Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

One step of Schwarz's lemma for Cartesian products: an entire function replaced by its Hermite interpolant in one variable, with bounds

Proved
Transcendence.coord_hermite_step

by carlok · Oct 2, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

diaz-modulus-leannumber-theorytranscendence

Let ggg be an entire function on Cι\mathbb{C}^\iotaCι (ι\iotaι finite) with ∣g∣≤K|g| \le K∣g∣≤K on the closed polydisc of radius RRR, let i∈ιi \in \iotai∈ι and S0∈NS_0 \in \mathbb{N}S0​∈N, and let EEE be a finite set of complex numbers ζ\zetaζ with ∣ζ∣≤r|\zeta| \le r∣ζ∣≤r, where 0<r0 < r0<r and 5r≤R5r \le R5r≤R; put p=∣E∣S0p = |E|S_0p=∣E∣S0​. There is an entire function hhh on Cι\mathbb{C}^\iotaCι such that:

  • ∣h∣≤3pK|h| \le 3^{p}K∣h∣≤3pK on the closed polydisc of radius RRR;
  • ∣g−h∣≤(2r)p(3/R)pK|g - h| \le (2r)^{p}(3/R)^{p}K∣g−h∣≤(2r)p(3/R)pK on the closed polydisc of radius rrr;
  • for every point ξ\xiξ and all coordinate directions v0,…,vm−1v_0, \dots, v_{m-1}v0​,…,vm−1​ different from iii: if, for every ζ∈E\zeta \in Eζ∈E and every k<S0k < S_0k<S0​, the derivative of ggg of order m+km + km+k along ev0,…,evm−1e_{v_0}, \dots, e_{v_{m-1}}ev0​​,…,evm−1​​ followed by kkk times eie_iei​ vanishes at ξ[i:=ζ]\xi[i := \zeta]ξ[i:=ζ], then the derivative of hhh of order mmm along ev0,…,evm−1e_{v_0}, \dots, e_{v_{m-1}}ev0​​,…,evm−1​​ vanishes at ξ\xiξ.

Here ξ[i:=ζ]\xi[i := \zeta]ξ[i:=ζ] is ξ\xiξ with its coordinate ξi\xi_iξi​ replaced by ζ\zetaζ, the polydiscs are centred at 000, and the derivatives are values of iteratedFDeriv on the coordinate vectors eνe_\nueν​.

In the proof, hhh is the Hermite interpolant of ggg in the variable ziz_izi​ at the nodes of EEE, each with multiplicity S0S_0S0​. Applied in each coordinate in turn, it proves Transcendence.cartesian_schwarz.

It is one step of the proof of Baker's theorem formalised in this mission, which follows Chapter 4 of Waldschmidt's book: Baker's theorem from the criterion of Schneider–Lang for Cartesian products, as observed by Bertrand and Masser (1980).

Novelty. None: a step of the proof of Proposition 4.7 of Waldschmidt's book (pp. 122–130). It does the work of Lemma 4.8 in the book's case m=nm = nm=n, with the bounds of Step 2.4, one coordinate at a time. The book's route goes through the ideal of Lemma 4.8 in all the variables at once, and its Step 2.1 uses Osgood's lemma and asserts the continuity of f/P(zn)f/P(z_n)f/P(zn​) without proof; here only the remainder has to be entire in all the variables, and the quotient is only bounded, slice by slice, so only one-variable complex analysis is used. The contribution of this node is the formal proof.

Preamble
import Mathlib
Formal statement
namespace Transcendence

/-- **One step of Schwarz's lemma for Cartesian products** (Waldschmidt, *Diophantine Approximation on Linear
Algebraic Groups*, proof of Prop. 4.7: Lemma 4.8 in one variable, with explicit bounds). Let `g` be an entire
function of the variables `z_ν` (`ν ∈ ι`) with `|g| ≤ K` on the closed polydisc of radius `R`, let `i ∈ ι`, and
let `E` be a finite set of points in the closed disc of radius `r > 0`, where `R ≥ 5r`; put `p = |E|·S₀`. There
is an entire function `h` (the Hermite interpolant of `g` in the variable `z_i` at the nodes `E`, each of
multiplicity `S₀`) with `|h| ≤ 3^p·K` on the polydisc of radius `R` and `|g - h| ≤ (2r)^p·(3/R)^p·K` on the
polydisc of radius `r`, and through which derivatives in the other variables pass: the derivative of `h` at `ξ`
along the coordinate directions `v 0, …, v (m-1)`, all different from `i`, vanishes as soon as, for every
`ζ ∈ E` and `k < S₀`, the derivative of `g` along `v 0, …, v (m-1)` followed by `k` times `i` vanishes at the
point `ξ` with its coordinate `ξ_i` replaced by `ζ`. -/
theorem coord_hermite_step {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] [DecidableEq ι]
    {g : (ι → ℂ) → ℂ} (hg : AnalyticOnNhd ℂ g Set.univ) (i : ι) (E : Finset ℂ) (S₀ : ℕ)
    {r R K : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) (hR : 5 * r ≤ R) (hE : ∀ ζ ∈ E, ‖ζ‖ ≤ r)
    (hK : ∀ y ∈ Metric.closedBall (0 : ι → ℂ) R, ‖g y‖ ≤ K) :
    ∃ h : (ι → ℂ) → ℂ, AnalyticOnNhd ℂ h Set.univ ∧
      (∀ z ∈ Metric.closedBall (0 : ι → ℂ) R, ‖h z‖ ≤ 3 ^ (E.card * S₀) * K) ∧
      (∀ z ∈ Metric.closedBall (0 : ι → ℂ) r,
        ‖g z - h z‖ ≤ (2 * r) ^ (E.card * S₀) * ((3 / R) ^ (E.card * S₀) * K)) ∧
      ∀ (m : ℕ) (v : Fin m → ι), (∀ t, v t ≠ i) → ∀ ξ : ι → ℂ,
        (∀ ζ ∈ E, ∀ k < S₀, iteratedFDeriv ℂ (m + k) g (Function.update ξ i ζ)
          (fun t => Pi.single (Fin.append v (fun _ : Fin k => i) t) 1) = 0) →
        iteratedFDeriv ℂ m h ξ (fun t => Pi.single (v t) 1) = 0 := by
  sorry

end Transcendence
Source
A step of the proof of M. Waldschmidt, Diophantine Approximation on Linear Algebraic Groups, Grundlehren 326, Springer, 2000, Proposition 4.7 (pp. 122–130): the case m = n of Lemma 4.8 (pp. 123–126) in one coordinate, with the bounds of Step 2.4. Formal proof: Diaz modulus mission, 2 October 2026 (C. Perassi).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me