Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Schneider's eighth problem: at least one of e^e and e^{e²} is transcendental

Proved
Transcendence.exp_e_or_exp_e_sq_transcendental

by carlok · Sep 30, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

diaz-modulus-leannumber-theorytranscendence

At least one of the two numbers

eeandee2e^{e} \qquad\text{and}\qquad e^{e^{2}}eeandee2

is transcendental.

This is the last of the eight open problems in Schneider's book (1957), as quoted by Waldschmidt (1973), p. 191.

Proof. Apply DiazModulus.two_algebraically_independent_of_exp_column at x=y=(1,e)x = y = (1, e)x=y=(1,e). Both pairs are linearly independent over Q\mathbb{Q}Q because eee is irrational. The column y2=ey_2 = ey2​=e carries exactly eee^{e}ee and ee2e^{e^{2}}ee2. If both were algebraic, all eight numbers would be algebraic over Q(e)\mathbb{Q}(e)Q(e), a field of transcendence degree one, against the theorem.

Novelty. None: this is the case r=1r = 1r=1 of the Solution du problème de Schneider in Waldschmidt (1973), p. 192, which the paper deduces from its Corollaire 1 (for rational rrr, one of eere^{e^r}eer, ee2re^{e^{2r}}ee2r is transcendental). The substitution used here is Corollaire 1's, with x1x_1x1​ and x2x_2x2​ exchanged. By the note added in proof (p. 202), Brownawell solved the problem independently. The contribution of this node is the formal proof.

Preamble
import Mathlib
Formal statement
namespace Transcendence

/-- One of `e^e` and `e^{e²}` is transcendental.

This is the problem in the title of M. Waldschmidt, *Solution du huitième problème de Schneider*,
J. Number Theory 5 (1973), 191–202. It is the Théorème there
(`DiazModulus.two_algebraically_independent_of_exp_column`) at `x = y = (1, e)`: the column is
`e^e`, `e^{e²}`, and if both were algebraic, the eight numbers `1, e, 1, e, e, e^e, e^e, e^{e²}`
would all be algebraic over `ℚ(e)`, so no two of them could be algebraically independent. -/
theorem exp_e_or_exp_e_sq_transcendental :
    Transcendental ℚ (Complex.exp (Complex.exp 1)) ∨
      Transcendental ℚ (Complex.exp (Complex.exp 1 ^ 2)) := by
  sorry

end Transcendence
Source
The problem: T. Schneider, Einführung in die transzendenten Zahlen, Springer, Berlin, 1957, as quoted in M. Waldschmidt, Solution du huitième problème de Schneider, J. Number Theory 5 (1973), 191–202, p. 191. The solution: the same paper, p. 192 (Solution du problème de Schneider, r = 1, deduced from Corollaire 1); found independently by W. D. Brownawell, The algebraic independence of certain numbers related by the exponential function, J. Number Theory 6 (1974), 22–31. Formal proof: Diaz modulus mission, 30 September 2026 (C. Perassi).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me