A parabolic cohomology dimension bound from the two period relations
ProvedMTT.Cohomology.parabolicH1_add_one_le_periodRelationsgroup-cohomologymodular-formsperiods
Let be even, let with the MTT left action , and put for the standard matrices of . For
one has
The additional one accounts for the nonzero principal-cocycle direction among translation-normalized cocycles. This is the algebraic reduction needed to compare level-one parabolic cohomology with the explicit period-polynomial dimension; it assumes no analytic Eichler–Shimura theorem.
Preamble
import Definitions.Def_MTT_LevelOnePeriodRelations import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.FiniteDimensional.Defs set_option autoImplicit false noncomputable section
Formal statement
theorem MTT.Cohomology.parabolicH1_add_one_le_periodRelations {n : ℕ}
(hn : Even n) (hnpos : 0 < n) :
Module.finrank ℂ (MTT.Cohomology.ParabolicH1 1 n) + 1 ≤
Module.finrank ℂ (MTT.Cohomology.periodRelations n) := by sorrySource
Don Zagier, Periods of modular forms, traces of Hecke operators, and multiple zeta values, RIMS Kokyuroku 843 (1993), pp. 162–164, https://people.mpim-bonn.mpg.de/zagier/files/kokyuroku/843/fulltext.pdf. The source identifies translation-normalized cocycles with period relations and the residual principal direction. This node proves only the necessary dimension inequality, directly from normalization, S,T generation, the torsion relations S^2=(ST)^3=-I, and a nonzero principal cocycle. The MTT left action is retained throughout; the analytic period isomorphism is not used.