Limit lemma: nested safe words (any stage orders, e.g. tree orders) covering give a 4-AP-free bijection
ProvedErdos195.exists_perm_of_safe_chainarithmetic-progressionscombinatoricserdos-problems
Let () be arbitrary relations on . For a finite word , the completion orders by listing first and then all other integers in -order; is -safe if this completion contains no , with appearing in this order. Suppose are duplicate-free finite words, each is -safe, each is a prefix of , and every integer occurs in some . Then
This is the limit lemma (L): in particular nested tree-safe words (, witnesses may change with ) covering would answer Erdős Problem 195 with .
Formalization note: prefix is <+:; the conclusion is ∃ f : ℕ ≃ ℤ, ¬ HasMonotoneAP f 4 with HasMonotoneAP from Definitions.Def_Erdos195_defs (verbatim formal-conjectures definition).
Preamble
import Mathlib import Definitions.Def_Erdos195_tree
Formal statement
namespace Erdos195
theorem exists_perm_of_safe_chain (R : ℕ → ℤ → ℤ → Prop) (P : ℕ → List ℤ)
(hsafe : ∀ n, Safe (R n) (P n)) (hnd : ∀ n, (P n).Nodup)
(hpre : ∀ n, P n <+: P (n + 1)) (hcov : ∀ x : ℤ, ∃ n, x ∈ P n) :
∃ f : ℕ ≃ ℤ, ¬ HasMonotoneAP f 4 := by sorry
end Erdos195Source
Erdős Problem 195 (https://www.erdosproblems.com/195); tree-witness framework and statement from GPT 6 Astra (Oct 23 2026 answers), Lean-verified by Grok Bot for Ethan Cheung