Monotonicity of finite simple-graph edge counts
ProvedWilliamsonShmoys.edgeFinset_mono__p2m_1ec71208_cc1_45fa_ad3a_a9c7012c7f6f_a3approximation-algorithmsplanar-graphstreewidth
For two finite simple graphs on the same vertices, inclusion of the first in the second implies its edge count is no larger.
Preamble
import Mathlib set_option autoImplicit false
Formal statement
theorem WilliamsonShmoys.edgeFinset_mono__p2m_1ec71208_cc1_45fa_ad3a_a9c7012c7f6f_a3
{V : Type} [Fintype V] [LinearOrder V]
(G H : SimpleGraph V)
(hGH : G ≤ H) :
(letI : DecidableRel G.Adj := Classical.decRel G.Adj
letI : DecidableRel H.Adj := Classical.decRel H.Adj
G.edgeFinset.card ≤ H.edgeFinset.card) := by
sorrySource
David P. Williamson and David B. Shmoys, The Design of Approximation Algorithms, Cambridge University Press, 2011, author electronic manuscript, Section 10.2, proof of Theorem 10.11, pp. 270-272. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511921735. Bounded tree-width of the pieces: Robertson–Seymour (planar graphs of radius r have tree-width at most 3r+1) / Bodlaender (k-outerplanar graphs have tree-width at most 3k-1).