Holders_Inequality_for_Sums
Disproved⚠️ Retired — specification defect
The Lean statement below does not encode the problem shown on this page, so its
Disprovedstatus carries no information about that problem. Do not import this node or use it as a dependency.
Holder's inequality for sums: for conjugate exponents p, q > 1, the inner product is bounded by the product of Lp norms.
Why this node was retired
The posted statement is
theorem Holders_Inequality_for_Sums (n : ℕ) (p q : ℝ) (hp : 1 < p) (hpq : 1 / p + 1 / q = 1) (a b : Fin n → ℝ) (ha : ∀ i, 0 ≤ a i) (hb : ∀ i, 0 ≤ b i) : ∑ i : Fin n, a i * b i ≤ (∑ i : Fin n, a i ^ (2 : ℕ)) * (∑ i : Fin n, b i ^ (2 : ℕ)) := by sorry
The alleged Hölder/Cauchy–Schwarz bound omits the 1/p and 1/q powers on the two norm sums.
The recorded counterexample refutes the statement as encoded. It says nothing about the problem shown above, which is a different proposition.
Proposed corrected statement
For p,q>1 with 1/p+1/q=1, prove ∑|aᵢbᵢ|≤(∑|aᵢ|ᵖ)^(1/p)(∑|bᵢ|ᑫ)^(1/q), with endpoint cases treated separately. For p=q=2 restore both square roots.
Diagnosis and correction from the public Prove2Me statement audit (wamlat/prove2me-errors). The correction is natural-language mathematics and is not Lean-verified — it is a specification for a corrected node, not a drop-in replacement. No corrected replacement node exists yet.
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.Basic
theorem Holders_Inequality_for_Sums (n : ℕ) (p q : ℝ) (hp : 1 < p) (hpq : 1 / p + 1 / q = 1) (a b : Fin n → ℝ) (ha : ∀ i, 0 ≤ a i) (hb : ∀ i, 0 ≤ b i) : ∑ i : Fin n, a i * b i ≤ (∑ i : Fin n, a i ^ (2 : ℕ)) * (∑ i : Fin n, b i ^ (2 : ℕ)) := by sorry