Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Definitions for On Cohomology theory for topological groups

Definition
QAlgorithms_Papers_Independent_Intakethird100_P08

by Gohan · Nov 1, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

prove2quantum

The objects the formalized statements of On Cohomology theory for topological groups (arXiv:1009.4519) are stated in. Each was checked against the paper by a blind read-back and a moderator.

  • ContinuousModule: A continuous action by additive automorphisms (PDF p. 5, Section 2). The identity and composition laws express the homomorphism explicitly: Mathlib gives AddAut A an additive group law, so A ≃+ A is not a multiplicative monoid suitable as the target of G →* (A ≃+ A).
  • IsCrossedHom: Pointwise, everywhere-defined crossed homomorphisms (PDF p. 11).
  • IsLocallyContinuousMeasurable: Borel measurability and continuity on an open identity neighborhood (PDF p. 8).
  • locallyContinuousOneCocycles: The actual locally continuous measurable one-cocycles, not their quotient (PDF p. 11).
  • continuousOneCocycles: The continuous one-cocycles, with the action retained (PDF p. 11).
  • IsLocallySplitSequence: Closed kernel embedding, open quotient, algebraic exactness, and an actual continuous local section (PDF pp. 9--10, Definition 2).
  • LocalCocycle: Normalized coordinates for a locally continuous measurable two-cocycle. All Section 4 standing hypotheses are explicit parameters (PDF pp. 12--14). Normalization is only for this representative, not for the source cochain complex.
  • ExtensionPoint: Separate carrier for the twisted extension; it does not inherit the global product topology or a topological-group instance (PDF pp. 12--14).
  • actionTwistedMul: The explicit twisted multiplication with the fixed coefficient action (PDF p. 14). Renew46.P18.twistedMul has trivial action and cannot replace this operation for a general continuous G-module.
  • twistedInv: The corrected inverse (PDF p. 14). Printed: second coordinate e_G and an inconsistent variable s. Changed to g^-1 and -g^-1.(a+F(g,g^-1)), forced by multiplication; even F=0,a=0 contradicts the printed second coordinate.
  • identityPoint: Identity in normalized twisted coordinates (PDF pp. 12--14).
  • kernelInclusion: Kernel inclusion (PDF p. 13).
  • quotientProjection: Quotient projection (PDF p. 13).
  • extensionCoordinates: Underlying coordinate bijection, used only for the product sigma algebra in Proposition 4(v), not for a global product topology (PDF p. 14).
  • translatedRectangles: All left translates of the local rectangular neighborhood base, exactly as in Sections 4.1--4.2 (PDF pp. 12--13).
  • innerConjugation: Inner conjugation in the explicit algebraic coordinates (PDF p. 13).
  • IsNonnegativeTest: Real nonnegative continuous functions of compact support (PDF p. 14). Compact support is the closure of the nonzero locus.
  • leftTranslate: The source translation convention f_x(s)=f(xs) (PDF p. 14).
  • coverCosts: Costs of all finite domination covers, allowing nonnegative coefficients as in Definition 4 (PDF p. 14). The empty cover is allowed.
  • approximateIntegral: Approximate integral (f;g), on the nonnegative cone only (Definition 4, PDF p. 14). Theorems require a nonzero denominator test. Outside that domain sInf is Lean's total operation; its default value has no analytic meaning.
  • normalizedIntegral: I_phi(f)=(f;phi)/(g;phi), with g fixed (Definition 5, PDF p. 14). All uses below require both g and phi to be nonzero nonnegative test functions.
  • IsPositiveInvariantIntegral: A nonzero positive real linear integral on C_c(E), invariant under every source left translation (PDF pp. 14, 17). The translated test is required to exist, so the invariance condition cannot hold vacuously.
  • IsLeftInvariantMeasure: The left-invariant locally finite Borel measure properties explicitly used in Remark 4 (PDF p. 17). No product-Haar assertion is included.
  • IsLocalSteinhausSet: Every hypothesis of Proposition 6 (PDF p. 18), including symmetry, relative compactness, both closure factors, identity membership and finite positive mass. Measures take values in ENNReal.
  • localConvolution: The actual local convolution mass (PDF p. 19). On the Proposition 6 domain, every mass is finite before conversion to a real number.
Definition code
import Mathlib

/-!
Statements from Khedekar--Rajan, arXiv:1009.4519v1.
The local definitions below are specific to this paper. In particular, the topology
on the twisted extension is constructed from translated rectangles; continuity of
its group operations is never a hypothesis. See HARD.md for deferred nodes.
-/

namespace QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P08

open Set MeasureTheory
open scoped BigOperators Topology CompactlySupported

/-- A continuous action by additive automorphisms (PDF p. 5, Section 2).
The identity and composition laws express the homomorphism explicitly:
Mathlib gives AddAut A an additive group law, so A ≃+ A is not a
multiplicative monoid suitable as the target of G →* (A ≃+ A). -/
structure ContinuousModule (G A : Type*) [Group G] [TopologicalSpace G]
    [IsTopologicalGroup G] [AddCommGroup A] [TopologicalSpace A]
    [IsTopologicalAddGroup A] where
  action : G → (A ≃+ A)
  action_one : action 1 = AddEquiv.refl A
  action_mul : ∀ g h, action (g * h) = (action h).trans (action g)
  continuous_action : Continuous (fun p : G × A => action p.1 p.2)

section DegreeOne

variable {G A : Type*} [Group G] [TopologicalSpace G] [IsTopologicalGroup G]
  [AddCommGroup A] [TopologicalSpace A] [IsTopologicalAddGroup A]
  [MeasurableSpace G] [BorelSpace G] [MeasurableSpace A] [BorelSpace A]

/-- Pointwise, everywhere-defined crossed homomorphisms (PDF p. 11). -/
def IsCrossedHom (rho : ContinuousModule G A) (c : G → A) : Prop :=
  ∀ s t, c (s * t) = c s + rho.action s (c t)

/-- Borel measurability and continuity on an open identity neighborhood (PDF p. 8). -/
def IsLocallyContinuousMeasurable (c : G → A) : Prop :=
  Measurable c ∧ ∃ U : Set G, IsOpen U ∧ 1 ∈ U ∧ ContinuousOn c U

/-- The actual locally continuous measurable one-cocycles, not their quotient (PDF p. 11). -/
def locallyContinuousOneCocycles (rho : ContinuousModule G A) : Set (G → A) :=
  {c | IsLocallyContinuousMeasurable c ∧ IsCrossedHom rho c}

/-- The continuous one-cocycles, with the action retained (PDF p. 11). -/
def continuousOneCocycles (rho : ContinuousModule G A) : Set (G → A) :=
  {c | Continuous c ∧ IsCrossedHom rho c}

example (rho : ContinuousModule G A) : IsCrossedHom rho (fun _ => 0) := by
  intro s t
  simp

example (rho : ContinuousModule G A) :
    (fun _ => 0) ∈ continuousOneCocycles rho := by
  exact ⟨continuous_const, by intro s t; simp⟩

end DegreeOne

section Sections

variable {K E Q : Type*} [Group K] [Group E] [Group Q]
  [TopologicalSpace K] [TopologicalSpace E] [TopologicalSpace Q]
  [IsTopologicalGroup K] [IsTopologicalGroup E] [IsTopologicalGroup Q]

/-- Closed kernel embedding, open quotient, algebraic exactness, and an actual
continuous local section (PDF pp. 9--10, Definition 2). -/
def IsLocallySplitSequence (i : K →* E) (p : E →* Q) : Prop :=
  Continuous i ∧ Continuous p ∧ Topology.IsClosedEmbedding i ∧ IsOpenMap p ∧
  Function.Surjective p ∧ Set.range i = {x | p x = 1} ∧
  ∃ U : Set Q, IsOpen U ∧ 1 ∈ U ∧
    ∃ sigma : U → E, Continuous sigma ∧ ∀ u, p (sigma u) = u.val

example (i : K →* E) (p : E →* Q) (h : IsLocallySplitSequence i p) :
    Function.Surjective p := h.2.2.2.2.1

end Sections

/-- Normalized coordinates for a locally continuous measurable two-cocycle.
All Section 4 standing hypotheses are explicit parameters (PDF pp. 12--14).
Normalization is only for this representative, not for the source cochain complex. -/
structure LocalCocycle (G A : Type*) [Group G] [TopologicalSpace G]
    [IsTopologicalGroup G] [T2Space G] [LocallyCompactSpace G]
    [SecondCountableTopology G] [MeasurableSpace G] [BorelSpace G]
    [AddCommGroup A] [TopologicalSpace A] [IsTopologicalAddGroup A]
    [T2Space A] [LocallyCompactSpace A] [SecondCountableTopology A]
    [MeasurableSpace A] [BorelSpace A] where
  coefficients : ContinuousModule G A
  cocycle : G × G → A
  measurable_cocycle : Measurable cocycle
  cocycle_identity : ∀ g h k,
    coefficients.action g (cocycle (h, k)) + cocycle (g, h * k) =
      cocycle (g, h) + cocycle (g * h, k)
  normalized_left : ∀ g, cocycle (1, g) = 0
  normalized_right : ∀ g, cocycle (g, 1) = 0
  identityNeighborhood : Set G
  isOpen_identityNeighborhood : IsOpen identityNeighborhood
  one_mem_identityNeighborhood : 1 ∈ identityNeighborhood
  continuous_cocycle :
    ContinuousOn cocycle (identityNeighborhood ×ˢ identityNeighborhood)

section ConstructedExtension

variable {G A : Type*} [Group G] [TopologicalSpace G] [IsTopologicalGroup G]
  [T2Space G] [LocallyCompactSpace G] [SecondCountableTopology G]
  [MeasurableSpace G] [BorelSpace G]
  [AddCommGroup A] [TopologicalSpace A] [IsTopologicalAddGroup A]
  [T2Space A] [LocallyCompactSpace A] [SecondCountableTopology A]
  [MeasurableSpace A] [BorelSpace A]

/-- Sanity: the zero representative supplies a genuine instance for every
continuous coefficient action; the LocalCocycle hypotheses are nonvacuous. -/
example (rho : ContinuousModule G A) : Nonempty (LocalCocycle G A) := by
  refine ⟨{
    coefficients := rho
    cocycle := fun _ => 0
    measurable_cocycle := measurable_const
    cocycle_identity := ?_
    normalized_left := ?_
    normalized_right := ?_
    identityNeighborhood := Set.univ
    isOpen_identityNeighborhood := isOpen_univ
    one_mem_identityNeighborhood := Set.mem_univ 1
    continuous_cocycle := continuousOn_const }⟩
  · intro g h k
    simp
  · intro g
    rfl
  · intro g
    rfl

/-- Separate carrier for the twisted extension; it does not inherit the global
product topology or a topological-group instance (PDF pp. 12--14). -/
structure ExtensionPoint (D : LocalCocycle G A) where
  coefficient : A
  base : G

/-- The explicit twisted multiplication with the fixed coefficient action
(PDF p. 14). Renew46.P18.twistedMul has trivial action and cannot replace this
operation for a general continuous G-module. -/
def actionTwistedMul (D : LocalCocycle G A) (x y : ExtensionPoint D) : ExtensionPoint D :=
  ⟨x.coefficient + D.coefficients.action x.base y.coefficient +
    D.cocycle (x.base, y.base), x.base * y.base⟩

/-- The corrected inverse (PDF p. 14). Printed: second coordinate e_G and an
inconsistent variable s. Changed to g^-1 and -g^-1.(a+F(g,g^-1)), forced by
multiplication; even F=0,a=0 contradicts the printed second coordinate. -/
def twistedInv (D : LocalCocycle G A) (x : ExtensionPoint D) : ExtensionPoint D :=
  ⟨D.coefficients.action (x.base⁻¹)
    (-(x.coefficient + D.cocycle (x.base, x.base⁻¹))), x.base⁻¹⟩

/-- Identity in normalized twisted coordinates (PDF pp. 12--14). -/
def identityPoint (D : LocalCocycle G A) : ExtensionPoint D := ⟨0, 1⟩

/-- Kernel inclusion (PDF p. 13). -/
def kernelInclusion (D : LocalCocycle G A) (a : A) : ExtensionPoint D := ⟨a, 1⟩

/-- Quotient projection (PDF p. 13). -/
def quotientProjection (D : LocalCocycle G A) (x : ExtensionPoint D) : G := x.base

/-- Underlying coordinate bijection, used only for the product sigma algebra
in Proposition 4(v), not for a global product topology (PDF p. 14). -/
def extensionCoordinates (D : LocalCocycle G A) (x : ExtensionPoint D) : A × G :=
  (x.coefficient, x.base)

/-- All left translates of the local rectangular neighborhood base, exactly
as in Sections 4.1--4.2 (PDF pp. 12--13). -/
def translatedRectangles (D : LocalCocycle G A) : Set (Set (ExtensionPoint D)) :=
  {V | ∃ (x : ExtensionPoint D) (UA : Set A) (UG : Set G),
    IsOpen UA ∧ 0 ∈ UA ∧ IsOpen UG ∧ 1 ∈ UG ∧
    ContinuousOn D.cocycle (UG ×ˢ UG) ∧
    V = (actionTwistedMul D x) '' {y | y.coefficient ∈ UA ∧ y.base ∈ UG}}

/-- The source's topology generated by its translated local rectangles (PDF p. 13). -/
instance extensionTopology (D : LocalCocycle G A) : TopologicalSpace (ExtensionPoint D) :=
  TopologicalSpace.generateFrom (translatedRectangles D)

/-- Borel sigma algebra for the constructed topology (PDF p. 13). -/
instance extensionMeasurableSpace (D : LocalCocycle G A) :
    MeasurableSpace (ExtensionPoint D) := borel (ExtensionPoint D)

instance extensionBorelSpace (D : LocalCocycle G A) : BorelSpace (ExtensionPoint D) :=
  ⟨rfl⟩

/-- Inner conjugation in the explicit algebraic coordinates (PDF p. 13). -/
def innerConjugation (D : LocalCocycle G A) (x y : ExtensionPoint D) : ExtensionPoint D :=
  actionTwistedMul D (actionTwistedMul D x y) (twistedInv D x)

example (D : LocalCocycle G A) : D.cocycle (1, 1) = 0 := D.normalized_left 1

example (D : LocalCocycle G A) (x y : ExtensionPoint D) :
    (actionTwistedMul D x y).base = x.base * y.base := rfl

example (D : LocalCocycle G A) (x : ExtensionPoint D) :
    (twistedInv D x).base = x.base⁻¹ := rfl

example (D : LocalCocycle G A) (a : A) :
    quotientProjection D (kernelInclusion D a) = 1 := rfl

example (D : LocalCocycle G A) (x : ExtensionPoint D) :
    actionTwistedMul D (identityPoint D) x = x := by
  cases x
  simp [actionTwistedMul, identityPoint, D.normalized_left, D.coefficients.action_one]

/-- Real nonnegative continuous functions of compact support (PDF p. 14).
Compact support is the closure of the nonzero locus. -/
def IsNonnegativeTest (D : LocalCocycle G A) (f : ExtensionPoint D → ℝ) : Prop :=
  Continuous f ∧ HasCompactSupport f ∧ ∀ x, 0 ≤ f x

example (D : LocalCocycle G A) : IsNonnegativeTest D (fun _ => 0) := by
  refine ⟨continuous_const, ?_, fun _ => le_rfl⟩
  simp [HasCompactSupport]

/-- The source translation convention f_x(s)=f(xs) (PDF p. 14). -/
def leftTranslate (D : LocalCocycle G A) (f : ExtensionPoint D → ℝ)
    (x : ExtensionPoint D) : ExtensionPoint D → ℝ := fun s => f (actionTwistedMul D x s)

/-- Costs of all finite domination covers, allowing nonnegative coefficients
as in Definition 4 (PDF p. 14). The empty cover is allowed. -/
def coverCosts (D : LocalCocycle G A) (f g : ExtensionPoint D → ℝ) : Set ℝ :=
  {r | ∃ (n : ℕ) (c : Fin n → ℝ) (u : Fin n → ExtensionPoint D),
    (∀ j, 0 ≤ c j) ∧
    (∀ s, f s ≤ ∑ j, c j * g (actionTwistedMul D (u j) s)) ∧ r = ∑ j, c j}

/-- Approximate integral (f;g), on the nonnegative cone only (Definition 4,
PDF p. 14). Theorems require a nonzero denominator test. Outside that domain
sInf is Lean's total operation; its default value has no analytic meaning. -/
noncomputable def approximateIntegral (D : LocalCocycle G A)
    (f g : ExtensionPoint D → ℝ) : ℝ := sInf (coverCosts D f g)

/-- I_phi(f)=(f;phi)/(g;phi), with g fixed (Definition 5, PDF p. 14).
All uses below require both g and phi to be nonzero nonnegative test functions. -/
noncomputable def normalizedIntegral (D : LocalCocycle G A)
    (g phi f : ExtensionPoint D → ℝ) : ℝ :=
  approximateIntegral D f phi / approximateIntegral D g phi

example (D : LocalCocycle G A) (f : ExtensionPoint D → ℝ) (x s : ExtensionPoint D) :
    leftTranslate D f x s = f (actionTwistedMul D x s) := rfl

example (D : LocalCocycle G A) (g : ExtensionPoint D → ℝ) :
    0 ∈ coverCosts D (fun _ => 0) g := by
  refine ⟨0, (fun j => Fin.elim0 j), (fun j => Fin.elim0 j), ?_, ?_, ?_⟩
  · intro j
    exact Fin.elim0 j
  · intro s
    simp
  · simp

example (D : LocalCocycle G A) (g phi f : ExtensionPoint D → ℝ) :
    normalizedIntegral D g phi f =
      approximateIntegral D f phi / approximateIntegral D g phi := rfl

/-- A nonzero positive real linear integral on C_c(E), invariant under every
source left translation (PDF pp. 14, 17). The translated test is required to
exist, so the invariance condition cannot hold vacuously. -/
def IsPositiveInvariantIntegral (D : LocalCocycle G A)
    (I : C_c(ExtensionPoint D, ℝ) →ₗ[ℝ] ℝ) : Prop :=
  I ≠ 0 ∧
  (∀ f : C_c(ExtensionPoint D, ℝ), (∀ s, 0 ≤ f s) → 0 ≤ I f) ∧
  ∀ (f : C_c(ExtensionPoint D, ℝ)) (x : ExtensionPoint D),
    ∃ fx : C_c(ExtensionPoint D, ℝ),
      (∀ s, fx s = f (actionTwistedMul D x s)) ∧ I fx = I f

/-- The left-invariant locally finite Borel measure properties explicitly
used in Remark 4 (PDF p. 17). No product-Haar assertion is included. -/
def IsLeftInvariantMeasure (D : LocalCocycle G A)
    (mu : Measure (ExtensionPoint D)) : Prop :=
  mu ≠ 0 ∧
  (∀ (x : ExtensionPoint D) (W : Set (ExtensionPoint D)),
    MeasurableSet W → IsCompact (closure W) →
      mu ((actionTwistedMul D x) '' W) = mu W) ∧
  ∀ K : Set (ExtensionPoint D), IsCompact K → mu K < ⊤

example (D : LocalCocycle G A) :
    ¬ IsPositiveInvariantIntegral D (0 : C_c(ExtensionPoint D, ℝ) →ₗ[ℝ] ℝ) := by
  intro h
  exact h.1 rfl

example (D : LocalCocycle G A) :
    ¬ IsLeftInvariantMeasure D (0 : Measure (ExtensionPoint D)) := by
  intro h
  exact h.1 rfl

/-- Every hypothesis of Proposition 6 (PDF p. 18), including symmetry,
relative compactness, both closure factors, identity membership and finite
positive mass. Measures take values in ENNReal. -/
def IsLocalSteinhausSet (D : LocalCocycle G A) (mu : Measure (ExtensionPoint D))
    (U : Set G) (M : Set (ExtensionPoint D)) : Prop :=
  MeasurableSet M ∧
  (∀ x : ExtensionPoint D, x ∈ M ↔ twistedInv D x ∈ M) ∧
  M ⊆ (quotientProjection D) ⁻¹' U ∧
  IsOpen U ∧ 1 ∈ U ∧ (∀ g : G, g ∈ U ↔ g⁻¹ ∈ U) ∧
  IsCompact (closure U) ∧
  (∀ g ∈ closure U, ∀ h ∈ closure U, g * h ∈ D.identityNeighborhood) ∧
  identityPoint D ∈ M ∧ 0 < mu M ∧ mu M < ⊤

example (D : LocalCocycle G A) (mu : Measure (ExtensionPoint D)) (U : Set G) :
    ¬ IsLocalSteinhausSet D mu U ∅ := by
  intro h
  exact h.2.2.2.2.2.2.2.2.1

/-- The actual local convolution mass (PDF p. 19). On the Proposition 6
domain, every mass is finite before conversion to a real number. -/
noncomputable def localConvolution (D : LocalCocycle G A)
    (mu : Measure (ExtensionPoint D)) (M : Set (ExtensionPoint D))
    (x : ExtensionPoint D) : ℝ := (mu (M ∩ (actionTwistedMul D x) '' M)).toReal

example (D : LocalCocycle G A) (mu : Measure (ExtensionPoint D))
    (M : Set (ExtensionPoint D)) (x : ExtensionPoint D) :
    localConvolution D mu M x = (mu (M ∩ (actionTwistedMul D x) '' M)).toReal := rfl

end ConstructedExtension

end QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P08
Source
On Cohomology theory for topological groups, arXiv:1009.4519v1, https://arxiv.org/abs/1009.4519v1
Read-back

What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · gpt-6.1-sol

QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P08.ContinuousModule

For a topological group GGG and a topological abelian group AAA, a continuous module structure consists of an additive automorphism αg:A→A\alpha_g:A\to Aαg​:A→A for each g∈Gg\in Gg∈G, such that α1=id⁡A\alpha_1=\operatorname{id}_Aα1​=idA​, αgh=αg∘αh\alpha_{gh}=\alpha_g\circ\alpha_hαgh​=αg​∘αh​ for every g,h∈Gg,h\in Gg,h∈G, and the map G×A→AG\times A\to AG×A→A given by (g,a)↦αg(a)(g,a)\mapsto\alpha_g(a)(g,a)↦αg​(a) is continuous.

QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P08.ExtensionPoint

Let GGG be a Hausdorff, locally compact, second-countable topological group and AAA a Hausdorff, locally compact, second-countable topological abelian group, both with their Borel σ\sigmaσ-algebras. Fix data DDD consisting of additive automorphisms αg\alpha_gαg​ of AAA with α1=id⁡A\alpha_1=\operatorname{id}_Aα1​=idA​, αgh=αg∘αh\alpha_{gh}=\alpha_g\circ\alpha_hαgh​=αg​∘αh​, and continuous map (g,a)↦αg(a)(g,a)\mapsto\alpha_g(a)(g,a)↦αg​(a); a measurable function β:G×G→A\beta:G\times G\to Aβ:G×G→A satisfying αg(β(h,k))+β(g,hk)=β(g,h)+β(gh,k)\alpha_g(\beta(h,k))+\beta(g,hk)=\beta(g,h)+\beta(gh,k)αg​(β(h,k))+β(g,hk)=β(g,h)+β(gh,k) for all g,h,k∈Gg,h,k\in Gg,h,k∈G, and β(1,g)=β(g,1)=0\beta(1,g)=\beta(g,1)=0β(1,g)=β(g,1)=0 for all g∈Gg\in Gg∈G; and a specified open neighborhood NNN of 111 on whose square β\betaβ is continuous. An extension point for DDD consists of exactly two coordinates: an arbitrary coefficient a∈Aa\in Aa∈A and an arbitrary base element g∈Gg\in Gg∈G.

QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P08.IsCrossedHom

Let GGG be a topological group, let AAA be a topological abelian group, and let ρ\rhoρ specify additive automorphisms αg\alpha_gαg​ of AAA satisfying α1=id⁡A\alpha_1=\operatorname{id}_Aα1​=idA​ and αgh=αg∘αh\alpha_{gh}=\alpha_g\circ\alpha_hαgh​=αg​∘αh​, with (g,a)↦αg(a)(g,a)\mapsto\alpha_g(a)(g,a)↦αg​(a) continuous. For an arbitrary function c:G→Ac:G\to Ac:G→A, the predicate says that, for every s,t∈Gs,t\in Gs,t∈G,

c(st)=c(s)+αs(c(t)).c(st)=c(s)+\alpha_s(c(t)).c(st)=c(s)+αs​(c(t)).

It imposes no continuity or measurability condition on ccc.

QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P08.IsLeftInvariantMeasure

Let GGG be a Hausdorff, locally compact, second countable topological group, and let AAA be a Hausdorff, locally compact, second countable additive abelian topological group, both with their Borel measurable structures. Let DDD consist of additive automorphisms αp\alpha_pαp​ with α1=id\alpha_1=\mathrm{id}α1​=id, αpq=αp∘αq\alpha_{pq}=\alpha_p\circ\alpha_qαpq​=αp​∘αq​, and jointly continuous evaluation; a measurable function κ:G×G→A\kappa:G\times G\to Aκ:G×G→A satisfying αp(κ(q,r))+κ(p,qr)=κ(p,q)+κ(pq,r)\alpha_p(\kappa(q,r))+\kappa(p,qr)=\kappa(p,q)+\kappa(pq,r)αp​(κ(q,r))+κ(p,qr)=κ(p,q)+κ(pq,r) and κ(1,p)=κ(p,1)=0\kappa(1,p)=\kappa(p,1)=0κ(1,p)=κ(p,1)=0; and an open neighborhood U0U_0U0​ of 111 on whose square κ\kappaκ is continuous. Put E=A×GE=A\times GE=A×G, define (a,p)⋆(b,q)=(a+αp(b)+κ(p,q),pq)(a,p)\star(b,q)=(a+\alpha_p(b)+\kappa(p,q),pq)(a,p)⋆(b,q)=(a+αp​(b)+κ(p,q),pq), and equip EEE with the topology generated by x⋆(UA×UG)x\star(U_A\times U_G)x⋆(UA​×UG​), where x∈Ex\in Ex∈E, UAU_AUA​ is open and contains 000, UGU_GUG​ is open and contains 111, and κ\kappaκ is continuous on UG2U_G^2UG2​. Equip EEE with the Borel measurable structure of this topology. For a measure μ\muμ on EEE, this predicate means that μ\muμ is not the zero measure; that for every x∈Ex\in Ex∈E and every measurable set W⊆EW\subseteq EW⊆E whose closure is compact,

μ({x⋆w:w∈W})=μ(W);\mu\bigl(\{x\star w:w\in W\}\bigr)=\mu(W);μ({x⋆w:w∈W})=μ(W);

and that μ(K)<+∞\mu(K)<+\inftyμ(K)<+∞ for every compact set K⊆EK\subseteq EK⊆E. The invariance condition is quantified over measurable sets with compact closure, and the compact-set finiteness condition has no separate measurability hypothesis on KKK. Empty sets are included in both quantifications.

QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P08.IsLocalSteinhausSet

Let GGG be a Hausdorff, locally compact, second countable topological group, and let AAA be a Hausdorff, locally compact, second countable topological abelian group, both equipped with their Borel measurable structures. Let DDD specify additive automorphisms ρg\rho_gρg​ of AAA with ρ1=id\rho_1=\mathrm{id}ρ1​=id, ρgh=ρg∘ρh\rho_{gh}=\rho_g\circ\rho_hρgh​=ρg​∘ρh​, and jointly continuous (g,a)↦ρg(a)(g,a)\mapsto\rho_g(a)(g,a)↦ρg​(a); a measurable function c:G×G→Ac:G\times G\to Ac:G×G→A satisfying ρg(c(h,k))+c(g,hk)=c(g,h)+c(gh,k)\rho_g(c(h,k))+c(g,hk)=c(g,h)+c(gh,k)ρg​(c(h,k))+c(g,hk)=c(g,h)+c(gh,k) and c(1,g)=c(g,1)=0c(1,g)=c(g,1)=0c(1,g)=c(g,1)=0; and a specified open neighborhood NNN of 111 on whose square ccc is continuous. Put E=A×GE=A\times GE=A×G, define (a,g)⋆(b,h)=(a+ρg(b)+c(g,h),gh)(a,g)\star(b,h)=(a+\rho_g(b)+c(g,h),gh)(a,g)⋆(b,h)=(a+ρg​(b)+c(g,h),gh) and (a,g)†=(ρg−1(−(a+c(g,g−1))),g−1)(a,g)^\dagger=(\rho_{g^{-1}}(-(a+c(g,g^{-1}))),g^{-1})(a,g)†=(ρg−1​(−(a+c(g,g−1))),g−1), and equip EEE with the topology generated by all sets {x⋆(a,g):a∈P, g∈Q}\{x\star(a,g):a\in P,\ g\in Q\}{x⋆(a,g):a∈P, g∈Q}, where x∈Ex\in Ex∈E, PPP is an open neighborhood of 000 in AAA, QQQ is an open neighborhood of 111 in GGG, and ccc is continuous on Q×QQ\times QQ×Q; use the Borel measurable structure of this topology. For any measure μ\muμ on EEE, any U⊆GU\subseteq GU⊆G, and any M⊆EM\subseteq EM⊆E, the property defined here holds exactly when all the following conditions hold: MMM is measurable; for every x∈Ex\in Ex∈E, x∈Mx\in Mx∈M if and only if x†∈Mx^\dagger\in Mx†∈M; every (a,g)∈M(a,g)\in M(a,g)∈M has g∈Ug\in Ug∈U; UUU is open and contains 111; for every g∈Gg\in Gg∈G, g∈Ug\in Ug∈U if and only if g−1∈Ug^{-1}\in Ug−1∈U; U‾\overline UU is compact; gh∈Ngh\in Ngh∈N for every g,h∈U‾g,h\in\overline Ug,h∈U; (0,1)∈M(0,1)\in M(0,1)∈M; and 0<μ(M)<∞0<\mu(M)<\infty0<μ(M)<∞. Thus the property excludes empty or measure-zero MMM; it imposes no separate invariance assumption on μ\muμ.

QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P08.IsLocallyContinuousMeasurable

For a function c:G→Ac:G\to Ac:G→A, with the given topologies and measurable structures on GGG and AAA and identity element 1∈G1\in G1∈G, the predicate says that ccc is measurable and that there exists an open set U⊆GU\subseteq GU⊆G containing 111 such that the restriction c∣Uc|_Uc∣U​ is continuous. In particular, the witnessing set UUU cannot be empty.

QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P08.IsLocallySplitSequence

For identity-preserving multiplicative homomorphisms i:K→Ei:K\to Ei:K→E and p:E→Qp:E\to Qp:E→Q, with the given topologies on these spaces, the predicate says that iii and ppp are continuous; iii is a closed embedding, meaning that it identifies KKK homeomorphically with a closed subset of EEE; ppp sends open sets to open sets and is surjective; and

i(K)={x∈E:p(x)=1}.i(K)=\{x\in E:p(x)=1\}.i(K)={x∈E:p(x)=1}.

It also requires an open set U⊆QU\subseteq QU⊆Q containing 111 and a continuous map σ:U→E\sigma:U\to Eσ:U→E, where UUU has its subspace topology, such that p(σ(u))=up(\sigma(u))=up(σ(u))=u for every u∈Uu\in Uu∈U.

QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P08.IsNonnegativeTest

Let GGG be a Hausdorff, locally compact, second countable topological group, and let AAA be a Hausdorff, locally compact, second countable additive abelian topological group, both equipped with their Borel measurable structures. The datum DDD consists of additive automorphisms αp:A→A\alpha_p:A\to Aαp​:A→A, with α1=id\alpha_1=\mathrm{id}α1​=id, αpq=αp∘αq\alpha_{pq}=\alpha_p\circ\alpha_qαpq​=αp​∘αq​, and jointly continuous evaluation (p,a)↦αp(a)(p,a)\mapsto\alpha_p(a)(p,a)↦αp​(a); a measurable function κ:G×G→A\kappa:G\times G\to Aκ:G×G→A satisfying αp(κ(q,r))+κ(p,qr)=κ(p,q)+κ(pq,r)\alpha_p(\kappa(q,r))+\kappa(p,qr)=\kappa(p,q)+\kappa(pq,r)αp​(κ(q,r))+κ(p,qr)=κ(p,q)+κ(pq,r) and κ(1,p)=κ(p,1)=0\kappa(1,p)=\kappa(p,1)=0κ(1,p)=κ(p,1)=0; and an open set U0U_0U0​ containing 111 such that κ\kappaκ is continuous on U0×U0U_0\times U_0U0​×U0​. Write E=A×GE=A\times GE=A×G and define (a,p)⋆(b,q)=(a+αp(b)+κ(p,q),pq)(a,p)\star(b,q)=(a+\alpha_p(b)+\kappa(p,q),pq)(a,p)⋆(b,q)=(a+αp​(b)+κ(p,q),pq). Equip EEE with the topology generated by the sets x⋆(UA×UG)x\star(U_A\times U_G)x⋆(UA​×UG​), where x∈Ex\in Ex∈E, UA⊆AU_A\subseteq AUA​⊆A is open and contains 000, UG⊆GU_G\subseteq GUG​⊆G is open and contains 111, and κ\kappaκ is continuous on UG×UGU_G\times U_GUG​×UG​. For any function f:E→Rf:E\to\mathbb Rf:E→R, the predicate in this declaration means that fff is continuous, the closure of {s∈E:f(s)≠0}\{s\in E:f(s)\ne0\}{s∈E:f(s)=0} is compact, and f(s)≥0f(s)\ge0f(s)≥0 for every s∈Es\in Es∈E. The zero function is included.

QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P08.IsPositiveInvariantIntegral

Let GGG be a Hausdorff, locally compact, second countable topological group, and let AAA be a Hausdorff, locally compact, second countable additive abelian topological group, both with their Borel measurable structures. Let DDD specify additive automorphisms αp\alpha_pαp​, with α1=id\alpha_1=\mathrm{id}α1​=id, αpq=αp∘αq\alpha_{pq}=\alpha_p\circ\alpha_qαpq​=αp​∘αq​, and jointly continuous evaluation; a measurable function κ:G×G→A\kappa:G\times G\to Aκ:G×G→A satisfying αp(κ(q,r))+κ(p,qr)=κ(p,q)+κ(pq,r)\alpha_p(\kappa(q,r))+\kappa(p,qr)=\kappa(p,q)+\kappa(pq,r)αp​(κ(q,r))+κ(p,qr)=κ(p,q)+κ(pq,r) and κ(1,p)=κ(p,1)=0\kappa(1,p)=\kappa(p,1)=0κ(1,p)=κ(p,1)=0; and an open neighborhood U0U_0U0​ of 111 such that κ\kappaκ is continuous on U02U_0^2U02​. Put E=A×GE=A\times GE=A×G, define (a,p)⋆(b,q)=(a+αp(b)+κ(p,q),pq)(a,p)\star(b,q)=(a+\alpha_p(b)+\kappa(p,q),pq)(a,p)⋆(b,q)=(a+αp​(b)+κ(p,q),pq), and give EEE the topology generated by x⋆(UA×UG)x\star(U_A\times U_G)x⋆(UA​×UG​) for x∈Ex\in Ex∈E, open UA∋0U_A\ni0UA​∋0, and open UG∋1U_G\ni1UG​∋1 such that κ\kappaκ is continuous on UG2U_G^2UG2​. Let Cc(E,R)C_c(E,\mathbb R)Cc​(E,R) denote the real vector space of continuous real functions whose nonzero sets have compact closures. For a real-linear map I:Cc(E,R)→RI:C_c(E,\mathbb R)\to\mathbb RI:Cc​(E,R)→R, this predicate means that III is not the zero map; that I(f)≥0I(f)\ge0I(f)≥0 whenever f(s)≥0f(s)\ge0f(s)≥0 for every s∈Es\in Es∈E; and that for every f∈Cc(E,R)f\in C_c(E,\mathbb R)f∈Cc​(E,R) and every x∈Ex\in Ex∈E, there exists fx∈Cc(E,R)f_x\in C_c(E,\mathbb R)fx​∈Cc​(E,R) such that fx(s)=f(x⋆s)f_x(s)=f(x\star s)fx​(s)=f(x⋆s) for every s∈Es\in Es∈E and I(fx)=I(f)I(f_x)=I(f)I(fx​)=I(f).

QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P08.LocalCocycle

Let GGG be a Hausdorff, locally compact, second-countable topological group and AAA a Hausdorff, locally compact, second-countable topological abelian group, each equipped with its Borel σ\sigmaσ-algebra. A local cocycle consists of additive automorphisms αg:A→A\alpha_g:A\to Aαg​:A→A satisfying α1=id⁡A\alpha_1=\operatorname{id}_Aα1​=idA​ and αgh=αg∘αh\alpha_{gh}=\alpha_g\circ\alpha_hαgh​=αg​∘αh​, with (g,a)↦αg(a)(g,a)\mapsto\alpha_g(a)(g,a)↦αg​(a) continuous; a measurable function β:G×G→A\beta:G\times G\to Aβ:G×G→A satisfying, for every g,h,k∈Gg,h,k\in Gg,h,k∈G,

αg(β(h,k))+β(g,hk)=β(g,h)+β(gh,k);\alpha_g(\beta(h,k))+\beta(g,hk)=\beta(g,h)+\beta(gh,k);αg​(β(h,k))+β(g,hk)=β(g,h)+β(gh,k);

the identities β(1,g)=0\beta(1,g)=0β(1,g)=0 and β(g,1)=0\beta(g,1)=0β(g,1)=0 for every g∈Gg\in Gg∈G; and a specified open set N⊆GN\subseteq GN⊆G containing 111 such that β\betaβ is continuous on N×NN\times NN×N.

QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P08.actionTwistedMul

Let GGG be a Hausdorff, locally compact, second-countable topological group and AAA a Hausdorff, locally compact, second-countable topological abelian group, both with their Borel σ\sigmaσ-algebras. Fix data DDD consisting of additive automorphisms αg\alpha_gαg​ of AAA satisfying α1=id⁡A\alpha_1=\operatorname{id}_Aα1​=idA​ and αgh=αg∘αh\alpha_{gh}=\alpha_g\circ\alpha_hαgh​=αg​∘αh​, with (g,a)↦αg(a)(g,a)\mapsto\alpha_g(a)(g,a)↦αg​(a) continuous; a measurable function β:G×G→A\beta:G\times G\to Aβ:G×G→A satisfying αg(β(h,k))+β(g,hk)=β(g,h)+β(gh,k)\alpha_g(\beta(h,k))+\beta(g,hk)=\beta(g,h)+\beta(gh,k)αg​(β(h,k))+β(g,hk)=β(g,h)+β(gh,k) for all g,h,k∈Gg,h,k\in Gg,h,k∈G and β(1,g)=β(g,1)=0\beta(1,g)=\beta(g,1)=0β(1,g)=β(g,1)=0 for all g∈Gg\in Gg∈G; and a specified open neighborhood NNN of 111 on whose square β\betaβ is continuous. For any extension points x=(a,g)x=(a,g)x=(a,g) and y=(b,h)y=(b,h)y=(b,h), where a,b∈Aa,b\in Aa,b∈A and g,h∈Gg,h\in Gg,h∈G are arbitrary, the defined operation returns the extension point

x⋆y=(a+αg(b)+β(g,h),  gh).x\star y=\bigl(a+\alpha_g(b)+\beta(g,h),\;gh\bigr).x⋆y=(a+αg​(b)+β(g,h),gh).

QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P08.approximateIntegral

Let GGG be a Hausdorff, locally compact, second countable topological group, and let AAA be a Hausdorff, locally compact, second countable additive abelian topological group, both with their Borel measurable structures. Let DDD specify additive automorphisms αp\alpha_pαp​ with α1=id\alpha_1=\mathrm{id}α1​=id, αpq=αp∘αq\alpha_{pq}=\alpha_p\circ\alpha_qαpq​=αp​∘αq​, and jointly continuous evaluation; a measurable function κ:G×G→A\kappa:G\times G\to Aκ:G×G→A satisfying αp(κ(q,r))+κ(p,qr)=κ(p,q)+κ(pq,r)\alpha_p(\kappa(q,r))+\kappa(p,qr)=\kappa(p,q)+\kappa(pq,r)αp​(κ(q,r))+κ(p,qr)=κ(p,q)+κ(pq,r) and κ(1,p)=κ(p,1)=0\kappa(1,p)=\kappa(p,1)=0κ(1,p)=κ(p,1)=0; and an open neighborhood U0U_0U0​ of 111 such that κ\kappaκ is continuous on U02U_0^2U02​. Put E=A×GE=A\times GE=A×G with the operation (a,p)⋆(b,q)=(a+αp(b)+κ(p,q),pq)(a,p)\star(b,q)=(a+\alpha_p(b)+\kappa(p,q),pq)(a,p)⋆(b,q)=(a+αp​(b)+κ(p,q),pq). For arbitrary functions f,g:E→Rf,g:E\to\mathbb Rf,g:E→R, the approximate integral C(f,g)C(f,g)C(f,g) is the real infimum of all sums ∑j=0n−1cj\sum_{j=0}^{n-1}c_j∑j=0n−1​cj​, where nnn is any natural number, cj≥0c_j\ge0cj​≥0, uj∈Eu_j\in Euj​∈E, and f(s)≤∑j=0n−1cjg(uj⋆s)f(s)\le\sum_{j=0}^{n-1}c_jg(u_j\star s)f(s)≤∑j=0n−1​cj​g(uj​⋆s) for every s∈Es\in Es∈E. The empty family n=0n=0n=0 has sum 000 and is admissible exactly when f≤0f\le0f≤0 everywhere. Every admissible cost is nonnegative. If there are no admissible families, the real infimum used here has value 000. There are no continuity, support, sign, or nonzero assumptions on fff or ggg.

QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P08.continuousOneCocycles

Let GGG be a topological group and AAA a topological abelian group, and let ρ\rhoρ specify additive automorphisms αg\alpha_gαg​ of AAA satisfying α1=id⁡A\alpha_1=\operatorname{id}_Aα1​=idA​ and αgh=αg∘αh\alpha_{gh}=\alpha_g\circ\alpha_hαgh​=αg​∘αh​, with (g,a)↦αg(a)(g,a)\mapsto\alpha_g(a)(g,a)↦αg​(a) continuous. This declaration defines the set of all continuous functions c:G→Ac:G\to Ac:G→A satisfying c(st)=c(s)+αs(c(t))c(st)=c(s)+\alpha_s(c(t))c(st)=c(s)+αs​(c(t)) for every s,t∈Gs,t\in Gs,t∈G.

QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P08.coverCosts

Let GGG be a Hausdorff, locally compact, second countable topological group, and let AAA be a Hausdorff, locally compact, second countable additive abelian topological group, both with their Borel measurable structures. Let DDD consist of additive automorphisms αp\alpha_pαp​, with α1=id\alpha_1=\mathrm{id}α1​=id, αpq=αp∘αq\alpha_{pq}=\alpha_p\circ\alpha_qαpq​=αp​∘αq​, and continuous evaluation (p,a)↦αp(a)(p,a)\mapsto\alpha_p(a)(p,a)↦αp​(a); a measurable function κ:G×G→A\kappa:G\times G\to Aκ:G×G→A satisfying αp(κ(q,r))+κ(p,qr)=κ(p,q)+κ(pq,r)\alpha_p(\kappa(q,r))+\kappa(p,qr)=\kappa(p,q)+\kappa(pq,r)αp​(κ(q,r))+κ(p,qr)=κ(p,q)+κ(pq,r) and κ(1,p)=κ(p,1)=0\kappa(1,p)=\kappa(p,1)=0κ(1,p)=κ(p,1)=0; and an open neighborhood U0U_0U0​ of 111 such that κ\kappaκ is continuous on U02U_0^2U02​. Put E=A×GE=A\times GE=A×G and (a,p)⋆(b,q)=(a+αp(b)+κ(p,q),pq)(a,p)\star(b,q)=(a+\alpha_p(b)+\kappa(p,q),pq)(a,p)⋆(b,q)=(a+αp​(b)+κ(p,q),pq). For arbitrary functions f,g:E→Rf,g:E\to\mathbb Rf,g:E→R, the set of cover costs consists exactly of the real numbers rrr for which there exist a natural number nnn, coefficients cj∈Rc_j\in\mathbb Rcj​∈R, and points uj∈Eu_j\in Euj​∈E, indexed by j=0,…,n−1j=0,\ldots,n-1j=0,…,n−1, such that every cj≥0c_j\ge0cj​≥0,

f(s)≤∑j=0n−1cjg(uj⋆s)for every s∈E,r=∑j=0n−1cj.f(s)\le\sum_{j=0}^{n-1}c_jg(u_j\star s)\quad\text{for every }s\in E, \qquad r=\sum_{j=0}^{n-1}c_j.f(s)≤j=0∑n−1​cj​g(uj​⋆s)for every s∈E,r=j=0∑n−1​cj​.

No regularity or sign assumptions are imposed on fff or ggg. Zero coefficients are allowed. The choice n=0n=0n=0 is allowed: both sums then equal 000, the coefficient and point families are empty, and this choice gives the cost r=0r=0r=0 exactly when f(s)≤0f(s)\le0f(s)≤0 for every sss.

QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P08.extensionBorelSpace

Let GGG be a Hausdorff, locally compact, second-countable topological group, and let AAA be a Hausdorff, locally compact, second-countable abelian topological group, both equipped with their Borel σ\sigmaσ-algebras; either group may be trivial. Let D=(ρ,c,N)D=(\rho,c,N)D=(ρ,c,N) consist of additive automorphisms ρg:A→A\rho_g:A\to Aρg​:A→A satisfying ρ1=id\rho_1=\mathrm{id}ρ1​=id and ρgh=ρg∘ρh\rho_{gh}=\rho_g\circ\rho_hρgh​=ρg​∘ρh​, with (g,a)↦ρg(a)(g,a)\mapsto\rho_g(a)(g,a)↦ρg​(a) continuous, a measurable map c:G×G→Ac:G\times G\to Ac:G×G→A satisfying ρg(c(h,k))+c(g,hk)=c(g,h)+c(gh,k)\rho_g(c(h,k))+c(g,hk)=c(g,h)+c(gh,k)ρg​(c(h,k))+c(g,hk)=c(g,h)+c(gh,k) and c(1,g)=c(g,1)=0c(1,g)=c(g,1)=0c(1,g)=c(g,1)=0 for all g,h,k∈Gg,h,k\in Gg,h,k∈G, and an open set N⊆GN\subseteq GN⊆G containing 111 such that ccc is continuous on N×NN\times NN×N. On ED=A×GE_D=A\times GED​=A×G, take the topology generated by the sets

{(a+ρg(b)+c(g,h), gh):b∈UA, h∈UG},\left\{\left(a+\rho_g(b)+c(g,h),\,gh\right): b\in U_A,\ h\in U_G\right\},{(a+ρg​(b)+c(g,h),gh):b∈UA​, h∈UG​},

for all (a,g)∈ED(a,g)\in E_D(a,g)∈ED​, open UA⊆AU_A\subseteq AUA​⊆A containing 000, and open UG⊆GU_G\subseteq GUG​⊆G containing 111 with ccc continuous on UG×UGU_G\times U_GUG​×UG​; take its measurable structure to be the Borel σ\sigmaσ-algebra of that topology. This instance certifies that the chosen measurable structure equals that Borel σ\sigmaσ-algebra.

QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P08.extensionCoordinates

Let GGG be a Hausdorff, locally compact, second-countable topological group, and let AAA be a Hausdorff, locally compact, second-countable abelian topological group, both equipped with their Borel σ\sigmaσ-algebras; either group may be trivial. Let D=(ρ,c,N)D=(\rho,c,N)D=(ρ,c,N) consist of additive automorphisms ρg:A→A\rho_g:A\to Aρg​:A→A satisfying ρ1=id\rho_1=\mathrm{id}ρ1​=id and ρgh=ρg∘ρh\rho_{gh}=\rho_g\circ\rho_hρgh​=ρg​∘ρh​, with (g,a)↦ρg(a)(g,a)\mapsto\rho_g(a)(g,a)↦ρg​(a) continuous, a measurable map c:G×G→Ac:G\times G\to Ac:G×G→A satisfying ρg(c(h,k))+c(g,hk)=c(g,h)+c(gh,k)\rho_g(c(h,k))+c(g,hk)=c(g,h)+c(gh,k)ρg​(c(h,k))+c(g,hk)=c(g,h)+c(gh,k) and c(1,g)=c(g,1)=0c(1,g)=c(g,1)=0c(1,g)=c(g,1)=0 for all g,h,k∈Gg,h,k\in Gg,h,k∈G, and an open set N⊆GN\subseteq GN⊆G containing 111 such that ccc is continuous on N×NN\times NN×N. For the associated set EDE_DED​ of points with an AAA-coordinate and a GGG-coordinate, the definition gives the function qD:ED→A×Gq_D:E_D\to A\times GqD​:ED​→A×G that sends each point with coordinates aaa and ggg to the ordered pair (a,g)(a,g)(a,g).

QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P08.extensionMeasurableSpace

Let GGG be a Hausdorff, locally compact, second-countable topological group, and let AAA be a Hausdorff, locally compact, second-countable abelian topological group, both equipped with their Borel σ\sigmaσ-algebras; either group may be trivial. Let D=(ρ,c,N)D=(\rho,c,N)D=(ρ,c,N) consist of additive automorphisms ρg:A→A\rho_g:A\to Aρg​:A→A satisfying ρ1=id\rho_1=\mathrm{id}ρ1​=id and ρgh=ρg∘ρh\rho_{gh}=\rho_g\circ\rho_hρgh​=ρg​∘ρh​, with (g,a)↦ρg(a)(g,a)\mapsto\rho_g(a)(g,a)↦ρg​(a) continuous, a measurable map c:G×G→Ac:G\times G\to Ac:G×G→A satisfying ρg(c(h,k))+c(g,hk)=c(g,h)+c(gh,k)\rho_g(c(h,k))+c(g,hk)=c(g,h)+c(gh,k)ρg​(c(h,k))+c(g,hk)=c(g,h)+c(gh,k) and c(1,g)=c(g,1)=0c(1,g)=c(g,1)=0c(1,g)=c(g,1)=0 for all g,h,k∈Gg,h,k\in Gg,h,k∈G, and an open set N⊆GN\subseteq GN⊆G containing 111 such that ccc is continuous on N×NN\times NN×N. Give ED=A×GE_D=A\times GED​=A×G the topology generated by all sets

{(a+ρg(b)+c(g,h), gh):b∈UA, h∈UG},\left\{\left(a+\rho_g(b)+c(g,h),\,gh\right): b\in U_A,\ h\in U_G\right\},{(a+ρg​(b)+c(g,h),gh):b∈UA​, h∈UG​},

where (a,g)∈ED(a,g)\in E_D(a,g)∈ED​, UA⊆AU_A\subseteq AUA​⊆A is open and contains 000, and UG⊆GU_G\subseteq GUG​⊆G is open, contains 111, and has ccc continuous on UG×UGU_G\times U_GUG​×UG​. The instance equips EDE_DED​ with the Borel σ\sigmaσ-algebra of this topology, namely the smallest σ\sigmaσ-algebra containing all its open sets.

QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P08.extensionTopology

Let GGG be a Hausdorff, locally compact, second-countable topological group, and let AAA be a Hausdorff, locally compact, second-countable abelian topological group, both equipped with their Borel σ\sigmaσ-algebras; either group may be trivial. Let D=(ρ,c,N)D=(\rho,c,N)D=(ρ,c,N) consist of additive automorphisms ρg:A→A\rho_g:A\to Aρg​:A→A satisfying ρ1=id\rho_1=\mathrm{id}ρ1​=id and ρgh=ρg∘ρh\rho_{gh}=\rho_g\circ\rho_hρgh​=ρg​∘ρh​, with (g,a)↦ρg(a)(g,a)\mapsto\rho_g(a)(g,a)↦ρg​(a) continuous, a measurable map c:G×G→Ac:G\times G\to Ac:G×G→A satisfying ρg(c(h,k))+c(g,hk)=c(g,h)+c(gh,k)\rho_g(c(h,k))+c(g,hk)=c(g,h)+c(gh,k)ρg​(c(h,k))+c(g,hk)=c(g,h)+c(gh,k) and c(1,g)=c(g,1)=0c(1,g)=c(g,1)=0c(1,g)=c(g,1)=0 for all g,h,k∈Gg,h,k\in Gg,h,k∈G, and an open set N⊆GN\subseteq GN⊆G containing 111 such that ccc is continuous on N×NN\times NN×N. The instance equips the set of pairs ED=A×GE_D=A\times GED​=A×G with the smallest topology in which every set

{(a+ρg(b)+c(g,h), gh):b∈UA, h∈UG}\left\{\left(a+\rho_g(b)+c(g,h),\,gh\right): b\in U_A,\ h\in U_G\right\}{(a+ρg​(b)+c(g,h),gh):b∈UA​, h∈UG​}

is open, where (a,g)(a,g)(a,g) ranges over all of EDE_DED​, UAU_AUA​ ranges over open subsets of AAA containing 000, and UGU_GUG​ ranges over open subsets of GGG containing 111 on whose square ccc is continuous. These sets are the generators of the topology, so open sets are arbitrary unions of finite intersections of them, including the empty union and empty intersection.

QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P08.identityPoint

Let GGG be a Hausdorff, locally compact, second-countable topological group, and let AAA be a Hausdorff, locally compact, second-countable abelian topological group, both equipped with their Borel σ\sigmaσ-algebras; either group may be trivial. Let D=(ρ,c,N)D=(\rho,c,N)D=(ρ,c,N) consist of additive automorphisms ρg:A→A\rho_g:A\to Aρg​:A→A satisfying ρ1=id\rho_1=\mathrm{id}ρ1​=id and ρgh=ρg∘ρh\rho_{gh}=\rho_g\circ\rho_hρgh​=ρg​∘ρh​, with (g,a)↦ρg(a)(g,a)\mapsto\rho_g(a)(g,a)↦ρg​(a) continuous, a measurable map c:G×G→Ac:G\times G\to Ac:G×G→A satisfying ρg(c(h,k))+c(g,hk)=c(g,h)+c(gh,k)\rho_g(c(h,k))+c(g,hk)=c(g,h)+c(gh,k)ρg​(c(h,k))+c(g,hk)=c(g,h)+c(gh,k) and c(1,g)=c(g,1)=0c(1,g)=c(g,1)=0c(1,g)=c(g,1)=0 for all g,h,k∈Gg,h,k\in Gg,h,k∈G, and an open set N⊆GN\subseteq GN⊆G containing 111 such that ccc is continuous on N×NN\times NN×N. In the associated set of pairs ED=A×GE_D=A\times GED​=A×G, the definition selects the point identityPoint⁡D=(0,1)\operatorname{identityPoint}_D=(0,1)identityPointD​=(0,1), where 000 is the additive identity of AAA and 111 is the identity of GGG.

QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P08.innerConjugation

Let GGG be a Hausdorff, locally compact, second-countable topological group, and let AAA be a Hausdorff, locally compact, second-countable abelian topological group, both equipped with their Borel σ\sigmaσ-algebras; either group may be trivial. Let D=(ρ,c,N)D=(\rho,c,N)D=(ρ,c,N) consist of additive automorphisms ρg:A→A\rho_g:A\to Aρg​:A→A satisfying ρ1=id\rho_1=\mathrm{id}ρ1​=id and ρgh=ρg∘ρh\rho_{gh}=\rho_g\circ\rho_hρgh​=ρg​∘ρh​, with (g,a)↦ρg(a)(g,a)\mapsto\rho_g(a)(g,a)↦ρg​(a) continuous, a measurable map c:G×G→Ac:G\times G\to Ac:G×G→A satisfying ρg(c(h,k))+c(g,hk)=c(g,h)+c(gh,k)\rho_g(c(h,k))+c(g,hk)=c(g,h)+c(gh,k)ρg​(c(h,k))+c(g,hk)=c(g,h)+c(gh,k) and c(1,g)=c(g,1)=0c(1,g)=c(g,1)=0c(1,g)=c(g,1)=0 for all g,h,k∈Gg,h,k\in Gg,h,k∈G, and an open set N⊆GN\subseteq GN⊆G containing 111 such that ccc is continuous on N×NN\times NN×N. For every x=(a,g)x=(a,g)x=(a,g) and y=(b,h)y=(b,h)y=(b,h) in the set ED=A×GE_D=A\times GED​=A×G, the definition assigns

innerConjugation⁡D(x,y)=(a+ρg(b)+c(g,h)+ρgh ⁣(ρg−1(−(a+c(g,g−1))))+c(gh,g−1), ghg−1).\operatorname{innerConjugation}_D(x,y)= \left( a+\rho_g(b)+c(g,h) +\rho_{gh}\!\left(\rho_{g^{-1}}\bigl(-(a+c(g,g^{-1}))\bigr)\right) +c(gh,g^{-1}), \ ghg^{-1} \right).innerConjugationD​(x,y)=(a+ρg​(b)+c(g,h)+ρgh​(ρg−1​(−(a+c(g,g−1))))+c(gh,g−1), ghg−1).

QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P08.kernelInclusion

Let GGG be a Hausdorff, locally compact, second-countable topological group, and let AAA be a Hausdorff, locally compact, second-countable abelian topological group, both equipped with their Borel σ\sigmaσ-algebras; either group may be trivial. Let D=(ρ,c,N)D=(\rho,c,N)D=(ρ,c,N) consist of additive automorphisms ρg:A→A\rho_g:A\to Aρg​:A→A satisfying ρ1=id\rho_1=\mathrm{id}ρ1​=id and ρgh=ρg∘ρh\rho_{gh}=\rho_g\circ\rho_hρgh​=ρg​∘ρh​, with (g,a)↦ρg(a)(g,a)\mapsto\rho_g(a)(g,a)↦ρg​(a) continuous, a measurable map c:G×G→Ac:G\times G\to Ac:G×G→A satisfying ρg(c(h,k))+c(g,hk)=c(g,h)+c(gh,k)\rho_g(c(h,k))+c(g,hk)=c(g,h)+c(gh,k)ρg​(c(h,k))+c(g,hk)=c(g,h)+c(gh,k) and c(1,g)=c(g,1)=0c(1,g)=c(g,1)=0c(1,g)=c(g,1)=0 for all g,h,k∈Gg,h,k\in Gg,h,k∈G, and an open set N⊆GN\subseteq GN⊆G containing 111 such that ccc is continuous on N×NN\times NN×N. Writing EDE_DED​ for the set of pairs (a,g)∈A×G(a,g)\in A\times G(a,g)∈A×G, the definition gives the function iD:A→EDi_D:A\to E_DiD​:A→ED​ by iD(a)=(a,1)i_D(a)=(a,1)iD​(a)=(a,1) for every a∈Aa\in Aa∈A.

QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P08.leftTranslate

Let GGG be a Hausdorff, locally compact, second countable topological group, and let AAA be a Hausdorff, locally compact, second countable additive abelian topological group, both with their Borel measurable structures. Let DDD specify additive automorphisms αp\alpha_pαp​ satisfying α1=id\alpha_1=\mathrm{id}α1​=id and αpq=αp∘αq\alpha_{pq}=\alpha_p\circ\alpha_qαpq​=αp​∘αq​, with (p,a)↦αp(a)(p,a)\mapsto\alpha_p(a)(p,a)↦αp​(a) continuous; a measurable function κ:G×G→A\kappa:G\times G\to Aκ:G×G→A satisfying αp(κ(q,r))+κ(p,qr)=κ(p,q)+κ(pq,r)\alpha_p(\kappa(q,r))+\kappa(p,qr)=\kappa(p,q)+\kappa(pq,r)αp​(κ(q,r))+κ(p,qr)=κ(p,q)+κ(pq,r) and κ(1,p)=κ(p,1)=0\kappa(1,p)=\kappa(p,1)=0κ(1,p)=κ(p,1)=0; and an open neighborhood U0U_0U0​ of 111 on whose square κ\kappaκ is continuous. Elements of EEE are pairs in A×GA\times GA×G. For any function f:E→Rf:E\to\mathbb Rf:E→R and any x=(a,p)∈Ex=(a,p)\in Ex=(a,p)∈E, its left translate Lxf:E→RL_xf:E\to\mathbb RLx​f:E→R is defined by

(Lxf)(b,q)=f(a+αp(b)+κ(p,q), pq).(L_xf)(b,q)=f\bigl(a+\alpha_p(b)+\kappa(p,q),\,pq\bigr).(Lx​f)(b,q)=f(a+αp​(b)+κ(p,q),pq).

No continuity, support, sign, or nonzero condition is imposed on fff.

QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P08.localConvolution

Let GGG be a Hausdorff, locally compact, second countable topological group, and let AAA be a Hausdorff, locally compact, second countable topological abelian group, both equipped with their Borel measurable structures. Let DDD specify additive automorphisms ρg\rho_gρg​ of AAA satisfying ρ1=id\rho_1=\mathrm{id}ρ1​=id, ρgh=ρg∘ρh\rho_{gh}=\rho_g\circ\rho_hρgh​=ρg​∘ρh​, and joint continuity of (g,a)↦ρg(a)(g,a)\mapsto\rho_g(a)(g,a)↦ρg​(a); a measurable function c:G×G→Ac:G\times G\to Ac:G×G→A satisfying ρg(c(h,k))+c(g,hk)=c(g,h)+c(gh,k)\rho_g(c(h,k))+c(g,hk)=c(g,h)+c(gh,k)ρg​(c(h,k))+c(g,hk)=c(g,h)+c(gh,k) and c(1,g)=c(g,1)=0c(1,g)=c(g,1)=0c(1,g)=c(g,1)=0; and an open neighborhood NNN of 111 on whose square ccc is continuous. On E=A×GE=A\times GE=A×G, define (a,g)⋆(b,h)=(a+ρg(b)+c(g,h),gh)(a,g)\star(b,h)=(a+\rho_g(b)+c(g,h),gh)(a,g)⋆(b,h)=(a+ρg​(b)+c(g,h),gh). Equip EEE with the topology generated by all sets {z⋆(a,g):a∈P, g∈Q}\{z\star(a,g):a\in P,\ g\in Q\}{z⋆(a,g):a∈P, g∈Q}, where z∈Ez\in Ez∈E, PPP is an open neighborhood of 000 in AAA, QQQ is an open neighborhood of 111 in GGG, and ccc is continuous on Q×QQ\times QQ×Q, and use its Borel measurable structure. For any measure μ\muμ on EEE, any subset M⊆EM\subseteq EM⊆E, and any x∈Ex\in Ex∈E, this definition assigns the real number obtained from the extended nonnegative measure μ(M∩{x⋆y:y∈M})\mu(M\cap\{x\star y:y\in M\})μ(M∩{x⋆y:y∈M}) by retaining its value when it is finite and assigning 000 when it is infinite. No measurability, finiteness, positivity, or invariance hypothesis is required here for MMM or μ\muμ; in particular, the defined function is identically zero when MMM is empty.

QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P08.locallyContinuousOneCocycles

Let GGG be a topological group and AAA a topological abelian group, with their given measurable structures, and let ρ\rhoρ specify additive automorphisms αg\alpha_gαg​ of AAA satisfying α1=id⁡A\alpha_1=\operatorname{id}_Aα1​=idA​ and αgh=αg∘αh\alpha_{gh}=\alpha_g\circ\alpha_hαgh​=αg​∘αh​, with (g,a)↦αg(a)(g,a)\mapsto\alpha_g(a)(g,a)↦αg​(a) continuous. This declaration defines the set of all functions c:G→Ac:G\to Ac:G→A that are measurable, are continuous on some open set U⊆GU\subseteq GU⊆G containing 111, and satisfy c(st)=c(s)+αs(c(t))c(st)=c(s)+\alpha_s(c(t))c(st)=c(s)+αs​(c(t)) for every s,t∈Gs,t\in Gs,t∈G.

QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P08.normalizedIntegral

Let GGG be a Hausdorff, locally compact, second countable topological group, and let AAA be a Hausdorff, locally compact, second countable additive abelian topological group, both with their Borel measurable structures. Let DDD consist of additive automorphisms αp\alpha_pαp​, with α1=id\alpha_1=\mathrm{id}α1​=id, αpq=αp∘αq\alpha_{pq}=\alpha_p\circ\alpha_qαpq​=αp​∘αq​, and jointly continuous evaluation; a measurable function κ:G×G→A\kappa:G\times G\to Aκ:G×G→A satisfying αp(κ(q,r))+κ(p,qr)=κ(p,q)+κ(pq,r)\alpha_p(\kappa(q,r))+\kappa(p,qr)=\kappa(p,q)+\kappa(pq,r)αp​(κ(q,r))+κ(p,qr)=κ(p,q)+κ(pq,r) and κ(1,p)=κ(p,1)=0\kappa(1,p)=\kappa(p,1)=0κ(1,p)=κ(p,1)=0; and an open neighborhood U0U_0U0​ of 111 on whose square κ\kappaκ is continuous. Put E=A×GE=A\times GE=A×G and (a,p)⋆(b,q)=(a+αp(b)+κ(p,q),pq)(a,p)\star(b,q)=(a+\alpha_p(b)+\kappa(p,q),pq)(a,p)⋆(b,q)=(a+αp​(b)+κ(p,q),pq). For functions h,k:E→Rh,k:E\to\mathbb Rh,k:E→R, let C(h,k)C(h,k)C(h,k) be the real infimum of the costs ∑j=0n−1cj\sum_{j=0}^{n-1}c_j∑j=0n−1​cj​ over all finite families cj≥0c_j\ge0cj​≥0, uj∈Eu_j\in Euj​∈E, satisfying h(s)≤∑j=0n−1cjk(uj⋆s)h(s)\le\sum_{j=0}^{n-1}c_jk(u_j\star s)h(s)≤∑j=0n−1​cj​k(uj​⋆s) for every sss; n=0n=0n=0 is allowed, with empty sum 000, and an empty set of admissible costs has infimum 000. For arbitrary functions g,ϕ,f:E→Rg,\phi,f:E\to\mathbb Rg,ϕ,f:E→R, the normalized integral is defined by

Jg,ϕ(f)=C(f,ϕ)C(g,ϕ).J_{g,\phi}(f)=\frac{C(f,\phi)}{C(g,\phi)}.Jg,ϕ​(f)=C(g,ϕ)C(f,ϕ)​.

No regularity, support, sign, or nonzero assumptions are imposed on these functions. Division is the total real division operation, so if C(g,ϕ)=0C(g,\phi)=0C(g,ϕ)=0, this definition gives Jg,ϕ(f)=0J_{g,\phi}(f)=0Jg,ϕ​(f)=0.

QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P08.quotientProjection

Let GGG be a Hausdorff, locally compact, second-countable topological group, and let AAA be a Hausdorff, locally compact, second-countable abelian topological group, both equipped with their Borel σ\sigmaσ-algebras; either group may be trivial. Let D=(ρ,c,N)D=(\rho,c,N)D=(ρ,c,N) consist of additive automorphisms ρg:A→A\rho_g:A\to Aρg​:A→A satisfying ρ1=id\rho_1=\mathrm{id}ρ1​=id and ρgh=ρg∘ρh\rho_{gh}=\rho_g\circ\rho_hρgh​=ρg​∘ρh​, with (g,a)↦ρg(a)(g,a)\mapsto\rho_g(a)(g,a)↦ρg​(a) continuous, a measurable map c:G×G→Ac:G\times G\to Ac:G×G→A satisfying ρg(c(h,k))+c(g,hk)=c(g,h)+c(gh,k)\rho_g(c(h,k))+c(g,hk)=c(g,h)+c(gh,k)ρg​(c(h,k))+c(g,hk)=c(g,h)+c(gh,k) and c(1,g)=c(g,1)=0c(1,g)=c(g,1)=0c(1,g)=c(g,1)=0 for all g,h,k∈Gg,h,k\in Gg,h,k∈G, and an open set N⊆GN\subseteq GN⊆G containing 111 such that ccc is continuous on N×NN\times NN×N. Writing EDE_DED​ for the set of pairs (a,g)∈A×G(a,g)\in A\times G(a,g)∈A×G, the definition gives the function pD:ED→Gp_D:E_D\to GpD​:ED​→G by pD(a,g)=gp_D(a,g)=gpD​(a,g)=g for every (a,g)∈ED(a,g)\in E_D(a,g)∈ED​.

QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P08.translatedRectangles

Let GGG be a Hausdorff, locally compact, second-countable topological group, and let AAA be a Hausdorff, locally compact, second-countable abelian topological group, both equipped with their Borel σ\sigmaσ-algebras; either group may be trivial. Let D=(ρ,c,N)D=(\rho,c,N)D=(ρ,c,N) consist of additive automorphisms ρg:A→A\rho_g:A\to Aρg​:A→A satisfying ρ1=id\rho_1=\mathrm{id}ρ1​=id and ρgh=ρg∘ρh\rho_{gh}=\rho_g\circ\rho_hρgh​=ρg​∘ρh​, with (g,a)↦ρg(a)(g,a)\mapsto\rho_g(a)(g,a)↦ρg​(a) continuous, a measurable map c:G×G→Ac:G\times G\to Ac:G×G→A satisfying ρg(c(h,k))+c(g,hk)=c(g,h)+c(gh,k)\rho_g(c(h,k))+c(g,hk)=c(g,h)+c(gh,k)ρg​(c(h,k))+c(g,hk)=c(g,h)+c(gh,k) and c(1,g)=c(g,1)=0c(1,g)=c(g,1)=0c(1,g)=c(g,1)=0 for all g,h,k∈Gg,h,k\in Gg,h,k∈G, and an open set N⊆GN\subseteq GN⊆G containing 111 such that ccc is continuous on N×NN\times NN×N. On the set ED=A×GE_D=A\times GED​=A×G, the definition specifies the family RD\mathcal R_DRD​ of all subsets V⊆EDV\subseteq E_DV⊆ED​ for which there exist a point (a,g)∈ED(a,g)\in E_D(a,g)∈ED​, an open set UA⊆AU_A\subseteq AUA​⊆A containing 000, and an open set UG⊆GU_G\subseteq GUG​⊆G containing 111, such that ccc is continuous on UG×UGU_G\times U_GUG​×UG​ and

V={(a+ρg(b)+c(g,h), gh):b∈UA, h∈UG}.V=\left\{\left(a+\rho_g(b)+c(g,h),\,gh\right): b\in U_A,\ h\in U_G\right\}.V={(a+ρg​(b)+c(g,h),gh):b∈UA​, h∈UG​}.

There is no requirement that UGU_GUG​ be contained in the specified set NNN.

QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P08.twistedInv

Let GGG be a Hausdorff, locally compact, second-countable topological group, and let AAA be a Hausdorff, locally compact, second-countable abelian topological group, both equipped with their Borel σ\sigmaσ-algebras; either group may be trivial. Let D=(ρ,c,N)D=(\rho,c,N)D=(ρ,c,N) consist of additive automorphisms ρg:A→A\rho_g:A\to Aρg​:A→A satisfying ρ1=id\rho_1=\mathrm{id}ρ1​=id and ρgh=ρg∘ρh\rho_{gh}=\rho_g\circ\rho_hρgh​=ρg​∘ρh​, with (g,a)↦ρg(a)(g,a)\mapsto\rho_g(a)(g,a)↦ρg​(a) continuous, a measurable map c:G×G→Ac:G\times G\to Ac:G×G→A satisfying

ρg(c(h,k))+c(g,hk)=c(g,h)+c(gh,k),c(1,g)=c(g,1)=0\rho_g(c(h,k))+c(g,hk)=c(g,h)+c(gh,k), \qquad c(1,g)=c(g,1)=0ρg​(c(h,k))+c(g,hk)=c(g,h)+c(gh,k),c(1,g)=c(g,1)=0

for all g,h,k∈Gg,h,k\in Gg,h,k∈G, and an open set N⊆GN\subseteq GN⊆G containing 111 such that ccc is continuous on N×NN\times NN×N. The points associated with DDD are pairs (a,g)∈A×G(a,g)\in A\times G(a,g)∈A×G. For every such point, the definition assigns

twistedInv⁡D(a,g)=(ρg−1(−(a+c(g,g−1))), g−1).\operatorname{twistedInv}_D(a,g) =\left(\rho_{g^{-1}}\bigl(-(a+c(g,g^{-1}))\bigr),\,g^{-1}\right).twistedInvD​(a,g)=(ρg−1​(−(a+c(g,g−1))),g−1).
Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Nov 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by Gohan · Nov 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me