Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Proof of Theorem 2 — zero duality gap: J^D(n,t) = inf_{μ≥0} J^D(n,t,μ) = J^D(n,t,μ*)

Proved
GVRPricing.FixedPrice.zero_duality_gap

by mikedeng1 · Oct 5, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

convex-optimizationlagrangian-dualityp2o-batch-pfp2bp2o-gran-per-chapterp2o-plan-paperp2o-v1revenue-management

Let (Λ,p,λ∗)(\Lambda,p,\lambda^*)(Λ,p,λ∗) be a regular demand function, n>0n>0n>0 a stock and t>0t>0t>0 a horizon. Then there is a multiplier μ∗≥0\mu^*\ge0μ∗≥0 such that

JD(n,t)=inf⁡μ≥0JD(n,t,μ)=JD(n,t,μ∗).J^D(n,t)=\inf_{\mu\ge0}J^D(n,t,\mu)=J^D(n,t,\mu^*).JD(n,t)=μ≥0inf​JD(n,t,μ)=JD(n,t,μ∗).

The deterministic problem (11) is a convex program with the strictly feasible null path λ≡0\lambda\equiv0λ≡0, and its Lagrangian dual has no duality gap. This is the last step of the proof of Theorem 2: combined with Lemma 1 and (15), it turns J∗(n,t)≤inf⁡μJD(n,t,μ)J^*(n,t)\le\inf_\mu J^D(n,t,\mu)J∗(n,t)≤infμ​JD(n,t,μ) into J∗(n,t)≤JD(n,t)J^*(n,t)\le J^D(n,t)J∗(n,t)≤JD(n,t).

Formalization Note The statement says that JD(n,t)J^D(n,t)JD(n,t) is the least element of {JD(n,t,μ):μ≥0}\{J^D(n,t,\mu):\mu\ge0\}{JD(n,t,μ):μ≥0}, which asserts both the equality with the infimum and its attainment.

Preamble
import Mathlib
import Definitions.Def_GVRPricing_FixedPrice_Model
import Definitions.Def_GVRPricing_FixedPrice_Deterministic

open MeasureTheory Set
Formal statement
namespace GVRPricing.FixedPrice

/-- **Zero duality gap** (§3.2.1, end of the Proof of Theorem 2, p. 1007). For a stock `n > 0` and
a horizon `t > 0` there is a multiplier `μ* ≥ 0` with
`J^D(n, t) = inf_{μ ≥ 0} J^D(n, t, μ) = J^D(n, t, μ*)`: `J^D(n, t)` is the least value of
`μ ↦ J^D(n, t, μ)` over `μ ≥ 0`, and it is attained. -/
theorem zero_duality_gap (M : Model) (n : ℕ) (t : ℝ) (hn : 0 < n) (ht : 0 < t) :
    IsLeast ((fun μ => detAugValue M n t μ) '' Ici 0) (detValue M n t) := by sorry

end GVRPricing.FixedPrice
Source
Gallego, van Ryzin, Optimal Dynamic Pricing of Inventories with Stochastic Demand over Finite Horizons, Management Science 40(8) (1994), p. 1007 (PDF 9), §3.2.1, Proof of Theorem 2, final paragraph (unnumbered)
Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Oct 5, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by mikedeng1 · Oct 5, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me