Finite maximal supergraph for a predicate
ProvedWilliamsonShmoys.finite_graph_exists_maximal_predicate_supergraph__p2m_4dc84fc8_9837_496e_bb19_eb0d0139a4ff_a2approximation-algorithmsplanar-graphstreewidth
For any predicate on simple graphs over a finite linearly ordered vertex type, if it holds of L, there is a predicate-satisfying supergraph of L with no proper predicate-satisfying edge extension.
Preamble
import Mathlib set_option autoImplicit false
Formal statement
theorem WilliamsonShmoys.finite_graph_exists_maximal_predicate_supergraph__p2m_4dc84fc8_9837_496e_bb19_eb0d0139a4ff_a2
{V : Type} [Fintype V] [LinearOrder V]
(L : SimpleGraph V) (P : SimpleGraph V → Prop) (hP : P L) :
letI : forall G : SimpleGraph V, DecidableRel G.Adj := fun G => Classical.decRel G.Adj
exists M : SimpleGraph V,
L.edgeFinset ⊆ M.edgeFinset /\
P M /\
forall N : SimpleGraph V,
(forall u v, M.Adj u v -> N.Adj u v) ->
P N ->
forall u v, N.Adj u v -> M.Adj u v := by
sorrySource
David P. Williamson and David B. Shmoys, The Design of Approximation Algorithms, Cambridge University Press, 2011, author electronic manuscript, Section 10.2, proof of Theorem 10.11, pp. 270-272. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511921735. Bounded tree-width of the pieces: Robertson–Seymour (planar graphs of radius r have tree-width at most 3r+1) / Bodlaender (k-outerplanar graphs have tree-width at most 3k-1).