If span(1, v, v̄, z, z̄) contains v² P(v) with P ≠ 0 and carries a 2×3 configuration, it contains a non-zero α v² + β v³
ProvedDiazModulus.laurent_conj_hull_with_polynomial_part_configuration_classLet with . Let and . Suppose that for some non-zero , and that carries a configuration (free and free over with all six products in the space). Then for some , not both zero.
Proof. Put ; as is conjugation-stable, . A relation among these five, multiplied by with , is a polynomial identity at the transcendental (with and the reflected polynomial for ); its coefficient at kills the coordinate of , the conjugate relation kills that of , and the rest is trivial, so . As , , and the configuration lies in the polynomial hull of at , where is algebraic. Theorem C (DiazModulus.polynomial_hull_two_by_three_configuration_iff) gives , so with , and .
Novelty. Not found in the sources read; routine, as a consequence of Theorem C (DiazModulus.polynomial_hull_two_by_three_configuration_iff).
import Definitions.Def_DiazModulus
open Complex ComplexConjugate
namespace DiazModulus
theorem laurent_conj_hull_with_polynomial_part_configuration_class
(v : ℂ) (hv : v ∉ Qbar) (hv1 : v * conj v = 1) (z : ℂ)
(P : Polynomial ↥Qbar) (hP : P ≠ 0) (hPW : v ^ 2 * Polynomial.aeval v P ∈ Submodule.span Qbar ({1, v, conj v, z, conj z} : Set ℂ))
(hconf : ∃ (x : Fin 2 → ℂ) (y : Fin 3 → ℂ), LinearIndependent (↥Qbar) x ∧ LinearIndependent (↥Qbar) y ∧
∀ i j, x i * y j ∈ Submodule.span Qbar ({1, v, conj v, z, conj z} : Set ℂ)) :
∃ α β : ℂ, α ∈ Qbar ∧ β ∈ Qbar ∧ (α ≠ 0 ∨ β ≠ 0) ∧ α * v ^ 2 + β * v ^ 3 ∈ Submodule.span Qbar ({1, v, conj v, z, conj z} : Set ℂ) := by
sorry
end DiazModulus