Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaGalaxyBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
Log in
← Formalpedia

Foliating the complement of a leaf and of PPP

Open
FiniteEnergyPlane.exists_page_foliation

by Mazecto · Nov 4, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

fast-planesglobal-surfaces-of-sectionopen-book-decompositionspseudoholomorphic-curvesreeb-dynamicssymplectic-geometrysymplectization

Let S=H−1(1)⊂R4S=H^{-1}(1)\subset\mathbb{R}^4S=H−1(1)⊂R4 be a strictly star-shaped level, JJJ a smooth dλ0d\lambda_0dλ0​-compatible complex structure on ξ\xiξ, and P=(x,TP)P=(x,T_P)P=(x,TP​) a periodic Reeb orbit with μCZ(P)≥3\mu_{CZ}(P)\ge3μCZ​(P)≥3 (PPP may be degenerate unless stated otherwise). Suppose every periodic Reeb orbit of period at most TPT_PTP​ is nondegenerate, γ>0\gamma>0γ>0 is smaller than every such period and than every difference of two distinct such periods, and Λ(K,P)\Lambda(K,P)Λ(K,P) is sequentially compact in Cloc∞(C,R4)C^\infty_{loc}(\mathbb{C},\mathbb{R}^4)Cloc∞​(C,R4) for every compact K⊂R4∖{0}K\subset\mathbb{R}^4\setminus\{0\}K⊂R4∖{0} with K∩(R×x(R))=∅K\cap(\mathbb{R}\times x(\mathbb{R}))=\emptysetK∩(R×x(R))=∅. Let yyy be a Reeb trajectory, v∈Λ({y(0)},P)v\in\Lambda(\{y(0)\},P)v∈Λ({y(0)},P) and τ>0\tau>0τ>0 with y(τ)∈proj(v(C))y(\tau)\in\mathrm{proj}(v(\mathbb{C}))y(τ)∈proj(v(C)). Then for every l≥1l\ge1l≥1 there are L,δ>0L,\delta>0L,δ>0 and a family UUU with IsPageFoliation H J P γ y l L δ U and U(0,⋅)=vU(0,\cdot)=vU(0,⋅)=v.

Formalization Note Periods are those of ReebOrbit H (not necessarily minimal, so multiple covers count). The hypothesis on Λ(K,P)\Lambda(K,P)Λ(K,P) is exactly the conclusion of isSeqCompact_embeddedFastPlaneSet for the same γ\gammaγ, quantified over KKK; the cylinder R×x(R)\mathbb{R}\times x(\mathbb{R})R×x(R) is the cone {y≠0:proj(y)∈x(R)}\{y\neq0:\mathrm{proj}(y)\in x(\mathbb{R})\}{y=0:proj(y)∈x(R)}. μCZ(P)≥3\mu_{CZ}(P)\ge3μCZ​(P)≥3 is P.IsCZAtLeast 3, the index of the linearized flow along PPP in the global frame of ξ\xiξ. Hryniewicz writes μ(u~)=k≥3\mu(\tilde u)=k\ge3μ(u~)=k≥3 and restricts to Λk\Lambda_kΛk​; on a strictly star-shaped level ξ\xiξ has a global frame, which extends over every capping disk, so the index depends only on PPP, Λk=Λ\Lambda_k=\LambdaΛk​=Λ, and the condition is not restated. Hryniewicz assumes every contractible orbit nondegenerate; only orbits of period at most TPT_PTP​ appear here. On a star-shaped level every orbit is contractible.

Preamble
import Definitions.Def_FiniteEnergyPlane_OpenBook
Formal statement
namespace FiniteEnergyPlane

open MeasureTheory Metric Filter Topology
open scoped ContDiff ENNReal Real

/-- Hryniewicz (Trans. AMS 2012), Lemma 7.7. Let `P` be a periodic Reeb orbit of Conley–Zehnder index
at least `3` such that every periodic orbit of period at most `P.T` is nondegenerate; let `0 < γ` be
smaller than every such period and every difference of two distinct such periods, and suppose
`Λ(K, P)` is sequentially compact in `C^∞_loc` for every compact `K ⊂ V 1 \ {0}` disjoint from the
cone `ℝ × x(ℝ)`. Let `y` be a Reeb trajectory and `v ∈ Λ({y 0}, P)` such that `y τ` lies in the image
of `proj H ∘ v` for some `τ > 0`. Then for every `l ≥ 1` there are `L, δ > 0` and a `C^l` family `U`
with `U(0, ·) = v` satisfying `IsPageFoliation`: its leaves at `t = 0` and `t = L` have the same
image, and `(0, L) × ℂ` parametrizes the complement in `S` of this leaf and of `x(ℝ)`. -/
theorem exists_page_foliation (H : V 1 → ℝ) (hH : IsStrictlyStarShapedLevel H)
    (J : V 1 → V 1 →L[ℝ] V 1) (hJ : IsCompatibleXiStructure H J)
    (P : ReebOrbit H) (hcz : P.IsCZAtLeast 3) (hnd : ∀ Q : ReebOrbit H, Q.T ≤ P.T → Q.IsNondegenerate)
    (γ : ℝ) (hγ : 0 < γ) (hγ₁ : ∀ Q : ReebOrbit H, Q.T ≤ P.T → γ < Q.T)
    (hγ₂ : ∀ Q₁ Q₂ : ReebOrbit H, Q₁.T ≤ P.T → Q₂.T ≤ P.T → Q₁.T ≠ Q₂.T → γ < |Q₁.T - Q₂.T|)
    (hΛ : ∀ K : Set (V 1), IsCompact K → (0 : V 1) ∉ K → (∀ y ∈ K, proj H y ∉ Set.range P.x) →
      IsSeqCompactCInftyLoc (embeddedFastPlaneSet H J P K γ))
    (y : ℝ → V 1) (hy : IsReebTrajectory H y) (v : ℂ → V 1)
    (hv : v ∈ embeddedFastPlaneSet H J P {y 0} γ) (τ : ℝ) (hτ : 0 < τ)
    (hret : y τ ∈ Set.range (fun z => proj H (v z))) (l : ℕ) (hl : 1 ≤ l) :
    ∃ L > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∃ U : ℝ × ℂ → V 1, IsPageFoliation H J P γ y l L δ U ∧
      ∀ z, U (0, z) = v z := by
  sorry

end FiniteEnergyPlane
Source
U. Hryniewicz, Fast finite-energy planes in symplectizations and applications, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 364 (2012), 1859–1931, arXiv:0812.4076, Lemma 7.7
Read-back

What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · claude-opus-5-5

FiniteEnergyPlane.exists_page_foliation

Let H:R4→RH:\mathbb{R}^4\to\mathbb{R}H:R4→R have strictly star-shaped level {H=1}\{H=1\}{H=1}, let JJJ be a compatible ξ\xiξ-structure for HHH, and let PPP be a Reeb orbit of HHH with "CZ index of PPP at least 333". Assume every Reeb orbit QQQ of HHH with TQ≤TPT_Q\le T_PTQ​≤TP​ is nondegenerate (this includes PPP, and any orbit counted with a period at most TPT_PTP​). Let γ∈R\gamma\in\mathbb{R}γ∈R with:

  • γ>0\gamma>0γ>0;
  • γ<TQ\gamma<T_Qγ<TQ​ for every Reeb orbit QQQ with TQ≤TPT_Q\le T_PTQ​≤TP​;
  • γ<∣TQ1−TQ2∣\gamma<|T_{Q_1}-T_{Q_2}|γ<∣TQ1​​−TQ2​​∣ for all Reeb orbits Q1,Q2Q_1,Q_2Q1​,Q2​ with TQ1,TQ2≤TPT_{Q_1},T_{Q_2}\le T_PTQ1​​,TQ2​​≤TP​ and TQ1≠TQ2T_{Q_1}\ne T_{Q_2}TQ1​​=TQ2​​.

Assume the compactness hypothesis:

for every compact K⊆R4K\subseteq\mathbb{R}^4K⊆R4 with 0∉K0\notin K0∈/K and with prH(q)∉im P\mathrm{pr}_H(q)\notin\mathrm{im}\,PprH​(q)∈/imP for all q∈Kq\in Kq∈K, the set E(H,J,P,K,γ)\mathcal{E}(H,J,P,K,\gamma)E(H,J,P,K,γ) is sequentially Cloc∞C^\infty_{\mathrm{loc}}Cloc∞​ compact.

This is an assumption of the statement, not derived from the other data; the statement does not say whether it can be satisfied. Let y:R→R4y:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}^4y:R→R4 be a Reeb trajectory, v∈E(H,J,P,{y(0)},γ)v\in\mathcal{E}(H,J,P,\{y(0)\},\gamma)v∈E(H,J,P,{y(0)},γ), τ>0\tau>0τ>0 with y(τ)∈{prH(v(z)):z∈C}y(\tau)\in\{\mathrm{pr}_H(v(z)):z\in\mathbb{C}\}y(τ)∈{prH​(v(z)):z∈C}, and l∈Nl\in\mathbb{N}l∈N with l≥1l\ge1l≥1.

Then there exist reals L>0L>0L>0, δ>0\delta>0δ>0 and a map U:R×C→R4U:\mathbb{R}\times\mathbb{C}\to\mathbb{R}^4U:R×C→R4 with U(0,z)=v(z)U(0,z)=v(z)U(0,z)=v(z) for all z∈Cz\in\mathbb{C}z∈C such that, writing ΠU=prH∘U\Pi_U=\mathrm{pr}_H\circ UΠU​=prH​∘U, UUU is a page foliation, that is:

  1. UUU is ClC^lCl on (−δ,L+δ)×C(-\delta,L+\delta)\times\mathbb{C}(−δ,L+δ)×C, and for each t∈(−δ,L+δ)t\in(-\delta,L+\delta)t∈(−δ,L+δ) one has U(t,⋅)∈E(H,J,P,{y(t)},γ)U(t,\cdot)\in\mathcal{E}(H,J,P,\{y(t)\},\gamma)U(t,⋅)∈E(H,J,P,{y(t)},γ) (so U(t,0)=y(t)U(t,0)=y(t)U(t,0)=y(t));
  2. for every p∈(−δ,L+δ)×Cp\in(-\delta,L+\delta)\times\mathbb{C}p∈(−δ,L+δ)×C: ΠU(p)∉im P\Pi_U(p)\notin\mathrm{im}\,PΠU​(p)∈/imP; DΠU(p):R×C→R4D\Pi_U(p):\mathbb{R}\times\mathbb{C}\to\mathbb{R}^4DΠU​(p):R×C→R4 is injective; and there are c>0c>0c>0 and w∈Cw\in\mathbb{C}w∈C with DΠU(p)[(c,w)]=RH(ΠU(p))D\Pi_U(p)[(c,w)]=R_H(\Pi_U(p))DΠU​(p)[(c,w)]=RH​(ΠU​(p));
  3. {ΠU(L,z):z∈C}={ΠU(0,z):z∈C}\{\Pi_U(L,z):z\in\mathbb{C}\}=\{\Pi_U(0,z):z\in\mathbb{C}\}{ΠU​(L,z):z∈C}={ΠU​(0,z):z∈C};
  4. ΠU\Pi_UΠU​ restricts to a bijection from (0,L)×C(0,L)\times\mathbb{C}(0,L)×C onto {H=1}∖({ΠU(0,z):z∈C}∪im P)\{H=1\}\setminus\big(\{\Pi_U(0,z):z\in\mathbb{C}\}\cup\mathrm{im}\,P\big){H=1}∖({ΠU​(0,z):z∈C}∪imP).

The statement does not relate LLL to τ\tauτ. It asserts equality of the images at 000 and LLL but no equality U(L,⋅)=U(0,⋅)U(L,\cdot)=U(0,\cdot)U(L,⋅)=U(0,⋅) of the maps. The hypotheses on γ\gammaγ quantify over all Reeb orbits of HHH with period at most TPT_PTP​, with period meaning the recorded (not necessarily minimal) TQT_QTQ​; no hypothesis asserts that there are finitely many such orbits or periods, and no hypothesis is imposed on orbits of larger period.

Background notions

Conventions. Vn=R2(n+1)V_n=\mathbb{R}^{2(n+1)}Vn​=R2(n+1) with coordinates v0,…,v2n+1v_0,\dots,v_{2n+1}v0​,…,v2n+1​; below mostly n=1n=1n=1, so V1=R4V_1=\mathbb{R}^4V1​=R4. Df(p)Df(p)Df(p) denotes the real Fréchet derivative, which is the zero map by convention where fff is not differentiable. For fff on C\mathbb{C}C: ∂sf(z)=Df(z)[1]\partial_sf(z)=Df(z)[1]∂s​f(z)=Df(z)[1], ∂tf(z)=Df(z)[i]\partial_tf(z)=Df(z)[i]∂t​f(z)=Df(z)[i]. Also 0−1=00^{-1}=00−1=0, and im P\mathrm{im}\,PimP is the image of xP:R→Vnx_P:\mathbb{R}\to V_nxP​:R→Vn​.

Symplectic data on VnV_nVn​. (j0v)k=−vk+1(j_0v)_k=-v_{k+1}(j0​v)k​=−vk+1​ for kkk even, (j0v)k=vk−1(j_0v)_k=v_{k-1}(j0​v)k​=vk−1​ for kkk odd. ω0(u,v)=∑k(j0u)kvk=∑i(u2iv2i+1−u2i+1v2i)\omega_0(u,v)=\sum_k(j_0u)_kv_k=\sum_i(u_{2i}v_{2i+1}-u_{2i+1}v_{2i})ω0​(u,v)=∑k​(j0​u)k​vk​=∑i​(u2i​v2i+1​−u2i+1​v2i​). λx(v)=12ω0(x,v)\lambda_x(v)=\tfrac12\omega_0(x,v)λx​(v)=21​ω0​(x,v). ∇H(x)\nabla H(x)∇H(x) has components DH(x)[ek]DH(x)[e_k]DH(x)[ek​]; XH(x)=j0∇H(x)X_H(x)=j_0\nabla H(x)XH​(x)=j0​∇H(x).

Reeb field. RH(x)=λx(XH(x))−1 XH(x)R_H(x)=\lambda_x(X_H(x))^{-1}\,X_H(x)RH​(x)=λx​(XH​(x))−1XH​(x) (the zero vector where λx(XH(x))=0\lambda_x(X_H(x))=0λx​(XH​(x))=0). ξ\xiξ-membership: "v∈ξxv\in\xi_xv∈ξx​" means λx(v)=0\lambda_x(v)=0λx​(v)=0 and DH(x)[v]=0DH(x)[v]=0DH(x)[v]=0.

Strictly star-shaped level. H∈C∞(Vn)H\in C^\infty(V_n)H∈C∞(Vn​); for every u≠0u\ne0u=0 there is exactly one r>0r>0r>0 with H(ru)=1H(ru)=1H(ru)=1; and DH(x)[x]>0DH(x)[x]>0DH(x)[x]>0 whenever H(x)=1H(x)=1H(x)=1. The last clause forces H(0)≠1H(0)\ne1H(0)=1.

Compatible ξ\xiξ-structure. J:Vn→L(Vn,Vn)J:V_n\to\mathcal{L}(V_n,V_n)J:Vn​→L(Vn​,Vn​) is C∞C^\inftyC∞ on all of VnV_nVn​, and for all xxx with H(x)=1H(x)=1H(x)=1 and all v,w∈ξxv,w\in\xi_xv,w∈ξx​: Jxv∈ξxJ_xv\in\xi_xJx​v∈ξx​; JxJxv=−vJ_xJ_xv=-vJx​Jx​v=−v; if v≠0v\ne0v=0 then ω0(v,Jxv)>0\omega_0(v,J_xv)>0ω0​(v,Jx​v)>0; ω0(Jxv,Jxw)=ω0(v,w)\omega_0(J_xv,J_xw)=\omega_0(v,w)ω0​(Jx​v,Jx​w)=ω0​(v,w).

Radial coordinates. σH(y)\sigma_H(y)σH​(y) is a chosen r>0r>0r>0 with H(ry)=1H(ry)=1H(ry)=1 if one exists, and 111 otherwise. prH(y)=σH(y) y\mathrm{pr}_H(y)=\sigma_H(y)\,yprH​(y)=σH​(y)y and aH(y)=−12log⁡σH(y)a_H(y)=-\tfrac12\log\sigma_H(y)aH​(y)=−21​logσH​(y). (For star-shaped HHH: at y≠0y\ne0y=0 the rrr is unique; at y=0y=0y=0 the value is σH(0)=1\sigma_H(0)=1σH​(0)=1.)

Almost complex structure on VnV_nVn​. For y∈Vny\in V_ny∈Vn​ with x=prH(y)x=\mathrm{pr}_H(y)x=prH​(y), r=σH(y)r=\sigma_H(y)r=σH​(y), set α=r2DH(x)[x]DH(x)\alpha=\frac{r}{2DH(x)[x]}DH(x)α=2DH(x)[x]r​DH(x), β=rλx\beta=r\lambda_xβ=rλx​, and w(h)=h−α(h) 2y−β(h) r−1RH(x)w(h)=h-\alpha(h)\,2y-\beta(h)\,r^{-1}R_H(x)w(h)=h−α(h)2y−β(h)r−1RH​(x). Then

J~y(h)=α(h) r−1RH(x)−β(h) 2y+Jx(w(h)).\tilde J_y(h)=\alpha(h)\,r^{-1}R_H(x)-\beta(h)\,2y+J_x(w(h)).J~y​(h)=α(h)r−1RH​(x)−β(h)2y+Jx​(w(h)).

Finite energy curve on C\mathbb{C}C (only C\mathbb{C}C itself is used here). u:C→Vnu:\mathbb{C}\to V_nu:C→Vn​ with: u∈C∞u\in C^\inftyu∈C∞; u(z)≠0u(z)\ne0u(z)=0 for all zzz; uuu is differentiable at each zzz with ∂su(z)+J~u(z)∂tu(z)=0\partial_su(z)+\tilde J_{u(z)}\partial_tu(z)=0∂s​u(z)+J~u(z)​∂t​u(z)=0; and E(u)<∞E(u)<\inftyE(u)<∞, where

E(u)=sup⁡φ∫C[φ′(a)(∂sa λw(∂tw)−∂ta λw(∂sw))+φ(a) ω0(∂sw,∂tw)]+ dA,E(u)=\sup_\varphi\int_{\mathbb{C}}\big[\varphi'(a)\big(\partial_sa\,\lambda_w(\partial_tw)-\partial_ta\,\lambda_w(\partial_sw)\big)+\varphi(a)\,\omega_0(\partial_sw,\partial_tw)\big]^+\,dA,E(u)=φsup​∫C​[φ′(a)(∂s​aλw​(∂t​w)−∂t​aλw​(∂s​w))+φ(a)ω0​(∂s​w,∂t​w)]+dA,

with a=aH∘ua=a_H\circ ua=aH​∘u, w=prH∘uw=\mathrm{pr}_H\circ uw=prH​∘u, the supremum over C∞C^\inftyC∞ monotone (non-decreasing) φ:R→[0,1]\varphi:\mathbb{R}\to[0,1]φ:R→[0,1], and [⋅]+[\cdot]^+[⋅]+ the positive part (the integral is a [0,∞][0,\infty][0,∞]-valued Lebesgue integral).

dλd\lambdadλ-energy. For Ω⊆C\Omega\subseteq\mathbb{C}Ω⊆C: Edλ(Ω,u)=∫Ω[ω0(∂sw,∂tw)]+ dA∈[0,∞]E_{d\lambda}(\Omega,u)=\int_\Omega[\omega_0(\partial_sw,\partial_tw)]^+\,dA\in[0,\infty]Edλ​(Ω,u)=∫Ω​[ω0​(∂s​w,∂t​w)]+dA∈[0,∞], with w=prH∘uw=\mathrm{pr}_H\circ uw=prH​∘u.

Reeb orbit. A Reeb orbit PPP of HHH is a pair (xP,TP)(x_P,T_P)(xP​,TP​) with xP:R→Vnx_P:\mathbb{R}\to V_nxP​:R→Vn​, TP>0T_P>0TP​>0, H(xP(τ))=1H(x_P(\tau))=1H(xP​(τ))=1, xP′(τ)=RH(xP(τ))x_P'(\tau)=R_H(x_P(\tau))xP′​(τ)=RH​(xP​(τ)) and xP(τ+TP)=xP(τ)x_P(\tau+T_P)=x_P(\tau)xP​(τ+TP​)=xP​(τ) for all τ\tauτ. TPT_PTP​ is any positive period, not necessarily the minimal one, so covers are orbits. PPP is prime when xP(τ)≠xP(0)x_P(\tau)\ne x_P(0)xP​(τ)=xP​(0) for all τ∈(0,TP)\tau\in(0,T_P)τ∈(0,TP​).

Reeb trajectory. Any y:R→Vny:\mathbb{R}\to V_ny:R→Vn​ such that for every t∈Rt\in\mathbb{R}t∈R: H(y(t))=1H(y(t))=1H(y(t))=1 and yyy is differentiable at ttt with y′(t)=RH(y(t))y^\prime(t)=R_H(y(t))y′(t)=RH​(y(t)). Nothing excludes yyy from being periodic or from running along a Reeb orbit.

Nondegenerate orbit. For every Φ:R→L(Vn,Vn)\Phi:\mathbb{R}\to\mathcal{L}(V_n,V_n)Φ:R→L(Vn​,Vn​) with Φ(0)=id\Phi(0)=\mathrm{id}Φ(0)=id and Φ′(τ)=DRH(xQ(τ))∘Φ(τ)\Phi'(\tau)=DR_H(x_Q(\tau))\circ\Phi(\tau)Φ′(τ)=DRH​(xQ​(τ))∘Φ(τ) for all τ\tauτ, and every v∈ξxQ(0)v\in\xi_{x_Q(0)}v∈ξxQ​(0)​: Φ(TQ)v=v\Phi(T_Q)v=vΦ(TQ​)v=v implies v=0v=0v=0. (Vacuous if no such Φ\PhiΦ exists.)

Nondegenerate end at infinity on PPP (with sign +1+1+1; written "uuu has end on PPP"). There exist reals d,cd,cd,c and b>0b>0b>0 such that, as s→+∞s\to+\inftys→+∞ and uniformly in t∈Rt\in\mathbb{R}t∈R,

aH(u(e2π(s+it)))−TPs−d→0,ebs(prH(u(e2π(s+it)))−xP(TPt+c))→0.a_H\big(u(e^{2\pi(s+it)})\big)-T_Ps-d\to0,\qquad e^{bs}\big(\mathrm{pr}_H(u(e^{2\pi(s+it)}))-x_P(T_Pt+c)\big)\to0.aH​(u(e2π(s+it)))−TP​s−d→0,ebs(prH​(u(e2π(s+it)))−xP​(TP​t+c))→0.

Fast plane. u:C→V1u:\mathbb{C}\to V_1u:C→V1​ such that:

  1. uuu is a finite energy curve on C\mathbb{C}C;
  2. there exists a prime Reeb orbit P′P'P′ of HHH on which uuu has an end in the above sense;
  3. with w=prH∘uw=\mathrm{pr}_H\circ uw=prH​∘u and πu(z)=cH(w(z), ∂sw(z)−λw(z)(∂sw(z))RH(w(z)))∈C\pi_u(z)=\mathrm{c}_H\big(w(z),\ \partial_sw(z)-\lambda_{w(z)}(\partial_sw(z))R_H(w(z))\big)\in\mathbb{C}πu​(z)=cH​(w(z), ∂s​w(z)−λw(z)​(∂s​w(z))RH​(w(z)))∈C, the zero set ZZZ of πu\pi_uπu​ is finite, and there are integers idx(z)\mathrm{idx}(z)idx(z), z∈Zz\in Zz∈Z, summing to 000, such that for each z∈Zz\in Zz∈Z there is ρ0>0\rho_0>0ρ0​>0 with πu≠0\pi_u\ne0πu​=0 on Bˉ(z,ρ0)∖{z}\bar B(z,\rho_0)\setminus\{z\}Bˉ(z,ρ0​)∖{z} and, for each ρ∈(0,ρ0)\rho\in(0,\rho_0)ρ∈(0,ρ0​), the loop t↦πu(z+ρe2πit)t\mapsto\pi_u(z+\rho e^{2\pi it})t↦πu​(z+ρe2πit) has winding number idx(z)\mathrm{idx}(z)idx(z).

Here a loop f:R→Cf:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{C}f:R→C "has winding number kkk" when fff is continuous, 111-periodic, nowhere zero, and there is a continuous ϑ:R→R\vartheta:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}ϑ:R→R with f=∣f∣eiϑf=|f|e^{i\vartheta}f=∣f∣eiϑ and ϑ(1)−ϑ(0)=2πk\vartheta(1)-\vartheta(0)=2\pi kϑ(1)−ϑ(0)=2πk. An empty ZZZ satisfies clause 3; the definition allows nonempty ZZZ with indices of mixed sign summing to 000.

The coordinate cH(x,v)∈C\mathrm{c}_H(x,v)\in\mathbb{C}cH​(x,v)∈C is

cH(x,v)=ω0(v,f2(x))+i ω0(f1(x),v),fj(x)=∣x∣−1(Qj(x)−DH(x)[Qj(x)]DH(x)[x] x),\mathrm{c}_H(x,v)=\omega_0(v,f_2(x))+i\,\omega_0(f_1(x),v),\qquad f_j(x)=|x|^{-1}\Big(Q_j(x)-\frac{DH(x)[Q_j(x)]}{DH(x)[x]}\,x\Big),cH​(x,v)=ω0​(v,f2​(x))+iω0​(f1​(x),v),fj​(x)=∣x∣−1(Qj​(x)−DH(x)[x]DH(x)[Qj​(x)]​x),

for x,v∈R4x,v\in\mathbb{R}^4x,v∈R4, with ∣x∣|x|∣x∣ the Euclidean norm, Q1(x)=(x3,x2,−x1,−x0)Q_1(x)=(x_3,x_2,-x_1,-x_0)Q1​(x)=(x3​,x2​,−x1​,−x0​) and Q2(x)=(−x2,x3,x0,−x1)Q_2(x)=(-x_2,x_3,x_0,-x_1)Q2​(x)=(−x2​,x3​,x0​,−x1​).

Embedded plane. u:C→Vnu:\mathbb{C}\to V_nu:C→Vn​ is injective and Du(z)Du(z)Du(z) is an injective linear map for every zzz.

Set E(H,J,P,K,γ)\mathcal{E}(H,J,P,K,\gamma)E(H,J,P,K,γ) of embedded fast planes (K⊆V1K\subseteq V_1K⊆V1​, γ∈R\gamma\in\mathbb{R}γ∈R). All u:C→V1u:\mathbb{C}\to V_1u:C→V1​ that are fast planes, have end on PPP, are embedded planes, have u(0)∈Ku(0)\in Ku(0)∈K, and satisfy

Edλ({∣z∣>1},u)=max⁡(γ,0).E_{d\lambda}(\{|z|>1\},u)=\max(\gamma,0).Edλ​({∣z∣>1},u)=max(γ,0).

When γ≤0\gamma\le0γ≤0 this says the energy on {∣z∣>1}\{|z|>1\}{∣z∣>1} is 000. PPP is not itself required to be prime; the prime orbit P′P'P′ of the fast plane condition is a separate existential.

Cloc∞C^\infty_{\mathrm{loc}}Cloc∞​ convergence on C\mathbb{C}C. vk→vv_k\to vvk​→v means: for every compact K⊆CK\subseteq\mathbb{C}K⊆C and every m∈Nm\in\mathbb{N}m∈N, the mmm-th iterated Fréchet derivatives of vkv_kvk​ converge uniformly on KKK to that of vvv.

Sequential Cloc∞C^\infty_{\mathrm{loc}}Cloc∞​ compactness of a set AAA of maps C→V1\mathbb{C}\to V_1C→V1​. Every sequence in AAA has a subsequence (strictly increasing reindexing) converging in Cloc∞C^\infty_{\mathrm{loc}}Cloc∞​ on C\mathbb{C}C to some element of AAA. The empty set has this property.

Hypothesis "CZ index of QQQ is at least mmm" (for a Reeb orbit QQQ of H:V1→RH:V_1\to\mathbb{R}H:V1​→R, m∈Zm\in\mathbb{Z}m∈Z). Identify V1V_1V1​ with R4\mathbb{R}^4R4 and let R\mathcal{R}R be any periodic orbit of HHH for the Hamiltonian field: R=(xR,TR)\mathcal{R}=(x_{\mathcal{R}},T_{\mathcal{R}})R=(xR​,TR​), TR>0T_{\mathcal{R}}>0TR​>0, xR′=XH(xR)x_{\mathcal{R}}'=X_H(x_{\mathcal{R}})xR′​=XH​(xR​), H(xR)=1H(x_{\mathcal{R}})=1H(xR​)=1, xR(t+TR)=xR(t)x_{\mathcal{R}}(t+T_{\mathcal{R}})=x_{\mathcal{R}}(t)xR​(t+TR​)=xR​(t), where XH=(−∂1H,∂0H,−∂3H,∂2H)X_H=(-\partial_1H,\partial_0H,-\partial_3H,\partial_2H)XH​=(−∂1​H,∂0​H,−∂3​H,∂2​H). Then, for every such R\mathcal{R}R with the same image as QQQ and with action TQ=∫0TRλxR(xR′) dτT_Q=\int_0^{T_{\mathcal{R}}}\lambda_{x_{\mathcal{R}}}(x_{\mathcal{R}}')\,d\tauTQ​=∫0TR​​λxR​​(xR′​)dτ, and for every Y:R→L(R4,R4)Y:\mathbb{R}\to\mathcal{L}(\mathbb{R}^4,\mathbb{R}^4)Y:R→L(R4,R4) with Y(0)=idY(0)=\mathrm{id}Y(0)=id, Y′(t)=DXH(xR(t))∘Y(t)Y'(t)=DX_H(x_{\mathcal{R}}(t))\circ Y(t)Y′(t)=DXH​(xR​(t))∘Y(t), one has m≤cz(φ)m\le\mathrm{cz}(\varphi)m≤cz(φ). Here φ:R→M2(R)\varphi:\mathbb{R}\to M_2(\mathbb{R})φ:R→M2​(R) has entries

φ(τ)ij=(cHR2)i(xR(TRτ), prξ(Y(TRτ)f(j)(xR(0)))),\varphi(\tau)_{ij}=\Big(\mathrm{c}^{\mathbb{R}^2}_H\Big)_i\Big(x_{\mathcal{R}}(T_{\mathcal{R}}\tau),\ \mathrm{pr}^{\xi}\big(Y(T_{\mathcal{R}}\tau)f^{(j)}(x_{\mathcal{R}}(0))\big)\Big),φ(τ)ij​=(cHR2​)i​(xR​(TR​τ), prξ(Y(TR​τ)f(j)(xR​(0)))),

with cHR2\mathrm{c}_H^{\mathbb{R}^2}cHR2​ the real pair (Re cH,Im cH)(\mathrm{Re}\,\mathrm{c}_H,\mathrm{Im}\,\mathrm{c}_H)(RecH​,ImcH​), f(1)=f1f^{(1)}=f_1f(1)=f1​, f(2)=f2f^{(2)}=f_2f(2)=f2​, and prξ(v)=v−λx(v)λx(XH(x))XH(x)\mathrm{pr}^\xi(v)=v-\frac{\lambda_x(v)}{\lambda_x(X_H(x))}X_H(x)prξ(v)=v−λx​(XH​(x))λx​(v)​XH​(x) at x=xR(TRτ)x=x_{\mathcal{R}}(T_{\mathcal{R}}\tau)x=xR​(TR​τ). The integer cz(φ)\mathrm{cz}(\varphi)cz(φ) is: let WWW be the set of numbers (θ(1)−s)/(2π)(\theta(1)-s)/(2\pi)(θ(1)−s)/(2π) over s∈[0,2π]s\in[0,2\pi]s∈[0,2π] and θ\thetaθ continuous on [0,1][0,1][0,1] with θ(0)=s\theta(0)=sθ(0)=s and φ(t)(cos⁡s,sin⁡s)T=r(cos⁡θ(t),sin⁡θ(t))T\varphi(t)(\cos s,\sin s)^{\mathsf T}=r(\cos\theta(t),\sin\theta(t))^{\mathsf T}φ(t)(coss,sins)T=r(cosθ(t),sinθ(t))T for some r>0r>0r>0 for each t∈[0,1]t\in[0,1]t∈[0,1]; let a=inf⁡Wa=\inf Wa=infW, b=sup⁡Wb=\sup Wb=supW (with the convention that both equal 000 if WWW is empty, and each equals 000 if unbounded on its side). Then cz(φ)=2(⌈b⌉−1)\mathrm{cz}(\varphi)=2(\lceil b\rceil-1)cz(φ)=2(⌈b⌉−1) if a≤⌈b⌉−1a\le\lceil b\rceil-1a≤⌈b⌉−1, and cz(φ)=2⌈b⌉−1\mathrm{cz}(\varphi)=2\lceil b\rceil-1cz(φ)=2⌈b⌉−1 otherwise. The hypothesis is universally quantified over R\mathcal{R}R and YYY and so is vacuous if no such pair exists.

Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Nov 4, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by Mazecto · Nov 4, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paperProve2Me Team
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me