. The ξ\xiξ-projection is πξ(x,v)=v−λx(v) R(x)\pi_\xi(x,v)=v-\lambda_x(v)\,R(x)πξ​(x,v)=v−λx​(v)R(x).

π ∂s\pi\,\partial_sπ∂s​ map. With wu=proj∘uw_u=\mathrm{proj}\circ uwu​=proj∘u: π∂su(z)=ξcoordwu(z)(πξ(wu(z),∂swu(z)))∈C\pi\partial_s u(z)=\xi\mathrm{coord}_{w_u(z)}\big(\pi_\xi(w_u(z),\partial_sw_u(z))\big)\in\mathbb Cπ∂s​u(z)=ξcoordwu​(z)​(πξ​(wu​(z),∂s​wu​(z)))∈C.

windπ(u)=0\mathrm{wind}_\pi(u)=0windπ​(u)=0 (with no punctures). The set Z={z∈C:π∂su(z)=0}Z=\{z\in\mathbb C:\pi\partial_su(z)=0\}Z={z∈C:π∂s​u(z)=0} is finite, and there are integers idx(z)\mathrm{idx}(z)idx(z), z∈Zz\in Zz∈Z, such that π∂su\pi\partial_suπ∂s​u has a zero of index idx(z)\mathrm{idx}(z)idx(z) at each z∈Zz\in Zz∈Z and ∑z∈Zidx(z)=0\sum_{z\in Z}\mathrm{idx}(z)=0∑z∈Z​idx(z)=0. (This is a condition on finiteness, isolation-with-index and the index sum; it does not by itself say Z=∅Z=\varnothingZ=∅.)

Fast plane. u:C→V1u:\mathbb C\to V_1u:C→V1​ is a fast plane (for H,JH,JH,J) if: (i) uuu is a finite-energy curve on all of C\mathbb CC; (ii) there exists a prime Reeb orbit P′P'P′ such that uuu has a nondegenerate end at ∞\infty∞ asymptotic to P′P'P′ (as above, ε=1\varepsilon=1ε=1); (iii) windπ(u)=0\mathrm{wind}_\pi(u)=0windπ​(u)=0 in the sense just described.

Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Nov 4, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by Mazecto · Nov 4, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paperProve2Me Team
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me