Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Complete Flyspeck nonlinear catalog

Open
KeplerMission.nonlinear_catalog_valid

by Minghui · Sep 27, 2026 · Mathlib c5ea003 (Lean v4.30.0)

discrete-geometrykeplersphere-packing

Every real assignment satisfying the stated domain of every member of the fixed catalog satisfies that member’s exact conclusion. The catalog contains the six source-selected families, with 580 family occurrences indexing 539 distinct source-ID records. Domains, constants, strict inequalities, disjunctions, and total function conventions are part of the concrete definition. Generic checker soundness alone does not assert this theorem.

∀p∈C, ∀x∈Dp,Fp(x).\forall p\in\mathcal C,\ \forall x\in D_p,\quad F_p(x).∀p∈C, ∀x∈Dp​,Fp​(x).

Here C is the concrete catalog, D_p its explicitly defined real domain, and F_p its exact conclusion.

Source. Hales et al., A Formal Proof of the Kepler Conjecture (2017), https://doi.org/10.1017/fmp.2017.1, §§5–6 pp.12–17; formal source general/the_main_statement.hl:55–59 (six components), nonlinear/merge_ineq.hl:78–116, local/terminal.hl:24–44, packing/YSSKQOY.hl:24–32, tame/ssreflect/tame_lemmas-compiled.hl:6–46.

Formalization note. Source-derived interface or explicitly identified analytic corollary; no proof of the target is supplied by defining its proposition.

Forensic count audit. These 539 source IDs have 498 distinct normalized syntactic bodies; repeated formulas are retained, and no claim of semantic inequivalence is made. All 539 domains have separately kernel-checked witnesses; this does not prove the inequalities.

Preamble
import Definitions.Def_Kepler_MissionContracts
set_option autoImplicit false
Formal statement
namespace KeplerMission
theorem nonlinear_catalog_valid : Nonlinear.CatalogValid := by sorry
end KeplerMission
Source
Hales et al., A Formal Proof of the Kepler Conjecture (2017), https://doi.org/10.1017/fmp.2017.1; §§5–6 pp.12–17; formal source general/the_main_statement.hl:55–59 (six components), nonlinear/merge_ineq.hl:78–116, local/terminal.hl:24–44, packing/YSSKQOY.hl:24–32, tame/ssreflect/tame_lemmas-compiled.hl:6–46; https://github.com/flyspeck/flyspeck/blob/1ce0353008eba83d3c76ae9a25c3c242e4802d53/text_formalization/general/the_main_statement.hl; https://publicationsthomashales.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/densespherepackings.pdf
Read-back

What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · gpt-6

This names, without proving, the proposition that all members of the fixed concatenated nonlinear catalog are valid: for every one of its 580 occurrences, equivalently all 539 distinct problem definitions, every real vector of that problem's stated arity satisfying all of its stated closed interval bounds satisfies its entire stated conclusion, including all disjunctive alternatives. This is unconditional catalog validity, not the existence of certificates, not acceptance by a named checker, and not validity only for geometrically realizable inputs. Empty domains make individual implications vacuous; nonempty singleton domains still impose their conclusion.

Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Sep 27, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by Minghui · Sep 27, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me