Coherent analytic two ne zero of large terminal
ProvedD1Bound5.coherent_analytic_two_ne_zero_of_large_terminaldiophantine-tuplesnumber-theory
The manuscript's actual large-terminal size hypothesis forces the two-anchor coherent form nonzero, with no nonvanishing premise.
Preamble
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.NatAntidiagonal import Mathlib.Algebra.QuadraticAlgebra.Basic import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Basic import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Equiv import Mathlib.Analysis.Analytic.Binomial import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.Basic import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.Norm import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Ring.Basic import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecificLimits.Normed import Mathlib.Data.Fin.VecNotation import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Card import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Insert import Mathlib.Data.Int.GCD import Mathlib.Data.Sym.Basic import Mathlib.Data.Sym.Card import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Dimension.Free import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Lagrange import Mathlib.NumberTheory.NumberField.InfinitePlace.TotallyRealComplex import Mathlib.NumberTheory.NumberField.Norm import Mathlib.RingTheory.Binomial import Mathlib.RingTheory.MvPolynomial.Symmetric.Defs import Mathlib.Tactic.Linarith import Mathlib.Tactic.LinearCombination import Definitions.Def_D1Bound5_CoherentIntegralForms_Definitions
Formal statement
section
open Finset
open scoped NumberField
open Module
namespace D1Bound5
theorem _root_.D1Bound5.coherent_analytic_two_ne_zero_of_large_terminal
(a b p q eta r s t : ℂ)
(ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) (hp : p ≠ 0) (hq : q ≠ 0) (hab : a ≠ b)
(heta : eta ^ 2 = p * q)
(hr : r ^ 2 = a * b + 1) (hs : s ^ 2 = a * p + 1)
(ht : t ^ 2 = b * p + 1)
(hA : 1 ≤ ‖a‖) (hB : 3 ≤ ‖b‖) (hP : 5 * ‖b‖ ≤ ‖p‖)
(hQ : 5 * ‖a‖ * ‖b‖ * ‖p‖ ≤ ‖q‖) :
coherentAnchorRoot a p q eta - coherentAnchorRoot b p q eta -
(a - b) * coherentTerminalRoot p q eta ≠ 0 := by sorry
end D1Bound5
end
Source
D1Bound5/CoherentTwoSize.lean, lines 131-146, SHA-256 8a8f6db3352296dc34c3bf72970d3d3c0c58939fc28136095cce2e2e458acdfa. Project: https://github.com/tomislav-math/d1-bound5-lean