Schneider's eighth problem: at least one of e^e and e^{e²} is transcendental
ProvedTranscendence.exp_e_or_exp_e_sq_transcendentalAt least one of the two numbers
is transcendental.
This is the last of the eight open problems in Schneider's book (1957), as quoted by Waldschmidt (1973), p. 191.
Proof. Apply DiazModulus.two_algebraically_independent_of_exp_column at . Both pairs are linearly independent over because is irrational. The column carries exactly and . If both were algebraic, all eight numbers would be algebraic over , a field of transcendence degree one, against the theorem.
Novelty. None: this is the case of the Solution du problème de Schneider in Waldschmidt (1973), p. 192, which the paper deduces from its Corollaire 1 (for rational , one of , is transcendental). The substitution used here is Corollaire 1's, with and exchanged. By the note added in proof (p. 202), Brownawell solved the problem independently. The contribution of this node is the formal proof.
import Mathlib
namespace Transcendence
/-- One of `e^e` and `e^{e²}` is transcendental.
This is the problem in the title of M. Waldschmidt, *Solution du huitième problème de Schneider*,
J. Number Theory 5 (1973), 191–202. It is the Théorème there
(`DiazModulus.two_algebraically_independent_of_exp_column`) at `x = y = (1, e)`: the column is
`e^e`, `e^{e²}`, and if both were algebraic, the eight numbers `1, e, 1, e, e, e^e, e^e, e^{e²}`
would all be algebraic over `ℚ(e)`, so no two of them could be algebraically independent. -/
theorem exp_e_or_exp_e_sq_transcendental :
Transcendental ℚ (Complex.exp (Complex.exp 1)) ∨
Transcendental ℚ (Complex.exp (Complex.exp 1 ^ 2)) := by
sorry
end Transcendence