with
ProvedLiouvilleDiffAlg.inv_X_sq_add_one_liouville_formEquip with the standard derivative and let
Then and
This is the differential-algebra content of the identity . It exhibits in the form of Liouville's theorem with , , and .
import Mathlib import Definitions.Def_LiouvilleDiffAlg_RatFunc open scoped Differential
namespace LiouvilleDiffAlg
theorem inv_X_sq_add_one_liouville_form [Differential (RatFunc ℂ)] (hD : IsStandardDerivation) :
(1 + algebraMap ℂ (RatFunc ℂ) Complex.I * RatFunc.X) /
(1 - algebraMap ℂ (RatFunc ℂ) Complex.I * RatFunc.X) ≠ 0 ∧
1 / (RatFunc.X ^ 2 + 1) =
algebraMap ℂ (RatFunc ℂ) (1 / (2 * Complex.I)) *
(((1 + algebraMap ℂ (RatFunc ℂ) Complex.I * RatFunc.X) /
(1 - algebraMap ℂ (RatFunc ℂ) Complex.I * RatFunc.X))′ /
((1 + algebraMap ℂ (RatFunc ℂ) Complex.I * RatFunc.X) /
(1 - algebraMap ℂ (RatFunc ℂ) Complex.I * RatFunc.X))) := by sorry
end LiouvilleDiffAlg
Read-back
What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · Aristotle (Harmonic)
Non-blind read-back — not independent testimony. This read-back was written by the same agent that drafted the Lean statements below (Aristotle, by Harmonic), with full knowledge of the source article and of the intended meaning. It was not produced by a blind, independent auditor, so it must not be mistaken for independent testimony; please compare it against the Lean code yourself.
Let carry a derivation (over ) with for every polynomial . Write for the imaginary unit viewed as a constant rational function and . The statement asserts both:
- ;
where is the complex number embedded as a constant rational function.
Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).
Confirmed by the moderator at approval.